Not legit boom scores
Re: Not legit boom scores
What part of "for fun" don't you guys understand. Sheesh, you act as if this game was the most important thing in your lives.
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Re: Not legit boom scores
Metis wrote:What part of "for fun" don't you guys understand. Sheesh, you act as if this game was the most important thing in your lives.
You were disagreeing with people saying mercs were bad. People weren't arguing as to whether they were 'fun' or not.
Re: Not legit boom scores
I get your point of view, but making bad units on purpose sometimes just irritates me rather than makes me pleasure.
Re: Not legit boom scores
But mercs aren't necessarily all that bad sometimes, even in Imperial age. For instance, the Port Hussar is pretty weak. When faced by massed Longbowmen, and if they happen to be available at the Saloon, I usually make several Elmeti, to good effect.
- howlingwolfpaw
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Oct 4, 2015
Re: Not legit boom scores
perhaps mercs should be buffed in the patch. less pop, but better/ higher cost, this would really help players with bigger ecos make that final push once people have drained a little.
but..... I also don't really play the patch.
but..... I also don't really play the patch.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests