Veto rule idea

[macacoalbino]

Hey guys.

I don't know if this has been discussed already, but this could be implemented in a future invitational to see how itd work.

As of right now, players veto 1 or 2 maps from the chosen map pool in a given round.

What if players choose a map that MUST be played before the veto? Or, in a round in which there are 2 vetoes, insert this choice in between the 2 vetoes?

I dont know how this rule would be actually implemented and how we would have the players' choices formalized though...

Anyways, thoughts?

[QueenOfdestiny]

I would love this!

[yoqpasa]

this was already made in last tournament

[macacoalbino]

this was already made in last tournament

Really? Which one? At what round did it start?

Were people positive about the results it brought?

I have been away from the game since a while, I dunno what happened this year since I was eliminated from last tourney

[yoqpasa]

@macacoalbino viewtopic.php?f=251&t=10969 Spring Championship, here an example

[macacoalbino]

well, that's not what i'm talking about though. What I'm proposing is that there would be a map choice, which you force an opponent NOT to veto that map. They will have to play it no matter what.

[deleted_user0]

Can be nice, but not in conjunction. Should either have 1 map neutral (1st or last map) and then players select the maps they want to play on in turns.

[JakeyBoyTH]

@momuuu I want to play Indonesia every veto