perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
it worked on agecom pretty well. it would help make this forum tidier, and more of a one stop shop for folks that play multiple game modes, and would def bump site traffic if youre into that, as there really isnt any other forum out there ATM with dedicated sections to specific game modes.
pls bb pls
pls bb pls
VIRTZN and CM1993 are my friends and they never cheat. everyone should add them. kappa
- musketeer925
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Mar 28, 2015
- ESO: musketeer925
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
I don't know that a deathmatch forum is worth the screen space, does anyone really play it?
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
like 3 people?musketeer925 wrote:I don''t know that a deathmatch forum is worth the screen space, does anyone really play it?
Dm is definitely not worth the space.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
I play deathmatch, its extremely fun imho.
But i must agree not enough people play it for it to be worthwhile.
But i must agree not enough people play it for it to be worthwhile.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
If it leads to more epic flame wars like an the old forum that would be great. Unfortunately it seems that almost all the old tr players are gone so I doubt that would happen. I can't remember a single thread here that pertained to dm or even tr so I see no reason to have serene sections imo
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
Are there even people left seriously playing treaty?
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
I'm pretty sure Dick is the only good tr player still playing.....
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
i play both treaty and deathmatch!
i've considered making something like a treaty megathread here, but decided against it. a treaty section would be nice. there is a lot of metagaming involved in treaty matchups! we still haven't fully explored tr20/deathmatch. i remember in goodspeed's guide him saying that there was so much unexplored territory in aoe3. giving a place of discussion for the smaller gamemodes would be really great imo.
i've considered making something like a treaty megathread here, but decided against it. a treaty section would be nice. there is a lot of metagaming involved in treaty matchups! we still haven't fully explored tr20/deathmatch. i remember in goodspeed's guide him saying that there was so much unexplored territory in aoe3. giving a place of discussion for the smaller gamemodes would be really great imo.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
write a tr20 guide plz. I still have your notes :lemon:cometk wrote:i play both treaty and deathmatch!
i''ve considered making something like a treaty megathread here, but decided against it. a treaty section would be nice. there is a lot of metagaming involved in treaty matchups! we still haven''t fully explored tr20/deathmatch. i remember in goodspeed''s guide him saying that there was so much unexplored territory in aoe3. giving a place of discussion for the smaller gamemodes would be really great imo.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
good idea ~
even if we're all mostly supremacy players it's not like we can't add a treaty section. treaty players are humans too, after all
i'm up for it, but when we add it we need to make sure that it doesn't interfere with site layout too much & stuff
but i'm interested
even if we're all mostly supremacy players it's not like we can't add a treaty section. treaty players are humans too, after all
i'm up for it, but when we add it we need to make sure that it doesn't interfere with site layout too much & stuff
but i'm interested
-
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3680
- Joined: Feb 21, 2015
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
"treaty players are humans too, after all" - Incog 2015
-
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mar 28, 2015
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
Serious?y i wouldn t add an extra section for treaty and dm because those sections are likely to not be used.. of there is a general and a strategy section and i think its perfect this way.. way to less people to post/discuss and write in three sections
- musketeer925
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Mar 28, 2015
- ESO: musketeer925
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
I think it doesn''t hurt to try it and see if it gets used. If not, then it can be removed again.mamapapaisop wrote:Serious?y i wouldn t add an extra section for treaty and dm because those sections are likely to not be used.. of there is a general and a strategy section and i think its perfect this way.. way to less people to post/discuss and write in three sections
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
We talked it over a bit.. Though not everyone has responded yet, the way we currently see it is the following:
There isn't really a supremacy section on ESOC either. There isn't really any particular section for any particular game mode and this is to keep things simple. We'd rather not have 10 different forum sections, so we grouped everything together. Any thread discussing treaty strategy can be posted in the "AoE3 Strategy" section along with everything else. You'll notice a lack of "tech support" forums and "other games" forums as well.
If treaty guides are posted, I'm more than willing to add a treaty section to the Strategy wall we have. Same goes for DM. If you're a treaty player and you want to discuss treaty, by all means do so here.
Obviously, please continue discussing this in the thread so we can pretty gauge how everyone feels about it. This is where we currently stand. ~
There isn't really a supremacy section on ESOC either. There isn't really any particular section for any particular game mode and this is to keep things simple. We'd rather not have 10 different forum sections, so we grouped everything together. Any thread discussing treaty strategy can be posted in the "AoE3 Strategy" section along with everything else. You'll notice a lack of "tech support" forums and "other games" forums as well.
If treaty guides are posted, I'm more than willing to add a treaty section to the Strategy wall we have. Same goes for DM. If you're a treaty player and you want to discuss treaty, by all means do so here.
Obviously, please continue discussing this in the thread so we can pretty gauge how everyone feels about it. This is where we currently stand. ~
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
More people = more fun. So if a treaty section makes more people join us, then give us a treaty section.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
I 100% understand that point of view
The thing is, treaty players are already able to post their treaty threads here.
It may not be formalized however it's there.
I'd encourage treaty players to start opening them. I will be here to maintain justice if need be
The thing is, treaty players are already able to post their treaty threads here.
It may not be formalized however it's there.
I'd encourage treaty players to start opening them. I will be here to maintain justice if need be
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
It would probably become an unclear mess then. I remember that from Agecomm, where you always had to wonder if the topic was regarding treaty of sup. And that was with a treaty section.incog wrote:I 100% understand that point of view
The thing is, treaty players are already able to post their treaty threads here.
It may not be formalized however it''s there.
I''d encourage treaty players to start opening them. I will be here to maintain justice if need be
- edeholland
- ESOC Community Team
- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Feb 11, 2015
- ESO: edeholland
- GameRanger ID: 4053888
- Clan: ESOC
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
You can always put [Treaty] or [Question] or [Deathmatch] in front of you thread so everybody knows what it is about.
- musketeer925
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Mar 28, 2015
- ESO: musketeer925
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
Indeed, every question about anything people posted had a first response "is this for sup or tr" at AgeComm before the sections. Then again, the same kind of noobs who wouldn't clarify are all the same ones as those who would not post in the right section anyway.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
lol truemusketeer925 wrote:Indeed, every question about anything people posted had a first response "is this for sup or tr" at AgeComm before the sections. Then again, the same kind of noobs who wouldn''t clarify are all the same ones as those who would not post in the right section anyway.
perhaps add a section for DM & TR?
gibson wrote:If it leads to more epic flame wars like an the old forum that would be great. Unfortunately it seems that almost all the old tr players are gone so I doubt that would happen. I can''t remember a single thread here that pertained to dm or even tr so I see no reason to have serene sections imo
The mill collision thread was relevant for tr. (7 vill vs 10 vill)
Aiz played DM on stream yesterday :happytomato:
Check out my Custom Map Workshop here!
http://eso-community.net/viewtopic.php?p=98718#top
http://eso-community.net/viewtopic.php?p=98718#top
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests