gibson wrote:You're trolling right?Jerom wrote:If anything this series would show dutch needs a buff.
I hope so.
gibson wrote:You're trolling right?Jerom wrote:If anything this series would show dutch needs a buff.
Jerom wrote:Mart just played shittily in g1, he'd have won by just sieging the tc to begin with. In game 4 however, I struggle seeing that as a fair match up.
gibson wrote:Jerom wrote:Mart just played shittily in g1, he'd have won by just sieging the tc to begin with. In game 4 however, I struggle seeing that as a fair match up.
Yea cause you losing one game where you got counter picked to a better player than yourself in an mu thats always been hard for dutch on a map where brit is overall the best civ in the entire game is reason to buff dutch.
exactlyJerom wrote:gibson wrote:Jerom wrote:Mart just played shittily in g1, he'd have won by just sieging the tc to begin with. In game 4 however, I struggle seeing that as a fair match up.
Yea cause you losing one game where you got counter picked to a better player than yourself in an mu thats always been hard for dutch on a map where brit is overall the best civ in the entire game is reason to buff dutch.
Your comprehensive reading skills are subpar.
Jerom wrote:If anything this series would show dutch needs a buff.
I would make banks a bit cheaper like 250w 250f, but 4 banks, not 5. Also get something between the RE bank XP and the EP bank XP. Maybe also -100g crate start, +100w crate start. I think it would be a competitive civ, but not too good thenCouprider wrote:650 res bank is not OP. but 130*4 xp is.
i would set bank limit back to 4, while adding a 5 hussar shipment (or 1 culverin shipment) to age 3.
DaRkNiTe1698 wrote:I would make banks a bit cheaper like 250w 250f, but 4 banks, not 5. Also get something between the RE bank XP and the EP bank XP. Maybe also -100g crate start, +100w crate start. I think it would be a competitive civ, but not too good thenCouprider wrote:650 res bank is not OP. but 130*4 xp is.
i would set bank limit back to 4, while adding a 5 hussar shipment (or 1 culverin shipment) to age 3.
A Dutch player's wet dream. They'd be top civ with that change.DaRkNiTe1698 wrote:I would make banks a bit cheaper like 250w 250f,Couprider wrote:650 res bank is not OP. but 130*4 xp is.
i would set bank limit back to 4, while adding a 5 hussar shipment (or 1 culverin shipment) to age 3.
gibson wrote:250w 250f banks lul
rsy wrote:gibson wrote:250w 250f banks lul
250 250 is good yeah. don't u know how hard it is for dutch to make banks! I mean it isn't like u can have 5 banks at 6.30 on this patch. Oh wait
Jerom wrote:rsy wrote:gibson wrote:250w 250f banks lul
250 250 is good yeah. don't u know how hard it is for dutch to make banks! I mean it isn't like u can have 5 banks at 6.30 on this patch. Oh wait
If youre losing to that youre generally just playing like a sergeant.
there is nothing here that anyone who has the slightest idea about the game hasn't known for years. Yes not scouting and doing a completely wrong build should lose you the game. And Dutch, just like 10 or so other civs on EP has a weak match up vs brit.Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak. Why:
- apperantly in dutch versus china incorrectly interpreting china's build is generally a gamelosing mistake, as shown by these games. The only reason I won is because gs made mistakes afterwards and had poor decisionmaking
- dutch has at least a weak match up vs british.
DaRkNiTe1698 wrote:Maybe 300f 300w? 4 banks, not 5? The point is 5 banks is too good because they're able to get that quite early
gibson wrote:there is nothing here that anyone who has the slightest idea about the game hasn't known for years. Yes not scouting and doing a completely wrong build should lose you the game. And Dutch, just like 10 or so other civs on EP has a weak match up vs brit.Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak. Why:
- apperantly in dutch versus china incorrectly interpreting china's build is generally a gamelosing mistake, as shown by these games. The only reason I won is because gs made mistakes afterwards and had poor decisionmaking
- dutch has at least a weak match up vs british.
Jerom wrote:If anything this series would show dutch needs a buff.
CarlsbergJerom wrote:gibson wrote:there is nothing here that anyone who has the slightest idea about the game hasn't known for years. Yes not scouting and doing a completely wrong build should lose you the game. And Dutch, just like 10 or so other civs on EP has a weak match up vs brit.Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak. Why:
- apperantly in dutch versus china incorrectly interpreting china's build is generally a gamelosing mistake, as shown by these games. The only reason I won is because gs made mistakes afterwards and had poor decisionmaking
- dutch has at least a weak match up vs british.Jerom wrote:If anything this series would show dutch needs a buff.
In other words, to me this series shows little about balance except that dutch can struggle against brits. Like I said, your comprehensive reading skills could use some work.
Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak.
rsy wrote:Jerom wrote:rsy wrote:250 250 is good yeah. don't u know how hard it is for dutch to make banks! I mean it isn't like u can have 5 banks at 6.30 on this patch. Oh wait
If youre losing to that youre generally just playing like a sergeant.
I was actually playing blackstar. Guess it is like playing serg vs captain.
Either way, a bank pays off for itself in 4 mins. U had a good chance vs goodspeed in that last game if u didn't send out all your hussars out to raid and proceed to lose them all twice over. Even 1 lts these days don't do such shit ass raids
I imagine having 14 hussars in the final fights would've helped u against those lbs way more than killing 3 vills. Oh and also not losing all ur artillery the way u did.
Edit: if anything, this series shows how much better gs is than u
gh0st wrote:Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak.
Well , you do realize that gs is a better much better player than you, right? & once you consider that this series doesn't proof shit.
pecelot wrote:gh0st wrote:Jerom wrote:If anything this series shoes that dutch is weak.
Well , you do realize that gs is a better much better player than you, right? & once you consider that this series doesn't proof shit.
If that would be the case, Jerom couldn't take one game from GS, right? I'd just be more careful when judging players' skills on one series — would you say H2O is much better than LordRaphael — and vice versa!?
pecelot wrote: Jerom proved in the last tournament he's a very good player, I'm not sure why you all bring that up. Some people wanted to draw conclusions, and he just replied that those are very limited.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?