why everyone said sioux lame?
why everyone said sioux lame?
i just like sioux because of Red Cloud, Sitting Bull.
and only play sioux. but in quick match game, almost people blame sioux even they win or lose the game.
wtf is this?
and only play sioux. but in quick match game, almost people blame sioux even they win or lose the game.
wtf is this?
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
its gs sindrome, ignore.
sioux are strong in some cases but total trash in others.. i wouldnt call it a lame civ.
sioux are strong in some cases but total trash in others.. i wouldnt call it a lame civ.
- edeholland
- ESOC Community Team
- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Feb 11, 2015
- ESO: edeholland
- GameRanger ID: 4053888
- Clan: ESOC
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Probably because of bow riders. They don't have a penalty against villagers which is very annoying to play against. Also they are fast (with the hero) and they got quite some hp.
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
the civ is boring, and as one demsional as you can get imo. I generally resign verus Sioux in QS I can't be bothered it's no fun to play against especially on shitty qs maps. I'd rather take the lose.
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Tekaaluk wrote:i just like sioux because of Red Cloud, Sitting Bull.
This unit is a War Chief, an explorer equivalent for the Sioux. You can give him a custom name when creating a home city on ESO.
lemmings121 wrote:its gs sindrome, ignore.
who is gs?
[spoiler=spoiler]as Koreans don't reckon, most likely[/spoiler]
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Br are just superlame on maps with almost no hunts. But after all Sioux is a trash civ.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Because Goodspeed had not yet ruined them.
Garja ex machina.
Garja ex machina.
- KINGofOsmane
- Pro Player
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Feb 24, 2015
- ESO: KINGofOsmane
- Location: Walling Town
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
umeu wrote:Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
not easy countering the great UMEU
"Losing to Callen was the worst night of my life" Gibthedurrty 2019
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
Tete cs:go experienceLecastete wrote: Dude i hate this game. I am bad and i also dont have luck
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10278
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Sioux isn't "lame" as in "OP", but as in "broken". It's really a waste of time to play against this civ, as they will basically just mass 1 unit and run on the map all the time. You winning or losing will mostly depend on how mapscrewed you are, and how long you can wait camping before you push / how hard you can wall up the map before getting hardcore bored.
Also sioux takes close to zero skill, because you don't need to macro (you don't make houses and have close to no way to boom) or to micro (you mass 1 unit anyway and can always run). It's just very low and annoying.
Also sioux takes close to zero skill, because you don't need to macro (you don't make houses and have close to no way to boom) or to micro (you mass 1 unit anyway and can always run). It's just very low and annoying.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
their cavalry are lame as FUK
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10278
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
umeu wrote:Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
Yeah so easy to beat when you have no hunts and the guy spams br, which kill more or less everything in early game
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
KINGofOsmane wrote:umeu wrote:Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
not easy countering the great UMEU
wut?! so ez man.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Kaiserklein wrote:umeu wrote:Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
Yeah so easy to beat when you have no hunts and the guy spams br, which kill more or less everything in early game
no hunt sux for sioux too. You rush them and they die.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Kaiserklein wrote:Sioux isn't "lame" as in "OP", but as in "broken". It's really a waste of time to play against this civ, as they will basically just mass 1 unit and run on the map all the time. You winning or losing will mostly depend on how mapscrewed you are, and how long you can wait camping before you push / how hard you can wall up the map before getting hardcore bored.
Also sioux takes close to zero skill, because you don't need to macro (you don't make houses and have close to no way to boom) or to micro (you mass 1 unit anyway and can always run). It's just very low and annoying.
sioux doesnt even win most mus with BR, they win most with axerider wakina lol.
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10278
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
umeu wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Sioux isn't "lame" as in "OP", but as in "broken". It's really a waste of time to play against this civ, as they will basically just mass 1 unit and run on the map all the time. You winning or losing will mostly depend on how mapscrewed you are, and how long you can wait camping before you push / how hard you can wall up the map before getting hardcore bored.
Also sioux takes close to zero skill, because you don't need to macro (you don't make houses and have close to no way to boom) or to micro (you mass 1 unit anyway and can always run). It's just very low and annoying.
sioux doesnt even win most mus with BR, they win most with axerider wakina lol.
Yeah on maps with high resources. On qs maps I don't think so, better abuse the shit hunts. It doesn't matter what you do either way, BRs are so op that most people just mass them and run of the map, which is extremely annoying and broken.
umeu wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:umeu wrote:Lol sioux is so much fun to play, not in the least because everyone goes QQ cause they have no idea how to play vs it cause they call it lame and resign instead of finding out how to counter it. which is really easy btw.
Yeah so easy to beat when you have no hunts and the guy spams br, which kill more or less everything in early game
no hunt sux for sioux too. You rush them and they die.
Maps are not balanced, you having no hunts doesn't mean sioux guy won't have hunts either. It all depends on how lucky you get, which is a reason why sioux is low and boring (ofc if you get mapscrewed vs other civs is matter too, but often not as much as vs sioux).
