Strongest civ in the late colonial
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Strongest civ in the late colonial
depends how late in colonial xD
Strongest civ in the late colonial
Jap will be maxed out at: 75 villagers (-6 starting and -8 from cards) = 61, and 61* 25sec/vill = 1525 seconds. To gather the first 100f let's say 10 sec = 1535 sec. : (60sec/min) = 25 minutes and 35 seconds.
India will be maxed out at (99 villagers - 6 starting -1 for each shipment, normally you have 13-14 shipments) = 80, *25sec/vill = 2000seconds. To gather the first 100w let's say 10 sec = 2010 sec. 60sec/min) = 33 minutes and 30 seconds.
India will be maxed out at (99 villagers - 6 starting -1 for each shipment, normally you have 13-14 shipments) = 80, *25sec/vill = 2000seconds. To gather the first 100w let's say 10 sec = 2010 sec. 60sec/min) = 33 minutes and 30 seconds.
Last edited by _venox_ on 20 Jun 2015, 09:39, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: IamSoldier suddenly cares about mi grammer
Reason: IamSoldier suddenly cares about mi grammer
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
I'd say late colonial happens before that already.
Maybe late colonial starts after like the 5th or 6th shipment? It's all about how you define it. Also, it's hard to compare India and Japan without starting to talk about the match up. But I don't think the match up is really relevant given the question, so stuff like "india should destroy Japan shrines" is kinda hard to value.
Honestly, I really don't have a clue how these could be compared within the topic. You'd kinda have to isolate the civs late-colonial from whatever normally happens in the game, and try to decide which one is better, which is hard.
Maybe late colonial starts after like the 5th or 6th shipment? It's all about how you define it. Also, it's hard to compare India and Japan without starting to talk about the match up. But I don't think the match up is really relevant given the question, so stuff like "india should destroy Japan shrines" is kinda hard to value.
Honestly, I really don't have a clue how these could be compared within the topic. You'd kinda have to isolate the civs late-colonial from whatever normally happens in the game, and try to decide which one is better, which is hard.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Strongest civ in the late colonial
india gather from hunts, and dont bombard me with those stats they dont mean anything to me lol
Strongest civ in the late colonial
What is this 61.25 sec per vil for jap and 25sec per vil India...venox wrote:Jap will be maxed out at: 75 villagers (-6 starting and -8 from cards) = 61, * 61.25sec/vill = 1525 seconds. To gather the first 100f let''s say 10 sec = 1535 sec. : (60sec/min) = 25 minutes and 35 seconds.
India will be maxed out at (99 villagers - 6 starting -1 for each shipment, normally you have 13-14 shipments) = 80, *25sec/vill = 2000seconds. To gather the first 100w let''s say 10 sec = 2010 sec. 60sec/min) = 33 minutes and 30 seconds.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
Its probably just a mistype, he actually used the correct number for japan (25s) in the calculation, 61 * 25 = 1525 like he gotiamsoldier wrote:What is this 61.25 sec per vil for jap and 25sec per vil India...venox wrote:Jap will be maxed out at: 75 villagers (-6 starting and -8 from cards) = 61, * 61.25sec/vill = 1525 seconds. To gather the first 100f lets say 10 sec = 1535 sec. : (60sec/min) = 25 minutes and 35 seconds.
India will be maxed out at (99 villagers - 6 starting -1 for each shipment, normally you have 13-14 shipments) = 80, *25sec/vill = 2000seconds. To gather the first 100w lets say 10 sec = 2010 sec. 60sec/min) = 33 minutes and 30 seconds.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Strongest civ in the late colonial
Corrected now. My point was that japan maxes out on economy earlier and with the shrines that you spam earlier on Japan has the better economy (20 shrines + 75 villagers at about 25 minutes as opposed to 33 minutes. Only when maxed out India is leading in economy and until then Japan is ahead + the infinite resource factor, but -gathers berries.
