Chinese Discussion Thread

User avatar
Netherlands edeholland
ESOC Community Team
Donator 01
Posts: 5033
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: edeholland
GameRanger ID: 4053888
Clan: ESOC

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by edeholland »

Pro player vs normal player (rofl)
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by momuuu »

Diarouga is normal player confirmed.
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

chun wrote:
edeholland wrote:Pro player vs normal player (rofl)
i say not with utube ok .
not utube riot vs Diarouga ???
i dont say Diarouga(i dont say normal player lol)

i say other pro player vs other normal player(use other civ) .
china cant win by rush hard (cav+musk) or cavalry

i not say with youtube. ok understand
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

jerom wrote:Diarouga is normal player confirmed.
i don''t say Diarouga(i don''t say he''s normal player )
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

paul wrote:
chun wrote:http://ageofempires.wikia.com/wiki/Zamburak

he rof 1.5
wrong it is. sure i am.
52.5 damage vs Calvary with rof 1.5

keshik have 8*3 = 24 damage vs cavalry with rof 1.5

? balance patch? um wait or bye this game.
User avatar
China fei123456
Jaeger
Posts: 3285
Joined: Apr 23, 2015
ESO: fei123456
Location: Alderaan

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by fei123456 »

chun wrote:
paul wrote:wrong it is. sure i am.
52.5 damage vs Calvary with rof 1.5

keshik have 8*3 = 24 damage vs cavalry with rof 1.5

? balance patch? um wait or bye this game.

zamburak rof 3. test yourself.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

jerom wrote:Diarouga is normal player confirmed.

It seems I am :P
And btw, as garja said at the end, he failed, otherwise the musk/huss shouldn''t really work vs a good chinese who ages up with the academy.
The MU is still quite fair tho, on non herdable maps.
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

diarouga wrote:
jerom wrote:Diarouga is normal player confirmed.
It seems I am :P
And btw, as garja said at the end, he failed, otherwise the musk/huss shouldnt really work vs a good chinese who ages up with the academy.
The MU is still quite fair tho, on non herdable maps.
i dont say, u are normal player.
and he dreaming?

have more game china vs other civ. cant win.
I think u see its.
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

paul wrote:
chun wrote:52.5 damage vs Calvary with rof 1.5

keshik have 8*3 = 24 damage vs cavalry with rof 1.5

? balance patch? um wait or bye this game.
zamburak rof 3. test yourself.
I dont know. I dont play India.
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
Gendarme
Posts: 9314
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by zoom »

If you do not know then do not claim to know in the first place, please.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

China is definitely not a bad civ.
I don't want them to be nerfed but they're far from being UP.
No Flag pikadasgalaxias
Musketeer
Posts: 52
Joined: Jun 29, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by pikadasgalaxias »

China was the third is a great civ. But in the age 2 it is very weak against Rush civ such as Russia and Ottoman. Almost impossible to win. I think it would be good to have a better defense early. As the village attack when garrisoned (maximum 5 (45 attack) attack settlers, and the letter of the village is 10 (90 attacks)), and not to get op more in the age 3 to change something, I can not say what now.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

That would be super op.
No Flag pikadasgalaxias
Musketeer
Posts: 52
Joined: Jun 29, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by pikadasgalaxias »

Improve the era 2 China is bad. And to make matters worse it would be necessary to balance the era 3
User avatar
No Flag Good ol Ivan
Howdah
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mar 31, 2015
ESO: ivanelterrible

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by Good ol Ivan »

chun wrote:
paul wrote:wrong it is. sure i am.
52.5 damage vs Calvary with rof 1.5

keshik have 8*3 = 24 damage vs cavalry with rof 1.5

? balance patch? um wait or bye this game.
Lol zams have 3.0 rof
Only gunpowder light cav with 1.5 rof are RRs.
But yeah keshiks are shit.