Btw if both sides are no food, I'm pretty sure sioux just wins because they're more mobile, they can just go camp on your hunts and idle you, and then come back defend the rush when they have a unit shipment or sth
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Suoix is very strong sometimes. Sometimes it is very weak.
High speed also removes control for the opponent.
Play what you like to play. Sioux is a fine civ to play. Opponents will always find something to be sad about.
High speed also removes control for the opponent.
Play what you like to play. Sioux is a fine civ to play. Opponents will always find something to be sad about.
- CurassierAndCurassier
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Oct 22, 2016
- ESO: Montcalm17
- Location: San Francisco
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
My experience with the Sioux:
If I lose, my opponent says something like "lol Sioux sux"
If I win: "Fuckin bs broken not fun civ"
If I lose, my opponent says something like "lol Sioux sux"
If I win: "Fuckin bs broken not fun civ"
- dicktator_
- Howdah
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Nov 14, 2015
- ESO: Conquerer999
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
People love to complain about Sioux, India, and Japan. If it's QS just flame back and offer to rematch with reverse civs. If they dodge you then you win (again).
steniothejonjoe wrote:I can micro better than 99% of the player base and that's 100% objective
- AOEisLOVE_AOEisLIFE
- Lancer
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Apr 23, 2016
- ESO: dats my secret
- Location: Ze King in Zeken's House of Zekers
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
CurassierAndCurassier wrote:My experience with the Sioux:
If I lose, my opponent says something like "lol Sioux sux"
If I win: "Fuckin bs broken not fun civ"
can almost confirm, my experience with the Sioux:
If I lose, my opponent says something like "lol you sux, fucken newb"
If I win: "Fuckin bs broken not fun civ + i am pretty sure that you are cheating, fucken newb"
- spanky4ever
- Gendarme
- Posts: 8389
- Joined: Apr 13, 2015
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
@Tekaaluk
To say its very easy to play them, is not true at all They have so bad eco compared to every other civs, that they have to be successful in raiding, or going in with a fast rush - or else they will just loose very hard.
Being successful in raiding, is NOT EASY though! So, my message to some of the ppl who have made posts here, saying they are lame, broken, easy to play!! Your just wrong, and I would suspect you dont know the sioux at all
I love playing sioux to!Tekaaluk wrote:notification
To say its very easy to play them, is not true at all They have so bad eco compared to every other civs, that they have to be successful in raiding, or going in with a fast rush - or else they will just loose very hard.
Being successful in raiding, is NOT EASY though! So, my message to some of the ppl who have made posts here, saying they are lame, broken, easy to play!! Your just wrong, and I would suspect you dont know the sioux at all
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.
-
- Gendarme
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Aug 20, 2015
- Location: USA
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
People are dumb and don't understand what lame means. Sioux not the greatest civ, why anyone would say it's lame is beyond me. Cheats are something that would be lame for example (teksumris)
A post not made is a post given away
A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay
Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay
Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
iwillspankyou wrote:@TekaalukI love playing sioux to!Tekaaluk wrote:notification
To say its very easy to play them, is not true at all They have so bad eco compared to every other civs, that they have to be successful in raiding, or going in with a fast rush - or else they will just loose very hard.
Being successful in raiding, is NOT EASY though! So, my message to some of the ppl who have made posts here, saying they are lame, broken, easy to play!! Your just wrong, and I would suspect you dont know the sioux at all
What is easier, to come anywhere from the darkness with ultra fast OP ranged cav, or to defend spread out shitty hunts with slow musk or xbow?
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 10278
- Joined: Jun 6, 2015
- Location: Paris
- GameRanger ID: 5529322
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
iwillspankyou wrote:@TekaalukI love playing sioux to!Tekaaluk wrote:notification
To say its very easy to play them, is not true at all They have so bad eco compared to every other civs, that they have to be successful in raiding, or going in with a fast rush - or else they will just loose very hard.
Being successful in raiding, is NOT EASY though! So, my message to some of the ppl who have made posts here, saying they are lame, broken, easy to play!! Your just wrong, and I would suspect you dont know the sioux at all
Sioux is like the 2nd easiest civ after otto or sth. There's close to nothing to know about them btw.
almalek wrote:it can be op in team game combined with other sterlet or other civ in 1v1 isn't so op..
It's tier 1 in team games (especially in 3v3), if not best civ, regardless of what you are combined with. In 1v1 it's not op, just lame.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: why everyone said sioux lame?
Thats such bs lol. Ppl should honestly stop pretending like training vils and making houses is the hardest shit in the world. Pretty much all aoe3 civs are about as hard macrowise. Sure sioux cant get housed. Big fucking deal lol, its super easy not to get housed. Oh and otto dont have to press t+v. Omg now its like 1 billion times easier cuz i have to do 1 thing less. Aoe3 macro is already fucking easy so to say that 1 civ is easier is quite pointless tbh. Only india has a little awkward macro but nothing u cant get used to.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests