Not legit boom scores

United States of America Metis
Howdah
Posts: 1661
Joined: Mar 28, 2015

Re: Not legit boom scores

Post by Metis »

What part of "for fun" don't you guys understand. Sheesh, you act as if this game was the most important thing in your lives.
User avatar
Great Britain britishmusketeer
Howdah
Posts: 1845
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: Not legit boom scores

Post by britishmusketeer »

Metis wrote:What part of "for fun" don't you guys understand. Sheesh, you act as if this game was the most important thing in your lives.

You were disagreeing with people saying mercs were bad. People weren't arguing as to whether they were 'fun' or not.
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: Not legit boom scores

Post by pecelot »

I get your point of view, but making bad units on purpose sometimes just irritates me rather than makes me pleasure.
United States of America Metis
Howdah
Posts: 1661
Joined: Mar 28, 2015

Re: Not legit boom scores

Post by Metis »

But mercs aren't necessarily all that bad sometimes, even in Imperial age. For instance, the Port Hussar is pretty weak. When faced by massed Longbowmen, and if they happen to be available at the Saloon, I usually make several Elmeti, to good effect.
User avatar
No Flag howlingwolfpaw
Jaeger
Posts: 3476
Joined: Oct 4, 2015

Re: Not legit boom scores

Post by howlingwolfpaw »

perhaps mercs should be buffed in the patch. less pop, but better/ higher cost, this would really help players with bigger ecos make that final push once people have drained a little.


but..... I also don't really play the patch.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV