Anti aztec stuff
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Anti aztec stuff
i have no interest in playing with you.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Why? :O
You always want to get a spot to obs my games.
You always want to get a spot to obs my games.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Anti aztec stuff
i cant recall that i asked to obs you, just hazza. i didnt know he was playing you, or i wouldnt have asked. i cant care less about you.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Anyway, back to the topic, China is probably one of the worst civ against aztecs, so if you're good at defending take brits, else Otto ff (Jan/falc/mam is super scary), Jan/Huss or India 10/10 are hard to beat, especially at captain level.
If you want more details, feel free to pm me on discord, eso or twitch
If you want more details, feel free to pm me on discord, eso or twitch
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Anti aztec stuff
how would china lose to aztec?
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Mace wrote:Anyway, back to the topic, China is probably one of the worst civ against aztecs, so if you're good at defending take brits, else Otto ff (Jan/falc/mam is super scary), Jan/Huss or India 10/10 are hard to beat, especially at captain level.
If you want more details, feel free to pm me on discord, eso or twitch
just send boxer rebellion and go afk
Re: Anti aztec stuff
umeu wrote:how would china lose to aztec?
They can't survive to a timing, unless it's Siberia but I think they would still lose there.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Anti aztec stuff
what timing? 6m 7m 8m 10m? also which and how many units
Re: Anti aztec stuff
umeu wrote:what timing? 6m 7m 8m 10m? also which and how many units
700w/5v/10/9 but honestly they lose to anything.
700/3/5/10/9 also works you can also all in.
Usually I go full coyotes but full pikes also works.
Actually the only way you survive as China is with some colonial play, but you die eventually.
I've also tried it as China and I just lost too
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Hazza54321 wrote:Spain also rapes azzy
Puma rush>spain ff from my experience
somppukunkku wrote:This is not a fucking discogame.
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Mace wrote:Ports used to do fine on the previous patch but now they lose.
Oh yeah, the 5 food nerf is absolutelly HUGE.
last patch? just fine! EZ GAME EZ LIFE, 100% winrate on that MU. but now? with FIVE FOOD less? Impossible MU, totally broken. Even with the WC nerf on this patch, 5 food is just too big. Those patch guys have no idea what they do right?
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mar 1, 2015
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Mace wrote:umeu wrote:how would china lose to aztec?
They can't survive to a timing, unless it's Siberia but I think they would still lose there.
Are you maceanator?
Dead hunts cant walk....
BrookG - "There is a G in everyone"
BrookG - "There is a G in everyone"
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: Anti aztec stuff
lemmings121 wrote:Mace wrote:Ports used to do fine on the previous patch but now they lose.
Oh yeah, the 5 food nerf is absolutelly HUGE.
last patch? just fine! EZ GAME EZ LIFE, 100% winrate on that MU. but now? with FIVE FOOD less? Impossible MU, totally broken. Even with the WC nerf on this patch, 5 food is just too big. Those patch guys have no idea what they do right?
well it was the same thing with russia :p
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Darwin_ wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:Spain also rapes azzy
Puma rush>spain ff from my experience
Well, it's close but if you wall your tower, send CM and train some dogs timed with the minutemen, you hold.
And then you win :)
Re: Anti aztec stuff
lemmings121 wrote:Mace wrote:Ports used to do fine on the previous patch but now they lose.
Oh yeah, the 5 food nerf is absolutelly HUGE.
last patch? just fine! EZ GAME EZ LIFE, 100% winrate on that MU. but now? with FIVE FOOD less? Impossible MU, totally broken. Even with the WC nerf on this patch, 5 food is just too big. Those patch guys have no idea what they do right?
Eh, no need to be offensive.
I was against that 5f nerf, eventhough it's okay, but trust me, it's big.
Russia was very strong last patch thanks to a -5f buff, how do you explain that?
Don't misunderstand me though, I'm not saying that 5f makes a HUGE difference, but it does make one, which explains that port would win the match-up in the last version of the patch, but now they lose it, eventhough it's close.
You also have to keep in mind that it wasn't just a 20f discount, but a food discount combined with a -100f nerf, which is actually like a 10f discount at the end.
