Mr_Bramboy wrote:Blitztreaty is looking like an interesting prospect: why don't you innovate further and try to find ways to attract the supremacy community?
Because Im lazy ._.
If this idiot would do good blitz maps with pink trees... I would for sure do a Blitz-Blitz-tretay-tournament
Mr_Bramboy wrote:Blitztreaty is looking like an interesting prospect: why don't you innovate further and try to find ways to attract the supremacy community?
Because Im lazy ._.
If this idiot would do good blitz maps with pink trees... I would for sure do a Blitz-Blitz-tretay-tournament
Already looked for pink trees, but there are none :/
Mr_Bramboy wrote:Blitztreaty is looking like an interesting prospect: why don't you innovate further and try to find ways to attract the supremacy community?
Because Im lazy ._.
If this idiot would do good blitz maps with pink trees... I would for sure do a Blitz-Blitz-tretay-tournament
Already looked for pink trees, but there are none :/
It's not just because of money that another T2T tournament is unlikely to happen, although that is definitely a factor. It's just effort vs reward. The 2015 treaty cup had upwards of 64 participants. This tournament barely managed 32, and even then we had lots of dropouts. It's gotten to the point where it's not worth the amount of effort it takes to host a tourney.
steniothejonjoe wrote:I can micro better than 99% of the player base and that's 100% objective
dicktator_ wrote:It's not just because of money that another T2T tournament is unlikely to happen, although that is definitely a factor. It's just effort vs reward. The 2015 treaty cup had upwards of 64 participants. This tournament barely managed 32, and even then we had lots of dropouts. It's gotten to the point where it's not worth the amount of effort it takes to host a tourney.
Well i still think about a one-weekend blitz tournament bc i just like it btw... and idk i would do it again for sure... but yeah i don't think a lot of people would play it when there is no "decent price" idk we'll see