As long as they don't try to make money off of it and their children get a normal education, they can think whatever they want.

fightinfrenchman wrote:@Goodspeed How would you like this to be done?

Ban churches and any other for-profit religious oranizations, and most importantly ban religious education. Children should get a picture of reality that is consistent with science, no matter which family they're born into.

fightinfrenchman wrote:

Goodspeed wrote:

fightinfrenchman wrote:It's commonly regarded as the greatest song of all time

Which almost certainly means it's overrated

Post your most controversial opinion

Ban religion

RefluxSemantic wrote:I think Bohemian Rapsody is just straight up a bad song. It's not even fun to listen to. I'd rather have pure silence.

Now that's controversial

fightinfrenchman wrote:It's commonly regarded as the greatest song of all time

Which almost certainly means it's overrated

How is that controversial

That was a joke referencing the common complaint from non-Sanders supporters about the "Bernie or bust" thing in 2016 and the assumption that something similar would happen in 2020, which the data seemed to be proving wrong. The data proving that wrong was his real point.

They probably know what's up so I'm gonna go with my boy Pete.

I'm confused by that post. Maybe it's because you're memeing 1. According to this poll they overwhelmingly would support the other 3 candidates over Trump (of course, actually coming out to vote is another matter, which this poll didn't account for). 2. Your very much unsaved argument as I understoo...

I found it hard to believe that 10% of Warren supporters would back Trump over any one of the other 3 and went into the polling data, and here's why you don't go to Twitter for conclusions based on polling data: Out of the 65 people who said they support Warren, 7 said they would vote Trump over Bi...

fightinfrenchman wrote:Yes. It's not going to make the world "uninhabitable," and exaggerating the effects of it aren't helpful in dealing with the reality of it

It actually is kind of helpful. People tend not to care unless you tell them they or their children are fucked.

I found it hard to believe that 10% of Warren supporters would back Trump over any one of the other 3 and went into the polling data, and here's why you don't go to Twitter for conclusions based on polling data: Out of the 65 people who said they support Warren, 7 said they would vote Trump over Bid...

Should be

Some of you are in need of a reminder of the rules. Specifically . . . 2. At the bottom of your player sheet is your balance (points available to bet with). If this number reaches less than zero as a result of you placing bets, none of your bets will be counted so make sure it stays above or equal ...

It's not only racism

Mr_Bramboy wrote:

princeofcarthage wrote:Game 2 was won by me.

:doubt:

Yeah we conceded to prince, or at least I did. It wasn't decided as much as our time ran out that night and the game didn't seem worth continuing, but he was definitely in a winning position after everyone weakened each other with early wars.

I'm not the ear?
edit: I also don't see him making any points about the campaign.

[mention]u93[/mention] It’s a Reddit community which is at most loosely affiliated with the campaign, it’s not like he’s refusing CNN reporters in his media pool. I know it's a reddit community, I used to be subscribed to it. That doesn't make it okay. This attitude of "You don't agree with me...

https://edition.cnn.com/

Where is the slander?

if you think the mainstream media treats all candidates equally you are an idiot.

They don't but blacklisting a medium because it tends not to confirm your existing beliefs isn't productive. It's even dangerous, if you keep doing it. See: Fox news

Title

Challenger_Marco wrote:It srsly a troll but very confusing wtf

I genuinely don't understand why anyone would believe that post. It's so obviously not serious. Look at the screenshot lol

More self-deprecating, rather. I don't think it's something he would say and you do. Neither is silly or dishonest. We simply differ in our judgments of his character.

fightinfrenchman wrote:It's also what you think, you just phrased it differently

You just called your own defense silly

Figures