Thus, we can say that Ports are between their RE level and their last patch level, which I'm sure you agree is something :)
I don't understand your agressivity, but the guy(s) who made the last patch exactly knows what he does :)
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Victor_swe wrote:Mace wrote:umeu wrote:how would china lose to aztec?
They can't survive to a timing, unless it's Siberia but I think they would still lose there.
Are you maceanator?
No, just an aztec fan :)
- P i k i l i c
- Howdah
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Nov 17, 2015
- ESO: Pikilic
- Location: Dijon, France
- GameRanger ID: 7497456
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Will your next nick be Puma?
-
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Jul 29, 2015
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Anti aztec stuff
P i k i l i c wrote:Will your next nick be Puma?
Probably, Aztec seems to be the trend for him currently.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Re: Anti aztec stuff
@diar.. @Mace
you are the one who does the definitive and absolute statements here.
when you say "before port would win just fine, now they just lose." its not like you are saying "its 51-49..", but you say it like it was just an easy matchup and now its hopeless for ports.
Then I add the fact that aztec just got nerfed, and the diference (to last patch, re is not beeing discussed) is just 5f, and is plain obvious that you are making exagerated statements.
I'm not saying that 5f doesnt matter, i'm saying that it wont change a mu from easy to impossible, when the enemy civ just got nerfed as well.
you are the one who does the definitive and absolute statements here.
when you say "before port would win just fine, now they just lose." its not like you are saying "its 51-49..", but you say it like it was just an easy matchup and now its hopeless for ports.
Then I add the fact that aztec just got nerfed, and the diference (to last patch, re is not beeing discussed) is just 5f, and is plain obvious that you are making exagerated statements.
I'm not saying that 5f doesnt matter, i'm saying that it wont change a mu from easy to impossible, when the enemy civ just got nerfed as well.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Mace wrote:Darwin_ wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:Spain also rapes azzy
Puma rush>spain ff from my experience
Well, it's close but if you wall your tower, send CM and train some dogs timed with the minutemen, you hold.
And then you win :)
Yeah its just something I've trolled with a few times and no one expected it so it worked
somppukunkku wrote:This is not a fucking discogame.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
P i k i l i c wrote:Will your next nick be Puma?
I considered it and I'll call it eagle runner actually.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
lemmings121 wrote:@diar.. @Mace
you are the one who does the definitive and absolute statements here.
when you say "before port would win just fine, now they just lose." its not like you are saying "its 51-49..", but you say it like it was just an easy matchup and now its hopeless for ports.
Then I add the fact that aztec just got nerfed, and the diference (to last patch, re is not beeing discussed) is just 5f, and is plain obvious that you are making exagerated statements.
I'm not saying that 5f doesnt matter, i'm saying that it wont change a mu from easy to impossible, when the enemy civ just got nerfed as well.
Aztec wasn't nerfed actually.
The removal of cover mode is only an issue when you want to go FI, when playing colonial it's almost irrelevant.
My statement was exagerated that's true, but you don't need to make such a post to answer.
Something like "you're exagerating the consequences of a 5f nerf" would be just fine
Let me rephrase my previous statement:
Last patch it would be 55-45 in port's favour, now it's the contrary because 5f/vill is big (in fact, it was an overbuff for Russia).
-
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Jul 29, 2015
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Mace wrote:P i k i l i c wrote:Will your next nick be Puma?
I considered it and I'll call it eagle runner actually.
You should get all the War Hut units out of the way first... then proceed to Noble's Hut.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Re: Anti aztec stuff
][quote="Mace wrote:Darwin_ wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:Spain also rapes azzy
Puma rush>spain ff from my experience
Well, it's close but if you wall your tower, send CM and train some dogs timed with the minutemen, you hold.
And then you win :)
Yeah its just something I've trolled with a few times and no one expected it so it worked [/quote]
It's not troll, it's very viable and maybe even the best option for Spain.
It means that a rush will just fail.
A timing won't break the Spain fortress timing and eco plays from azzy ie ff or late colo play can't deal with the falc timing.
If he's not rushing don't send cm ofc.
-
- Lancer
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mar 1, 2015
Re: Anti aztec stuff
Arrow Knight BB ezpz
Dead hunts cant walk....
BrookG - "There is a G in everyone"
BrookG - "There is a G in everyone"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests