TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5788
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by evilcheadar »

Lancers have low base hand damage so guess what? Hussars can beat them fairly well! There's around a 20 damage difference so feel free to counter lancers with some hussar. The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by gustavusadolphus »

What about port hussars !?!??!?!?!!?
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5788
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by evilcheadar »

gustavusadolphus wrote:What about port hussars !?!??!?!?!!?

Use em' they have ~64 damage where lancers have ~44
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
Czech Republic EAGLEMUT
ESOC Dev Team
Donator 05
Posts: 4515
Joined: Mar 31, 2015
ESO: EAGLEMUT
Clan: WPact

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by EAGLEMUT »

I think this tip applies to supremacy as well.
Image
momuuu wrote: theres no way eaglemut is truly a top player
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5788
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by evilcheadar »

EAGLEMUT wrote:I think this tip applies to supremacy as well.

Yep thought of that a minute after I posted
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by pecelot »

evilcheadar wrote:The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:

Are lancers mounted pikemen? lol
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by momuuu »

yeah lancers are specialist cav so they do meh against hussars. Just like naginatas, sowars, mahout and iron flails (and maybe also steppes too? those suck in general) get countered (albeit softcountered) by hussars. Ranged cav is still the most efficient answer but hussars indeed do surprisingly well.
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5788
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by evilcheadar »

pecelot wrote:
evilcheadar wrote:The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:

Are lancers mounted pikemen? lol

A pike is different from a lance I'm pretty sure but they're both long sharpshish things so why not call them mounted pikemen. Also I like to think of gendarmes as mounted doppelsoldners
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by iNcog »

Jerom wrote:yeah lancers are specialist cav so they do meh against hussars. Just like naginatas, sowars, mahout and iron flails (and maybe also steppes too? those suck in general) get countered (albeit softcountered) by hussars. Ranged cav is still the most efficient answer but hussars indeed do surprisingly well.


sensible post
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote:
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by gustavusadolphus »

Historical speaking a Pike is much longer then the ones presented in game with Swiss pikenen having the longest Pike's. I know slightly more modern Lance's had a much smaller point, however those lancers did not have armor like the ones in game.
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by gustavusadolphus »

Here is an interesting image of some lancers of the US civil war.
Attachments
valverde_lancers.jpg
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
User avatar
No Flag Jaeger
Jaeger
Posts: 4492
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by Jaeger »

gustavusadolphus wrote:Here is an interesting image of some lancers of the US civil war.

They probably didnt have armor for the same reasons none of the other soldiers had armor, which is the innefectiveness of armor against guns
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
User avatar
United States of America gustavusadolphus
Lancer
Posts: 520
Joined: Oct 19, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by gustavusadolphus »

ovi12 wrote:
gustavusadolphus wrote:Here is an interesting image of some lancers of the US civil war.

They probably didnt have armor for the same reasons none of the other soldiers had armor, which is the innefectiveness of armor against guns


yesh just wanted to show the sharp comparison in tech the game displays.
10000 gallon fiberglass, FNS plus DE filter 48 square foot, ray pack Mini Max 512 BTU gas heater, one Sip n Oodle, NO ZEOSAND
No Flag deuxballesman
Dragoon
Posts: 349
Joined: Aug 21, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by deuxballesman »

Jerom wrote:yeah lancers are specialist cav so they do meh against hussars. Just like naginatas, sowars, mahout and iron flails (and maybe also steppes too? those suck in general) get countered (albeit softcountered) by hussars. Ranged cav is still the most efficient answer but hussars indeed do surprisingly well.

Opris have the same problem you never wanna engage smth that isn't a vil or a building
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by momuuu »

deuxballesman wrote:
Jerom wrote:yeah lancers are specialist cav so they do meh against hussars. Just like naginatas, sowars, mahout and iron flails (and maybe also steppes too? those suck in general) get countered (albeit softcountered) by hussars. Ranged cav is still the most efficient answer but hussars indeed do surprisingly well.

Opris have the same problem you never wanna engage smth that isn't a vil or a building

Dont they have a bonus against artillery?
User avatar
France P i k i l i c
Howdah
Posts: 1271
Joined: Nov 17, 2015
ESO: Pikilic
Location: Dijon, France
GameRanger ID: 7497456

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by P i k i l i c »

Jerom wrote:Dont they have a bonus against artillery?

Yes oprichniks have *2 against artillery and siege units
Consider not the one who speaks the truth, but the truth that is said

:hmm: AoE logic :hmm:
No Flag deuxballesman
Dragoon
Posts: 349
Joined: Aug 21, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by deuxballesman »

Yes but i would try to flank canons with opris. If you find two canons isolated (that shouldn't happen but who knows) kill them! Opris are cav after all.
My point was don't engage a fight with opris. (Canon vs cav is hardly one)
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by pecelot »

evilcheadar wrote:
pecelot wrote:
evilcheadar wrote:The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:

Are lancers mounted pikemen? lol

A pike is different from a lance I'm pretty sure but they're both long sharpshish things so why not call them mounted pikemen. Also I like to think of gendarmes as mounted doppelsoldners

Yeah, in these terms of course, I thought about the game context, where pikemen are good against cavalry while lancers aren't, although in reality — as you mentioned — you can call them „mounted pikemen".

deuxballesman wrote:
Jerom wrote:yeah lancers are specialist cav so they do meh against hussars. Just like naginatas, sowars, mahout and iron flails (and maybe also steppes too? those suck in general) get countered (albeit softcountered) by hussars. Ranged cav is still the most efficient answer but hussars indeed do surprisingly well.

Opris have the same problem you never wanna engage smth that isn't a vil or a building


They are also useful in situations when hand cav just rek, no matter what the stats are, like against bare skirms.
No Flag deuxballesman
Dragoon
Posts: 349
Joined: Aug 21, 2015

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by deuxballesman »

Even against bare skirms i wouldn't use opris too much they are best kept hidden as much as you can and tgen raid like crazy with it. In sup you rarely have more than 10 opri at a time and this amount don't do well at all even against 25-30 skirm due to their very low attack
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by pecelot »

Yeah, but sometimes you can catch opponent's batch of skirms, espiecially when you raid near his base. I've played recently against some Russ and 6 opris shipment in fortress wasn't that rare I have to admit.
User avatar
United States of America dicktator_
Howdah
EWT
Posts: 1565
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
ESO: Conquerer999

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by dicktator_ »

evilcheadar wrote:Lancers have low base hand damage so guess what? Hussars can beat them fairly well! There's around a 20 damage difference so feel free to counter lancers with some hussar. The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:
Hussars actually do kill lancers really well, even port hussars do ok. If your opponent mixes rods and/or huamincas properly you'll have a problem though.
steniothejonjoe wrote:I can micro better than 99% of the player base and that's 100% objective
:mds:
United States of America evilcheadar
Gendarme
Posts: 5788
Joined: Aug 20, 2015
Location: USA

Re: TOTW #3: Not using hussars to counter lancers sometimes in treaty is bad

Post by evilcheadar »

dicktator_ wrote:
evilcheadar wrote:Lancers have low base hand damage so guess what? Hussars can beat them fairly well! There's around a 20 damage difference so feel free to counter lancers with some hussar. The lancers won't get a bonus vs your cav even tho they are kind of like mounted pikemen. :idea:
Hussars actually do kill lancers really well, even port hussars do ok. If your opponent mixes rods and/or huamincas properly you'll have a problem though.

Yesh that's why I made the tip!
A post not made is a post given away

A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay

Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV