Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Would help eliminate some confusion and allow treaty players to come together a bit more easily on this sup-dominated site. Could also allow for some cool treaty strategy boards etc.
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Yes it should have its own section. It's a different ball game to "rush".
Save confusion, help treat players, new members to the site.
Different decks, maps, strategies are used. So no reason to not have a seperate area.
Save confusion, help treat players, new members to the site.
Different decks, maps, strategies are used. So no reason to not have a seperate area.
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Does clutter the forums on the other hand (theres too many sections to start with). I think Im overall kinda indifferent.
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Imo A new sub forum would be good.
@fightinfrenchman
But also, tr threads can just be tagged the title..
@fightinfrenchman
, people are not excluding tr players by doing this, you have to agree that tr comments are totally offtopic in a 'rush' thread. The same way someone talking about a jan abus timing at 7mins in the middle of a tr discussion would be totally irrelevant...fightinfrenchman wrote:notification
But also, tr threads can just be tagged the title..
- thebritish
- Jaeger
- Posts: 3787
- Joined: Jul 18, 2015
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
treaty discussion subforum is a good idea.
krichk wrote: For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge thebritish
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Jerom wrote:Does clutter the forums on the other hand (theres too many sections to start with). I think Im overall kinda indifferent.
Well there should be some kind of organisation. They are completely different ways of playing with wildly different metas, they need soem way of differentiating them.
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame
- _NiceKING_
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: Sep 16, 2015
- ESO: _NiceKING_
- GameRanger ID: 9999999
- Clan: Xbox
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Yeah, treaty subforum would be great.
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Lol the elitism on this forum
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
-
- Gendarme
- Posts: 5788
- Joined: Aug 20, 2015
- Location: USA
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
britishmusketeer wrote:tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame
Actually (if we were to check) the IQ scores of treaty players tend to be much higher (in the 130-140 range) than those of rush folks. I'm not surprised so many people prefer the instant action that is rush since most people don't have IQ scores that high!
A post not made is a post given away
A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay
Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
A slushie a day keeps the refill thread at bay
Jackson Pollock was the best poster to ever to post on these forums
- _NiceKING_
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: Sep 16, 2015
- ESO: _NiceKING_
- GameRanger ID: 9999999
- Clan: Xbox
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Why hasn't there been one created yet??????? Vamos chicas
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
evilcheadar wrote:britishmusketeer wrote:tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame
Actually (if we were to check) the IQ scores of treaty players tend to be much higher (in the 130-140 range) than those of rush folks. I'm not surprised so many people prefer the instant action that is rush since most people don't have IQ scores that high!
cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
britishmusketeer wrote:cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt
nice try, scrub
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Cometk wrote:britishmusketeer wrote:cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt
nice try, scrub
gg I guess
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
No , treaty players know the basics of supremacy and beeing this site called " eso community " treaty players are a part of this com either u like it or not . If there are ppl who don't know much about surpremacy then explain them your pov, If u want to diferenciate the topic do so on the title .
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
Yeah, then the basement boys wouldnt get confused.
Error 404: Signature not found
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
fightinfrenchman wrote:Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.
lol yea our main purpose is to destroy the treaty community at any cost coz we so good at rushing with Iro!!!!!!
and this guy says everywhere that he deserves to be a mod xD
IMO it should be divided, treaty advice then would be found much more easily.
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
I don't think treaty and supremacy should be separated with specific sections, both can just co-exist in peace tbh
add [TR] to treaty topics if you really want sup scrubs to stay out! x)
add [TR] to treaty topics if you really want sup scrubs to stay out! x)
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
So we would need someone to edit the names of already existing TR topics.
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
pecelot wrote:fightinfrenchman wrote:Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.
lol yea our main purpose is to destroy the treaty community at any cost coz we so good at rushing with Iro!!!!!!
and this guy says everywhere that he deserves to be a mod xD
IMO it should be divided, treaty advice then would be found much more easily.
Why are you so mad at me?
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
just don't like your attitude towards being a mod, and IMO you are too eccentric, but it's not the main point, I was reffering to a dumb post of yours, where you create a thing called „rush elitist"
- fightinfrenchman
- Ninja
- Posts: 23506
- Joined: Oct 17, 2015
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
pecelot wrote:just don't like your attitude towards being a mod, and IMO you are too eccentric, but it's not the main point, I was reffering to a dumb post of yours, where you create a thing called „rush elitist"
I don't understand why you're so mad at me sir.
Dromedary Scone Mix is not Alone Mix
Re: Separate treaty discussion/strategy section
I'm not mad at you to begin with, but even then if you don't understand it, then well...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests