ESOCommunity

Nice idea, I am sure it will be helpful for many players, thanks. Now you can write French the right way and it will be perfect

P i k i l i c wrote:Now you can write French the right way and it will be perfect

Oh shit. Thx

This entire mu of the week is really well done and enjoyable, nice work :)

noice. less work for me, I definitely appreciate that. I am tired

Going to sticky this since it's going to be as useful as the strategy wall. Keep up the good work @j_t_kirk !

Wow, absolutely phenomenal content. Thanks @j_t_kirk .

was really hoping this thread had something to do with pool chemicals, disappointed again.

Thanks for great work. Nice to have all the match ups for each civilisation in one place.

As an aside, under the Ottoman match ups the link spells Aztec wrong.

It would be cool if we could do 2v2 matchups as well!

Not really, because there is no 2v2 theory.

Darwin_ wrote:It would be cool if we could do 2v2 matchups as well!

We probably will be all dead before you make a tuto for all 2v2 MUs on all maps

We could do something for 2v2 like reviewing civ combinations tho, and only bother with common ones. Something like "Russia + China does this well but struggles vs double cav so avoid MUs with French+German" etc etc. Would be much less intensive than reviewing MUs individually.

It wouldn't be possible because there is no 2v2 theory, since team games depend too much on the MUs/maps/play styles, and I'm sure we'd have 10 different opinions about how "Russia+China" does and it would just be irrelevant.

[Armag] diarouga wrote:It wouldn't be possible because there is no 2v2 theory, since team games depend too much on the MUs/maps/play styles, and I'm sure we'd have 10 different opinions about how "Russia+China" does and it would just be irrelevant.

did you make the 1v1 thread for this week? if you need some help send me the template so i can help posting..

lemmings121 wrote:

[Armag] diarouga wrote:It wouldn't be possible because there is no 2v2 theory, since team games depend too much on the MUs/maps/play styles, and I'm sure we'd have 10 different opinions about how "Russia+China" does and it would just be irrelevant.

did you make the 1v1 thread for this week? if you need some help send me the template so i can help posting..

Well you can take the thing I guess
I'm not really motivated into doing more MU of the week because, eventhough it takes me less than 1min to make a thread, the 2 or 3 last MUs haven't been discussed at all.

I am new to the game and I don't know what mu means can someone explain pls

@Pasos MU stands for "matchup". It refers to how a specific pair of civilizations plays against each other. Like in the Ottoman vs British matchup, the Ottoman player is most likely to win.

Cometk wrote:Like in the Ottoman vs British matchup, the Ottoman player is most likely to win.

No?

[Armag] diarouga wrote:

Cometk wrote:Like in the Ottoman vs British matchup, the Ottoman player is most likely to win.

No?

another example: the british win this matchup if you’re diarouga

Cometk wrote:

[Armag] diarouga wrote:

Cometk wrote:Like in the Ottoman vs British matchup, the Ottoman player is most likely to win.

No?

another example: the british win this matchup if you’re diarouga

I think @thebritish wins all MUs.

@j_t_kirk I suggest Iro vs Sioux

Second to that

I want to suggest India vs Iroquois cuz iirc there was some debate between somppu and diarouga on whether iro is a good counter to ind or not and i think we never reached a conclusion. Plus its a cool mu that we don't see too often