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
It''s advantage, but its not that huge since Japan gets upgrades for berries. Without upgrades, I think hunting is about twice as fast as berries, but with berry upgrades it isn''t that big of a deal (don''t know the exact numbers though). Since hunting also requires you to move from hunt to hunt and waste a few vill seconds on that, maybe the gathering rates are surprisingly even.hazza54321 wrote:india gather from hunts, and dont bombard me with those stats they dont mean anything to me lol
Strongest civ in the late colonial
it is 0.67 food per second from berries vs 0.84 food per second from hunts for regular villagers.
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
It''s probably more relevnt to calculate it after applying the upgrades, because the difference will get bigger then. I just don''t know the percentages of the upgrades.venox wrote:it is 0.67 food per second from berries vs 0.84 food per second from hunts for regular villagers.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
no it won't get bigger because both are asian civs with the same market upgrades
the difference in % will stay the same, which is about 25% bigger. If A = 1.25*B, then x*A = 1.25*x*B too, x stands for the market upgrades in %.
the difference in % will stay the same, which is about 25% bigger. If A = 1.25*B, then x*A = 1.25*x*B too, x stands for the market upgrades in %.
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
but the absolute difference is what matters imo, because you have to take walking time into account.venox wrote:no it won''t get bigger because both are asian civs with the same market upgrades
the difference in % will stay the same, which is about 25% bigger. If A = 1.25*B, then x*A = 1.25*x*B too, x stands for the market upgrades in %.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
Yes walking time has a bigger impact the higher the gather rates but you can't calculate that and walking time doesn't have that big of an impact between A and x*A. And no it's not the absolute difference that matters, it's the units you will get when the resources are spent which too are affected by the same percentage x.
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
They are but late Colonial that isn''t a problem with Japanese.hazza54321 wrote:well shrines are vulnerable(efficient ones), india get a vill with each shipment, 4 vill from cons, 7 vill worth of wood tricles, french consulate, karni mata(optional), they tend to get their market ups earlier.
And depends how late but japs can only get 75vills whist india gets 103
Strongest civ in the late colonial
There is no chance Russians can maintain double BH and Stables production when British are first able to maintain double Barracks and single Stables (at about 12-13 minutes). Theres just no way. Resources gathered means everything as far as economy is concerned. Units being cost effective is a military advantage' I am discussing resources gathered strictly and full Colonial Age economy British and Russians economies should be very close, and not in clearly in favor of Russians.garja wrote:By thetime brits is spamming from 2 raxes and 1 stable, Russia is spamming from 2bh and 2 stables, thats superior eco. Res line doesnt mean that much if the other units are way more cost effective.zoom wrote:I never said Russians Colonial Age full economy is bad' I said and am still saying I dont see how it is by any means superior to the British, and your above points have little to nothing to do with Colonial Age full economy, although they certainly help a lot before that point.
Also India maxed colonial eco is even stronger than japanese one. The eco (or the units) is not what win games for Japan in that MU.
And we are not discussing about colonial age full economy anymore really, as there isnt even a point that defines it (technically it should be at 99 vills with all market ups and cards, which means all euro civs have roughly same eco).
We are rather talking of how civ realistically scale in late colonial.
Indians full Colonial Age economy might be about even with the Japanese but before that point they arent really close presuming Shrines with gatherers.
Thats fine, so long as its defined. In those terms Russians are close and Japanese are ahead IMO.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
zoom wrote:There is no chance Russians can maintain double BH and Stables production when British are first able to maintain double Barracks and single Stables (at about 12-13 minutes). There''s just no way. Resources gathered means everything as far as economy is concerned. Units being cost effective is a military advantage' I am discussing resources gathered strictly and full Colonial Age economy British and Russians economies should be very close, and not in clearly in favor of Russians.
Indians'' full Colonial Age economy might be about even with the Japanese but before that point they aren''t really close presuming Shrines with gatherers.
That''s fine, so long as it''s defined. In those terms Russians are close and Japanese are ahead IMO.
Trust me that Russia has the eco to do that, I guess you miss the right build.
And India eco is always pretty even with the jap one. Again I think you miss the right India build. In real games btw India rushes japan so they get ahead even.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
You're absolutely convinced Russians are able to maintain dual infantry and cavalry production by the time the British are first able to maintain dual infantry and single cavalry production. Am I reading that correctly? Considering how quickly units train in batches that would require not only a good enough economy to produce more cycles concurrently, but to additionally spend more resources per time on units...
Strongest civ in the late colonial
yes youre right when you say its about the res gathered and not the income per minute, but it actually is about res and how efficient you can spend them. If one player can trade his strelets for the enemy xbows cost efficiently, this means that the russian player got more out of his 2000 res in strelets and traded it against 3000 res in xbows. Imagine a civ that gets musketeers for 2/3 the usual cost' the enemy needs to outgather said imaginative nation by (2/3)^-1 = by 50% if all they train are musketeers. To be clear:zoom wrote:There is no chance Russians can maintain double BH and Stables production when British are first able to maintain double Barracks and single Stables (at about 12-13 minutes). Theres just no way. Resources gathered means everything as far as economy is concerned. Units being cost effective is a military advantage' I am discussing resources gathered strictly and full Colonial Age economy British and Russians economies should be very close, and not in clearly in favor of Russians.garja wrote:By thetime brits is spamming from 2 raxes and 1 stable, Russia is spamming from 2bh and 2 stables, thats superior eco. Res line doesnt mean that much if the other units are way more cost effective.
Also India maxed colonial eco is even stronger than japanese one. The eco (or the units) is not what win games for Japan in that MU.
And we are not discussing about colonial age full economy anymore really, as there isnt even a point that defines it (technically it should be at 99 vills with all market ups and cards, which means all euro civs have roughly same eco).
We are rather talking of how civ realistically scale in late colonial.
Indians full Colonial Age economy might be about even with the Japanese but before that point they arent really close presuming Shrines with gatherers.
Thats fine, so long as its defined. In those terms Russians are close and Japanese are ahead IMO.
Nation A: (2000 res per minute) divided by 1 musketeer per (2/3)*100res = 30 musketeers per minute.
Nation B: 30 musketeers per minute times 100res per musketeer = 3000 res per minute
3000 divided by 2000 = 50% more resources needed just to have the same army strength.
This example is quite far off reality but it shows you the impact of having cost efficient units. So its the resources (income, crates, trickles etc) * cost effectiveness (units, upgrades)+ free army that matters
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
The thing is that you use 700 w 700g 600w/600g to fuel your production while you''re also upping the tp line and you have steel traps. So ye you have enough res income at one point.zoom wrote:You''re absolutely convinced Russians are able to maintain dual infantry and cavalry production by the time the British are first able to maintain dual infantry and single cavalry production. Am I reading that correctly? Considering how quickly units train in batches that would require not only a good enough economy to produce more cycles concurrently, but to additionally spend more resources per time on units...
Perhaps not constant 2-2 production but something like mixed 2-0,2-1, 2-2 is certainly possible. Brits struggle to make full batches out of 3 buildings anyway vs Russia.
Strongest civ in the late colonial
First of all i gave you all the reasons why india eco>'= jap eco with shrines with proper aoe3 gameplay logic before moving on to what you call personal attack.zoom wrote:More unsupported personal attacks. Stay classy kid. The only thing Im "blinded" by is the idea that I, entirely unlike you, provide logical arguments when making a point.mnogud wrote:and dont even think you countered others... u are just blinded by the idea that your always right...
Pro tip: Try to counter my arguments with logic instead of making personal attacks because Im disagreeing with Garja.
Secondly it is not a pro tip when it comes from someone like you (You can take this as a personal attack, for all I care )
And lastly I agree you provide logical arguments but they are not correct many a times. None of the PROS like Garja agree with your shit and yet you argue like you are more experienced than them even though you are a fly in front of them. Your arguments, which you proudly call logical are solely based on how you play the game with probably people of your level or based on how you would play that civ. GG
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests