The Big Names Missing

blackbob68 · Post by **blackbob68** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:14

Nah, Erik thinks Jap/ India is too strong, he cant win vs those civs, but just ask him yourself. Im sure he will give you a proper answer, like veni did

Btw Veni, other topic perhaps but Id like to see some more "full lame games" where everyone plays lame civs

(In your random 3v3s I mean)

blackbob68 · Post by **blackbob68** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:15

"the veni civs" haha, had to laugh a bit

no offence veni^^

blackbob68 · Post by **blackbob68** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:15

Ah and btw: mighty Fard signed up

deleted_user0 · Post by **deleted_user0** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:18

venividivici wrote:Lol Neuron, didnt expect you would go like this, bringing this up out of context ^^

That Mr Lame himself, AKA Umeu comes with that i get. He thinks he is op by using iro, otto and some india to get brig in 1/1, wp...

I have always been advocating fair play, cause we have to work with the issues the game has, to make it fun for all. And whether that means no lame civs (or 1 lame civ per team as we often do in teamgame), its fine for me. Also many others agree with that. Whats the point of getting owned by some otto/india abus gun sepoy composition for example? You are likely to loose because of civs not skill. Same in 1/1. I know Umeu likes to iro rush people to boost his ego, but it doesnt mean he really outplayed his opponent.

Furthermore in your list neuron, china is also np. Or just both teams or in 1v1 both a ''lame'' civ, fine too. At least makes it pretty fair again.

And if we play a tournament and want more variety, then sure we can bring more civs into play. Like the rules are now, they are pretty ok. Its never possible to get it perfect and everyone happy.

Haha so much blabla from eso''s white knight veni. I asked u so many times to 1v1 euro civs and u always dodge. Iirc the last game we played was brit mirror and u got raped son. Fk even rusty i will trash u worse than somppu, using veni rules too rofl. Or u can play a lame civ to make it fair, i know u do it if it gets u a win,though ofc u wont win a game and u know it. Dont let that lucky 3rd place get to ur head son, being beaten by cn bluejays is closer to ur true skill lvl

blackbob68 · Post by **blackbob68** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:19

shots fired

Where did this come from^^

Durokan · Post by **Durokan** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:19

this thread :c i just asked a simple question i didnt mean to start a flame war
[img]http://emblemsbf.com/img/50724.jpg[/img]
Your answer was nice thanks veni

_DB_ · Post by **_DB_** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:23

Better ban lame strats rather than lame civs.

samwise12 · Post by **samwise12** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:23

[attachment id="624" thumbnail="1"]
mankle approves of this thread

blackbob68 · Post by **blackbob68** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:25

haha sam stop with this photo

:D:D

Veni_Vidi_Vici_W · Post by **Veni_Vidi_Vici_W** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:31

[quote author="@Umeu"][div][/div][div][/div][div][/div][div][/div]Haha so much blabla from eso's white knight veni. I asked u so many times to 1v1 euro civs and u always dodge. Iirc the last game we played was brit mirror and u got raped son. Fk even rusty i will trash u worse than somppu, using veni rules too rofl. Or u can play a lame civ to make it fair, i know u do it if it gets u a win,though ofc u wont win a game and u know it. Dont let that lucky 3rd place get to ur head son, being beaten by cn bluejays is closer to ur true skill lvl[/quote]Fact 1. I dont like you, because of your attitude and because you lame so much. Proof of the latter is in your elo.

Fact 2. Regardless of our personal issues, i dont mix them with judging a player. I know you can play good still, but you are far from OP. You could be better than me perhaps, sure. You have a lot more 1/1 experience than I have and i dont consider myself that much as a 1/1 player.

Fact 3. We played i think 2 brits mirrors max. One colonial and one you went semi 3rd. I won first you won second, not sure?

Fact 4. I dont use a lame civ if it gets me a win, you can find that in elo. Unlike you, using iro jap otto india in 1/1 almost exclusively to boost your rank? If you are so good then use a civ like russia as Darwin did, or how Erik reaches higher ranks than you without going iro/otto etc.

Fac 5. I never said I was OP, i just can play good. And getting 3rd in last tourney doesnt change that. In fact, i mentioned live in the stream and later in some threads as well how my path was etc.

Conclusion, no point arguing with you since you cant get your facts straight.

Jaeger · Post by **Jaeger** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:31

venividivici wrote:Lol Neuron, didnt expect you would go like this, bringing this up out of context ^^

That Mr Lame himself, AKA Umeu comes with that i get. He thinks he is op by using iro, otto and some india to get brig in 1/1, wp...

I have always been advocating fair play, cause we have to work with the issues the game has, to make it fun for all. And whether that means no lame civs (or 1 lame civ per team as we often do in teamgame), its fine for me. Also many others agree with that. Whats the point of getting owned by some otto/india abus gun sepoy composition for example? You are likely to loose because of civs not skill. Same in 1/1. I know Umeu likes to iro rush people to boost his ego, but it doesnt mean he really outplayed his opponent.

Furthermore in your list neuron, china is also np. Or just both teams or in 1v1 both a ''lame'' civ, fine too. At least makes it pretty fair again.

And if we play a tournament and want more variety, then sure we can bring more civs into play. Like the rules are now, they are pretty ok. Its never possible to get it perfect and everyone happy.
As btw (Umeu pay attention so you get your arguments straight), last tourney i also agreed to let more civs be played.

y u think india lame in 1v1

. Also isn''t brit super lame in team game but nobody complains?

momuuu · Post by **momuuu** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:33

umeu wrote:
venividivici wrote:Lol Neuron, didnt expect you would go like this, bringing this up out of context ^^

That Mr Lame himself, AKA Umeu comes with that i get. He thinks he is op by using iro, otto and some india to get brig in 1/1, wp...

I have always been advocating fair play, cause we have to work with the issues the game has, to make it fun for all. And whether that means no lame civs (or 1 lame civ per team as we often do in teamgame), its fine for me. Also many others agree with that. Whats the point of getting owned by some otto/india abus gun sepoy composition for example? You are likely to loose because of civs not skill. Same in 1/1. I know Umeu likes to iro rush people to boost his ego, but it doesnt mean he really outplayed his opponent.

Furthermore in your list neuron, china is also np. Or just both teams or in 1v1 both a lame civ, fine too. At least makes it pretty fair again.

And if we play a tournament and want more variety, then sure we can bring more civs into play. Like the rules are now, they are pretty ok. Its never possible to get it perfect and everyone happy.

Haha so much blabla from esos white knight veni. I asked u so many times to 1v1 euro civs and u always dodge. Iirc the last game we played was brit mirror and u got raped son. Fk even rusty i will trash u worse than somppu, using veni rules too rofl. Or u can play a lame civ to make it fair, i know u do it if it gets u a win,though ofc u wont win a game and u know it. Dont let that lucky 3rd place get to ur head son, being beaten by cn bluejays is closer to ur true skill lvl

You msut be raelly good. You even make the mighty rafuuuu resign in 0:00. So skilled player.

samwise12 · Post by **samwise12** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:35

brits are far from lame, they have no abusable units lategame like alot of other civs

_DB_ · Post by **_DB_** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:35

ovi12 wrote:
venividivici wrote:Lol Neuron, didnt expect you would go like this, bringing this up out of context ^^

That Mr Lame himself, AKA Umeu comes with that i get. He thinks he is op by using iro, otto and some india to get brig in 1/1, wp...

I have always been advocating fair play, cause we have to work with the issues the game has, to make it fun for all. And whether that means no lame civs (or 1 lame civ per team as we often do in teamgame), its fine for me. Also many others agree with that. Whats the point of getting owned by some otto/india abus gun sepoy composition for example? You are likely to loose because of civs not skill. Same in 1/1. I know Umeu likes to iro rush people to boost his ego, but it doesnt mean he really outplayed his opponent.

Furthermore in your list neuron, china is also np. Or just both teams or in 1v1 both a lame civ, fine too. At least makes it pretty fair again.

And if we play a tournament and want more variety, then sure we can bring more civs into play. Like the rules are now, they are pretty ok. Its never possible to get it perfect and everyone happy.
As btw (Umeu pay attention so you get your arguments straight), last tourney i also agreed to let more civs be played.
y u think india lame in 1v1 . Also isnt brit super lame in team game but nobody complains?

+1.
Japan is even lame than Brit in team.

mnogud · Post by **mnogud** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:35

venividivici wrote:Lol Neuron, didnt expect you would go like this, bringing this up out of context ^^

That Mr Lame himself, AKA Umeu comes with that i get. He thinks he is op by using iro, otto and some india to get brig in 1/1, wp...

I have always been advocating fair play, cause we have to work with the issues the game has, to make it fun for all. And whether that means no lame civs (or 1 lame civ per team as we often do in teamgame), its fine for me. Also many others agree with that. Whats the point of getting owned by some otto/india abus gun sepoy composition for example? You are likely to loose because of civs not skill. Same in 1/1. I know Umeu likes to iro rush people to boost his ego, but it doesnt mean he really outplayed his opponent.

Furthermore in your list neuron, china is also np. Or just both teams or in 1v1 both a ''lame'' civ, fine too. At least makes it pretty fair again.

And if we play a tournament and want more variety, then sure we can bring more civs into play. Like the rules are now, they are pretty ok. Its never possible to get it perfect and everyone happy.
As btw (Umeu pay attention so you get your arguments straight), last tourney i also agreed to let more civs be played.

iirc you urself told that he has skills though he likes to lame a lot :p Anyway next smackdown veni vs umeu euro civs ?

@calmyourtits

mnogud · Post by **mnogud** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:38

@umeu i dont think you can beat veni that easy :p

Goodspeed · Post by **Goodspeed** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:38

They have to play now, right? (:))

Kind of an unnecessary flame veni, umeu is a good player. Makes a lot of sense to lame if you take the game seriously since it's the best way to win.. Banning the strongest civs is not exactly normal for competitive tournaments in any game, for the record. But we're special ')

mnogud · Post by **mnogud** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:39

@Veni_Vidi_Vici_W india japan not lame

just strong but requires skills. you can call iro otto lame as you like ^ ^

Jaeger · Post by **Jaeger** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:44

YESSS UMEU VS VENI SMACKDOWN PLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

mnogud · Post by **mnogud** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:46

ovi12 wrote:YESSS UMEU VS VENI SMACKDOWN PLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

+1 and all euro civs

Veni_Vidi_Vici_W · Post by **Veni_Vidi_Vici_W** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:46

@GS, your comment makes no sense here. I already said that in a tournament you ofc go for the best civs and try to use any way possible to win. However, thats different in my opinion in other custom games and also regardless of that i have more respect for people like Darwin who beat many ppl with Russia than if you use civs like iro otto.

But ok, thread is derailing fast again. Back to we need more bigger names to convince to play ^^

iNcog · Post by **iNcog** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:48

good thread, good thread

some nice healthy banter in here and it's good to see this. quite good, quite good

umeu, can you back that up? bo5 vs veni & you can use only russia, OK?

deleted_user0 · Post by **deleted_user0** » 19 Jun 2015, 15:48

venividivici wrote:[quote author="@Umeu"][div][/div]Haha so much blabla from eso''s white knight veni. I asked u so many times to 1v1 euro civs and u always dodge. Iirc the last game we played was brit mirror and u got raped son. Fk even rusty i will trash u worse than somppu, using veni rules too rofl. Or u can play a lame civ to make it fair, i know u do it if it gets u a win,though ofc u wont win a game and u know it. Dont let that lucky 3rd place get to ur head son, being beaten by cn bluejays is closer to ur true skill lvl

Fact 1. I dont like you, because of your attitude and because you lame so much. Proof of the latter is in your elo.

Fact 2. Regardless of our personal issues, i dont mix them with judging a player. I know you can play good still, but you are far from OP.

Fact 3. We played i think 2 brits mirrors. One colonial and one you went semi 3rd. I won first you won second. so....?

Fact 4. I dont use a lame civ if it gets me a win, you can find that in elo. Unlike you, using iro jap otto india in 1/1 almost exclusively to boost your rank? If you are so good then use a civ like russia as Darwin did, or how Erik reaches higher ranks than you without going iro/otto etc.

Fac 5. I never said I was OP, i just can play good. And getting 3rd in last tourney doesnt change that. In fact, i mentioned live in the stream and later in some threads as well how my path was etc.

Conclusion, no point arguing with you since you cant get your facts straight.[/quote]

So? Idc that u like me or not lol, i dont like twats high up their horse to lose their virginity either. Its just funny that u always say no lame then play cn in tournament and fail with otto rofl. And then u flame me but when i asked u for 1v1s u never replied. Its easy to trashtalk a d then dodge, man up bro.

I like to play iro otto india cuz its so much fun to bash ppl in qs. If its not qs tho i play any civ and i can beat any player with those civs I never said im op so get ur own shit straight? In any case there are maybe 2 op players in the game right now, so big deal.

Anyway enjoy the shitty 3v3s, maybe in winter we can play the tournament, im already looking forward to bashing u.

ESOC

Top Live Streams

Legacy AoE3