why people play treaty?

Germany supernapoleon
Lancer
Posts: 655
Joined: Sep 9, 2015
ESO: Supernapoleon
Location: Munich

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by supernapoleon »

If there will not be treaty implemented in AoE3 DE I do not see any reason why I should buy it.
"I'M SOOOOOO GOOD AT THE GAME"
Hazza wrote: "I mad u win cos u get carried all game and have to lame every game"
Image
User avatar
United States of America dicktator_
Howdah
EWT
Posts: 1565
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
ESO: Conquerer999

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by dicktator_ »

deleted_user wrote:I like how this all (seemingly) started as a joke from @lordraphael to remove the TR game mode from AoE IV/AoE3DE for no reason other than to "trigger" (holy fuq I actually used that word) TR players. And look where we are now...

Except he wasn't joking lol.
steniothejonjoe wrote:I can micro better than 99% of the player base and that's 100% objective
:mds:
User avatar
United States of America Hidddy_
Retired Contributor
Posts: 379
Joined: Jan 9, 2017
ESO: Hidalgito
Location: Miami, Florida, USA

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Hidddy_ »

Imo killing treaty would be terrible for the community. I think one actual concern people should have with aoe3DE is the civ balance. If treaty and supremacy are both in the DE, it would be nice if they tweaked the civ balance differently in the two game modes. It'd be like having TP and EP in the same game
De Funk
No Flag deleted_user
Ninja
Posts: 14364
Joined: Mar 26, 2015

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by deleted_user »

Hidddy_ wrote:Imo killing treaty would be terrible for the community. I think one actual concern people should have with aoe3DE is the civ balance. If treaty and supremacy are both in the DE, it would be nice if they tweaked the civ balance differently in the two game modes. It'd be like having TP and EP in the same game

very nice made up post! I like the idea of having improved treaty with AOE3DE
User avatar
Netherlands dietschlander
Lancer
Posts: 944
Joined: Oct 8, 2015
Location: Dietschland

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by dietschlander »

Idea: having pre-made bases.
saves 40 minutes, go walk a dog
Theres going to be a dam, the great dam and we'll let the beavers pay for it - Edeholland 2016
Anyway, nuancing isn't your forte, so I'll agree with you like I would with a 8 year old: violence is bad, don't do hard drugs and stay in school Benj98
User avatar
Bavaria Gichtenlord
Howdah
Donator 03
Posts: 1437
Joined: Nov 15, 2015

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Gichtenlord »

dietschlander wrote:Idea: having pre-made bases.
saves 40 minutes, go walk a dog

Good idea. Thanks!
r]
Great Britain InsectPoison
Lancer
Posts: 970
Joined: Mar 6, 2016

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by InsectPoison »

dietschlander wrote:Idea: having pre-made bases.
saves 40 minutes, go walk a dog

Most players enjoy the boom period. Also having premade base and resources will remove skill as certain civs are quite hard to boom with.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
United States of America Hidddy_
Retired Contributor
Posts: 379
Joined: Jan 9, 2017
ESO: Hidalgito
Location: Miami, Florida, USA

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Hidddy_ »

Must agree there with IP, the boom period is very important as is the post-40 macro (especially for cowing civs). Removing the 40 minute boom period would ruin the game mode for treaty players. However, it would be great to implement something like Gichten's 40 in 10 scenario as an option for players who want to get straight to the fighting and don't mind having preset resources.

Edit: giving credit where credit is do
De Funk
User avatar
New Zealand ocemilky
Dragoon
Posts: 205
Joined: Aug 5, 2015
ESO: Motch | Milky__

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by ocemilky »

Hidddy_ wrote: dicktator's 40 in 10 scenario


rip @Gichtenlord
sergyou wrote:i won't even bother reply to ur posts anymore and id like u to the same and not quote me
howlingwolfpaw wrote:cognitive dissonance is what people suffer from when refusing to look at 9/11 truth.
User avatar
United States of America Hidddy_
Retired Contributor
Posts: 379
Joined: Jan 9, 2017
ESO: Hidalgito
Location: Miami, Florida, USA

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Hidddy_ »

ocemilky wrote:
Hidddy_ wrote: dicktator's 40 in 10 scenario


rip @Gichtenlord


Was I misinformed? I saw a stream once where he talked about the scenario, he was talking like it was his :P

Guess I shouldn't assume
De Funk
User avatar
Canada _NiceKING_
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sep 16, 2015
ESO: _NiceKING_
GameRanger ID: 9999999
Clan: Xbox

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by _NiceKING_ »

Hidddy_ wrote:
ocemilky wrote:
Hidddy_ wrote: dicktator's 40 in 10 scenario


rip @Gichtenlord


Was I misinformed? I saw a stream once where he talked about the scenario, he was talking like it was his :P

Guess I shouldn't assume

viewtopic.php?f=176&t=10190
New Zealand Colonel Concrete
Crossbow
Posts: 19
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
Location: Downunder (Aus/NZ)

Re: why people play treaty?

  • Quote

Post by Colonel Concrete »

First post, new on here. Be nice!

Oh, and keep the Treaty.

Lake_69 wrote:Adding myself to the treaty fan brigade. Live & let live I say

+1

In fact they should EXPAND it if anything; why not allow up to say a 60min treaty?

I am getting good-ish* at treaty and have barely finished building a robust base with a good first attack at the 40min mark (starting from Discovery age).
If treaty is about post-imperial madness /base building, then why not allow even more time to get it perfect?!

Allowing 60min (or even say 90min!) would allow new/noob players more time :) - which might be more fun for them. I might stick to 20/30/40min myself but hey give 'em the choice I say.

In fact, it's all about choice... why remove treaty if you can simply choose not to play it?
Get over yourselves whoever wants to ban it! Let others do what they like (while you sit on your high-horse..)

Its effectively just a different game play style. And I happen to like it

Agree: the Devs should better balance the Civs for AOE3 DE/AOE4, and also allow more than 2 teams.
Also, regarding the AI in treaty: the Devs could make the AI much better in treaty by changing their strategy accordingly (including, especially, the home city card choice).

Regarding lag in online/network treaty games: this is more a problem of any of: the game programming, the internet connection, or the user computer specs, than the game mode itself.

deleted_user wrote:@mods, its fucking disgusting and disrespectf that you guys removed my poll, who did it?

Aside: For those of you who joined here a while ago, you may have forgotten this little registration blurb so I'll post it up for your convenience:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated.."
"You agree that “ESOCommunity” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit.."


( *: I say 'good-ish' as I'm new-ish and have just beat 7x expert allied AI with a +100% resource handicap each, with usual tactics (not using Aklaks wall-madness or pause-micro etc). I'm probably not so good against human players though! Unless playing as OP French, with a long treaty period, haha! And even then probably not so good!..).
No Flag deleted_user
Ninja
Posts: 14364
Joined: Mar 26, 2015

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by deleted_user »

I like your name.

Concrete is cool.
User avatar
Germany QueenOfdestiny
Retired Contributor
Posts: 2139
Joined: Aug 9, 2016
ESO: QueenOfdestiny

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by QueenOfdestiny »

Nr 60 is definitely enough :ugly:
shit juice :hmm:
Austria Foire421
Skirmisher
Posts: 126
Joined: Jul 27, 2016
ESO: foire421

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Foire421 »

No tr mode= a lot of saved time and money for me! not gonna buy some bullshit game that has no tr mode! in that case hello rl and fuck aoe!
New Zealand Colonel Concrete
Crossbow
Posts: 19
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
Location: Downunder (Aus/NZ)

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Colonel Concrete »

deleted_user wrote:I like your name.

Concrete is cool.

Cheers! Somehow this was the first thing that came to mind..

(Although I'm not sure they had concrete, as we know it, at this point in time (AOE3 period); perhaps for AOE4?! - although it might start to look a little like Command and Conquer (/Red Alert) by then... where else can AOE get to after AOE3?!)
User avatar
Germany Lukas_L99
Pro Player
Donator 01
Posts: 2059
Joined: Nov 15, 2015
ESO: Lukas_L99
Location: Lübeck

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Lukas_L99 »

Foire421 wrote:No tr mode= a lot of saved time and money for me! not gonna buy some bullshit game that has no tr mode! in that case hello rl and fuck aoe!


Nice try, you're gonna buy it anyways
Austria Foire421
Skirmisher
Posts: 126
Joined: Jul 27, 2016
ESO: foire421

Re: why people play treaty?

Post by Foire421 »

Lukas_L99 wrote:
Foire421 wrote:No tr mode= a lot of saved time and money for me! not gonna buy some bullshit game that has no tr mode! in that case hello rl and fuck aoe!


Nice try, you're gonna buy it anyways


shhh dont tell em pls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV