Acolyte wrote:InsectPoison wrote:howlingwolfpaw wrote:i played this acoylte feller once, on andes we wouldnt allow sioux but he agreed to not box, then of cource he did, so he and his team mates cheated, not trust worthy, got pested.
Yeah, shes a dirty stinkin liar.
First @
InsectPoison the host did not write any rule on game title or saying or writee before the game started, even I dont need the box, that dosent mean I wont box. Learn to deal with it if you cant hold it then return to nilla with poeple with corner rule. however pesting poeple because you guys dont like the cheap tactic its called Hypocrisy
@
fei123456 Its just a game, you guys take this game too much seriously, Also I dont play for pr anymoore from very long time ago and aoe3 elorating its not accurated for stats etc because there was no elorating in 2006.
But if you guys feel soo desespered to get pr such nilla poeple as example, I can give you free win. But I would said you guys for those who take this game too much serious. Then the problem its not from me
this is where you get your wrap as a liar because you refuse to be apologetic to the point that WE ALL AGREED you would NOT start with a dog box. Other wise we were not going to green up.
That was foul play. CHEATING> We did not counter it because we expected to fight in middle like good games go, not lame box strat. And i would not have been india because Dog box is most OP thing for them to counter. Its like matching up a france with a china and says I wont use gends, then all he does is gend spam.
talk about desperation? who is the one cheating people for better PR that artificially inflates ones ego while ruining game play? I do not want your win, or anyones, I want good battles with cool players. Its sad to see that this many people feel burned by you