Imho:
-Increase keshik HP by 10
-Nerf intervention to 8 musks
-Decrease steppe rider cost 5 coin.
-Nerf old han
User avatar
Great Britain britishmusketeer
Howdah
Posts: 1845
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by britishmusketeer »

You don't want to make china an age 2 civ since it would just standardise them.
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by momuuu »

You might want to tweak old han reforms a bit. Although thats the most fun card in the game.
User avatar
Italy Garja
Retired Contributor
Donator 02
Posts: 9729
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
ESO: Garja

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by Garja »

China issues are pretty clear. Need a buff to colo cav, nerf to fortress shipemtns and a tweak on old han reforms. It's just a matter of wanting to change those things or not.
Image Image Image
No Flag anonymousv2
Musketeer
Posts: 53
Joined: Jul 11, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by anonymousv2 »

China is kinda broken because they rely on extremely strong shipments and they have few colonial options.
Palestine Mimsy for President
Jaeger
Posts: 3680
Joined: Feb 21, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by Mimsy for President »

I'm fine with Old Han, it's their game-changing thing and they only get it in Industrial like French with gendarms (I know it's easier for China to go Indus but still).
How about increasing training time ? I don't think it will penalize the civ that much since most of its units are provided by the Home City.
User avatar
No Flag Good ol Ivan
Howdah
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mar 31, 2015
ESO: ivanelterrible

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by Good ol Ivan »

britishmusketeer wrote:You don''t want to make china an age 2 civ since it would just standardise them.
Currently the only way to play china is to ff because their fort is so good and their colo fucking sucks.
I would like to see china viable in both, without being too OP. Kinda like France.
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

ivan wrote:
chun wrote:52.5 damage vs Calvary with rof 1.5

keshik have 8*3 = 24 damage vs cavalry with rof 1.5

? balance patch? um wait or bye this game.
Lol zams have 3.0 rof
Only gunpowder light cav with 1.5 rof are RRs.
But yeah keshiks are shit.

Imho:
-Increase keshik HP by 10
-Nerf intervention to 8 musks
-Decrease steppe rider cost 5 coin.
-Nerf old han

I think . China will lose at age1 or age2 because china start age 2 avg. at5.00min. china will lose rush hard. lose cavalry+musk or full cavalry. if china can age3. china will lose at age3??
because china will lose 2 house. lose village. lose pop. lose eco. lose tc. cant age 4. I watch Boneng. he china fl. lose rush hard. I think china will lose. at age2 or age3,

sum up, china will lose at age2 age3 , cant will age4 . cant use old han reform card.
No Flag สยาม
Skirmisher
Posts: 102
Joined: May 7, 2015

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by สยาม »

garja wrote:China issues are pretty clear. Need a buff to colo cav, nerf to fortress shipemtns and a tweak on old han reforms. It''s just a matter of wanting to change those things or not.
I think . If u can age3. shipment useless for china age3? because u lose house. lose village. village can''t fram(hunt animal or mine. wood?) lose eco.

It = gg = lose? I know u better than me.

u start age2 at 4.40min and will go age3 at6.00min, u lose rush hard by cavalry+musk or full cavalry. u can age3 but lose village. lose eco. lose shipment at age3? 9 china musk or 4calvary can''t fight .
if japanese can 2 shipment at one card?

If japanese op. can fram at tc.

sum up, china will lose at age2 age3 , can''t will age4 . can''t use old han reform card.
User avatar
China fei123456
Jaeger
Posts: 3285
Joined: Apr 23, 2015
ESO: fei123456
Location: Alderaan

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by fei123456 »

dont nerf old han. if so, nerf otto and spain revolt first.
china age 2 cav is too weak. and age 3 cav needs some nerf(training speed?).
forbidden army(age 3 cav) is interesting. iron flail is shit. meteur hammer is quite low-hp too. but when they work together they are just insane. so, maybe we can change forbidden army from 2 flail 2 hammer into 3 changdao 2 hammer?
User avatar
China fei123456
Jaeger
Posts: 3285
Joined: Apr 23, 2015
ESO: fei123456
Location: Alderaan

Chinese Discussion Thread

Post by fei123456 »

standard army
from 2 steppe rider 3 ckn to 3 rider 2 ckn

forbidden army
from 2 flail 2 hammer to 3 changdao 2 hammer

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV