sound bug

[gibson]

Show hidden quotes

I don't get it, unless trained so, it's really hard to differentiate between 60 fps and 60+fps, also running games without vsync = killing your graphic cards faster. The extra frames are useless cuz monitors are either 60hz or 144hz, which means effective fps can not be higher than that. so asking a graphic card to render game at 300 fps when you would still get 60 fps or 144 doesn't make sense anyways.

It’s not hard at all to differentiate between 60 and 144 FPS lol. Now in some low motion games it doesn’t really matter, but generally speaking 60 FPS just feels clunky if you’re used to 144. I also have a 240hz monitor but I don’t use that for aoe cause the difference from 144 to 240 is barely noticeable but my 144hz is 1440p and the 240 isn’t. In most games you wanna average close to 300 so that when you hit an FPS trough you still remain above 144.

It takes lot of time to get used to 144 to notice that difference most common folks dont have 144 ghz comp, besides 144 fps ultra graphics is next to impossible

Not really. In a first person shooter anyone will notice it instantly. This is the case for any high motion game. I get 144 frames in just about every game I play and my monitor is even 1440 lol. All you need to get 144 frames in most games in 1080p is a 1060 6gb.

there are games where 1080 struggles at 1080p lol on ultra settings

Yea like gta V, deus X and Rise of the tomb raider and one or two more. The other 99.9% of games run just fine.

[Garja]

Im a bit skeptical on the actual playability at a capped frame rate. Im mostly refering to input lag for example.
I'd say in competitive games you want as many frames as possible and rendered in real time (1 frame pre render) just so that every input is registered and used. Visualy speaking in aoe3 60 vs 144 shouldnt make a difference at all at least for what concerns competitive purposes. Besides most monitors are 60mhz anyway.

[princeofcarthage]

Show hidden quotes

I don't get it, unless trained so, it's really hard to differentiate between 60 fps and 60+fps, also running games without vsync = killing your graphic cards faster. The extra frames are useless cuz monitors are either 60hz or 144hz, which means effective fps can not be higher than that. so asking a graphic card to render game at 300 fps when you would still get 60 fps or 144 doesn't make sense anyways.

It’s not hard at all to differentiate between 60 and 144 FPS lol. Now in some low motion games it doesn’t really matter, but generally speaking 60 FPS just feels clunky if you’re used to 144. I also have a 240hz monitor but I don’t use that for aoe cause the difference from 144 to 240 is barely noticeable but my 144hz is 1440p and the 240 isn’t. In most games you wanna average close to 300 so that when you hit an FPS trough you still remain above 144.

It takes lot of time to get used to 144 to notice that difference most common folks dont have 144 ghz comp, besides 144 fps ultra graphics is next to impossible

Not really. In a first person shooter anyone will notice it instantly. This is the case for any high motion game. I get 144 frames in just about every game I play and my monitor is even 1440 lol. All you need to get 144 frames in most games in 1080p is a 1060 6gb.

there are games where 1080 struggles at 1080p lol on ultra settings

Yea like gta V, deus X and Rise of the tomb raider and one or two more. The other 99.9% of games run just fine.

You basically quoted the only games those matter anyways

[_H2O]

I could see a technical case for Vsybc helping because of how replays work in fast mode.

My sound bug happens when I have other audio sources playing along with the game. I believe that also influences it. I lose sound in team games way more because I listen to music and want to chill. Then I lose sound and play even worse ontop of that, it’s awful.

I think for smoothness and performance of this game and all games really you want a high FPS. It’s not even for what you see but for how well your inputs go into the game.

Not sure if newer games have solved that.

[deleted_user0]

when I didnt have vsync on my laptop used to run this game with over 600 frames per second for some reason, causing my GPU to go into the 95%99 % usage. With vsync turned on it's limited at 60 and the usages is just around 25%. i've never noticed anything about it causing sound bug tho. for me it also seemed to be what ryan said, i noticed soundbug happening way more often when I had music, netflix or youtube on in the background.

[dicktator_]

I could see a technical case for Vsybc helping because of how replays work in fast mode.

My sound bug happens when I have other audio sources playing along with the game. I believe that also influences it. I lose sound in team games way more because I listen to music and want to chill. Then I lose sound and play even worse ontop of that, it’s awful.

I think for smoothness and performance of this game and all games really you want a high FPS. It’s not even for what you see but for how well your inputs go into the game.

Not sure if newer games have solved that.

Yea for other games as well turning off vsync and maxing out FPS makes it run more smoothly.

[gibson]

playing games that involve any time of precision just sucks at 60 fps. playing without sound also sucks. I haven't decided which is worse yet.

[tabben]

Just microsoft stuff. Teaching us spoiled kidz that we can't have everything in life. Frames or sound, make your choice