Separate treaty discussion/strategy section

[forgrin]

Would help eliminate some confusion and allow treaty players to come together a bit more easily on this sup-dominated site. Could also allow for some cool treaty strategy boards etc.

[fightinfrenchman]

Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.

[v1pus]

Yes it should have its own section. It's a different ball game to "rush".

Save confusion, help treat players, new members to the site.

Different decks, maps, strategies are used. So no reason to not have a seperate area.

[momuuu]

Does clutter the forums on the other hand (theres too many sections to start with). I think Im overall kinda indifferent.

[lemmings121]

Imo A new sub forum would be good.
@fightinfrenchman

notification

, people are not excluding tr players by doing this, you have to agree that tr comments are totally offtopic in a 'rush' thread. The same way someone talking about a jan abus timing at 7mins in the middle of a tr discussion would be totally irrelevant...


But also, tr threads can just be tagged the title..

[thebritish]

treaty discussion subforum is a good idea.

[forgrin]

Does clutter the forums on the other hand (theres too many sections to start with). I think Im overall kinda indifferent.

Well there should be some kind of organisation. They are completely different ways of playing with wildly different metas, they need soem way of differentiating them.

[britishmusketeer]

tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame

[_NiceKING_]

Yeah, treaty subforum would be great.

[fightinfrenchman]

Lol the elitism on this forum

[evilcheadar]

tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame

Actually (if we were to check) the IQ scores of treaty players tend to be much higher (in the 130-140 range) than those of rush folks. I'm not surprised so many people prefer the instant action that is rush since most people don't have IQ scores that high!

[_NiceKING_]

[v1pus]

Why hasn't there been one created yet??????? Vamos chicas

[britishmusketeer]

tbf if people want to talk about treaty they should just put it in the title. I mean 95% of people don't want to wait 40 min to play a simplified version of the game. #treatyflame

Actually (if we were to check) the IQ scores of treaty players tend to be much higher (in the 130-140 range) than those of rush folks. I'm not surprised so many people prefer the instant action that is rush since most people don't have IQ scores that high!

cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt

[Cometk]

cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt

nice try, scrub

[britishmusketeer]

cool. Lets do an iq test and post print the results. Here's mine: http://imgur.com/szhxwJt

nice try, scrub

gg I guess

[sergyou]

No , treaty players know the basics of supremacy and beeing this site called " eso community " treaty players are a part of this com either u like it or not . If there are ppl who don't know much about surpremacy then explain them your pov, If u want to diferenciate the topic do so on the title .

[noissance]

Yeah, then the basement boys wouldnt get confused.

[pecelot]

Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.

lol yea our main purpose is to destroy the treaty community at any cost coz we so good at rushing with Iro!!!!!!
and this guy says everywhere that he deserves to be a mod xD
IMO it should be divided, treaty advice then would be found much more easily.

[iNcog]

I don't think treaty and supremacy should be separated with specific sections, both can just co-exist in peace tbh

add [TR] to treaty topics if you really want sup scrubs to stay out! x)

[pecelot]

So we would need someone to edit the names of already existing TR topics.

[fightinfrenchman]

Lol no... Treaty shouldn't be sectioned off because rush elitists want to.

lol yea our main purpose is to destroy the treaty community at any cost coz we so good at rushing with Iro!!!!!!
and this guy says everywhere that he deserves to be a mod xD
IMO it should be divided, treaty advice then would be found much more easily.

Why are you so mad at me?

[pecelot]

just don't like your attitude towards being a mod, and IMO you are too eccentric, but it's not the main point, I was reffering to a dumb post of yours, where you create a thing called „rush elitist"

[fightinfrenchman]

just don't like your attitude towards being a mod, and IMO you are too eccentric, but it's not the main point, I was reffering to a dumb post of yours, where you create a thing called „rush elitist"

I don't understand why you're so mad at me sir.

[pecelot]

I'm not mad at you to begin with, but even then if you don't understand it, then well...