Kaiserklein wrote:[Armag] diarouga wrote:Garja is known to have some issues with objectivity.
And you're known to have some issues to play without glitches.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:There's not really a «consensus» by the way. Mankle, kaiser, Mitoe, Umeu and you tend to call debatable glitchs cheats, while some other guys, tit, kynesie, dyddy, me and some jap guys find it acceptable.
Yeah, so basically all the cheesy guys. On the one hand you got people playing the game, on the other hand you got people downloading bullshit and abusing bugs.
Btw, using a glitch
is cheating.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:What I'm trying to say, is that there is no objectivity in that process. You can surely argue for the decisions that have been made, but they were made by 5 people agreeing, and one can also argue against these decisions.
If you argue against banning alt d or banning the explo crackshot, you're either a cheater or stupid, or you just want to be controversial.
Haha I expected this kind of answer from you or from garja
What's happening here is that you guys can't deny the truth ( even though as garja said, the choices made have some legitimity) so you go personal.
By the way, I don't have issues playing without glitches, I don't use alt d, fast shooting, and I use building rotator because the EP added it to the game, so I don't know where that comes from
Still, I don't use these because there's an agreement amoung players not to use it, and I know that my opponents won't use it, but I argue against the ESOC decisions to ban building rotator or fast shooting from the game (which is paradoxical since they added the building rotator).
I can be right, I can be wrong, there's no objectivity, just opinions but what's funny is that instead of saying « we decided after discussions to ban these abuses from the game» you make it look like as if there was only one reasonable opinion, your, and you call the others «dumb» or «cheesy».
That's the strategy dictators use against their opponents actually, they impose their ideas, and call the people who disagree terrorists to quiet them.
Dyddy, Tit, kynesie and me, even if you don't like us, are people who also play the game, so I don't know what's your point.
Finally, I'm indeed trying to be controversial because I want to show that there's a lack of objectivity in these decisions (though it's not going to change anything). Still, I think that I have the right to have an opinion on the matter without getting considered as a dumbass, a cheater, or even worse: a cheesy guy.