This thread dont make much sense to me
Even though it was unfortunately that H2Os team quit after 2 games, it was clear to most of us, that they really had no chance to win,- and after one more game, they would be out
The opposite of this happened in last tournament, think it was in a semifinal or a quarterfinal, when H2O played Garja in a bo7. It was clear to all of us spectators, and Garja as well (I think) that he had no chance of winning a single game. Garja was brave enough to play all his games, though everyone could feel how painful it was, and how little he wanted to continue. I would not spank Garja if he had quit after 3 games.
Being 2 hours late for a tournament game, or reschedule in the last minute, while 200 ppl are waiting, is way more disrespectful IMO.
Instead of wanting to punish one of the best guy we ever had, both as a player and a contributor to ESOC, - and using the argument that the same rules comply to everyone? you should ask yourself; what rules is that? Or should there even be a rule like that? Should not a person be allowed to quit if finishing the games would give the same result! and that this is clear to everyone
Or do we insist of having rules that only pains the players and the spectators - in MU that are hopelessly unwinnable?? Nah - I would not want such a ruling
Hippocrits are the worst of animals. I love elifants.