Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
What do you guys think?
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Sepoy advantages[/u]:
1) Very tanky
2) High base damage
3) Good vs any ranged infantry, including enemy musketeers and skirms/bows
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Sepoy disadvantages[/u]:
1) Slow (compared to zamburak)
2) Makes you more food-dependent
3) Not as good vs cav
[span style="font-weight:bold'"]-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zamburak advantages[/span]:
1) Very fast
2) Two upgrade cards in colonial
3) Do about as much damage to cavalry in raged attack as sepoy do in melee attack
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Zamburak disadvantages[/u]:
1) Need a stable
2) Low hp
3) Bad vs ranged infantry
I've seen some players make sepoy, others only zamburaks. But if sepoy are better, I don't understand why all civs don't just make vet musk in age 3. You might say that making musk is viable only for India because sepoy are really strong compared to average musks, but British musks are strong too and British makes goons in age 3.
If it's typical skirm goon vs skirm musk, skirm musk should win because musk>'goons. However, once there's cav involved, the goon army becomes better because goons do as much damage in ranged mode as musks do in melee mode.
It sounds like I'm really in favor of zamburak, but after I saw Blackstar play india with sepoy I'm leaning towards the sepoy, I guess what you loose vs cav you make up for by having a better time against ranged infantry, but then I can't rationalize why nobody makes vet musks with for example with French unless you're just afraid of cannons.
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Sepoy advantages[/u]:
1) Very tanky
2) High base damage
3) Good vs any ranged infantry, including enemy musketeers and skirms/bows
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Sepoy disadvantages[/u]:
1) Slow (compared to zamburak)
2) Makes you more food-dependent
3) Not as good vs cav
[span style="font-weight:bold'"]-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zamburak advantages[/span]:
1) Very fast
2) Two upgrade cards in colonial
3) Do about as much damage to cavalry in raged attack as sepoy do in melee attack
[u style="font-weight:bold'"]Zamburak disadvantages[/u]:
1) Need a stable
2) Low hp
3) Bad vs ranged infantry
I've seen some players make sepoy, others only zamburaks. But if sepoy are better, I don't understand why all civs don't just make vet musk in age 3. You might say that making musk is viable only for India because sepoy are really strong compared to average musks, but British musks are strong too and British makes goons in age 3.
If it's typical skirm goon vs skirm musk, skirm musk should win because musk>'goons. However, once there's cav involved, the goon army becomes better because goons do as much damage in ranged mode as musks do in melee mode.
It sounds like I'm really in favor of zamburak, but after I saw Blackstar play india with sepoy I'm leaning towards the sepoy, I guess what you loose vs cav you make up for by having a better time against ranged infantry, but then I can't rationalize why nobody makes vet musks with for example with French unless you're just afraid of cannons.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Sepoy are very good stats for cost musks, zams are mediocre ranged cav. Obviously though, goons in colonial are great.
The units are viable in different situations but I would usually prefer sepoy. Their only downside is that they have to go in front to do anything and they die quickly to ranged fire. This also means they get much stronger in fortress, they have high damage output and India has a great meatshield of mahout+urumi in fortress, protecting sepoy from ranged fire.
Only time I would prefer zams is in prolonged colonial when the camel cards become a factor.
The units are viable in different situations but I would usually prefer sepoy. Their only downside is that they have to go in front to do anything and they die quickly to ranged fire. This also means they get much stronger in fortress, they have high damage output and India has a great meatshield of mahout+urumi in fortress, protecting sepoy from ranged fire.
Only time I would prefer zams is in prolonged colonial when the camel cards become a factor.
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
But even in long colonial when you''re fighting vs mostly like lb musk, don''t you think sepoy are better as long as there''s not a lot of cav? Whenever I play long term vs British on high hunt map, my ghurka/zamb mass always gets destroyed by lb, but in these finals blackstar did really good with sepoy vs British.calmyourtits wrote:Sepoy are very good stats for cost musks, zams are mediocre ranged cav. Obviously though, goons in colonial are great.
The units are viable in different situations but I would usually prefer sepoy. Their only downside is that they have to go in front to do anything and they die quickly to ranged fire. This also means they get much stronger in fortress, they have high damage output and India has a great meatshield of mahout+urumi in fortress, protecting sepoy from ranged fire.
Only time I would prefer zams is in prolonged colonial when the camel cards become a factor.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Mostly lb musk? You shouldn't be making a single sepoy or zam.. Just gurkha sowar will do.
Careful you don't draw the wrong conclusions looking at a couple of games. It's not composition that won BS these India/Brit games
Careful you don't draw the wrong conclusions looking at a couple of games. It's not composition that won BS these India/Brit games
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
The pure inf choice seemed more forced due to pressure and the map than a real free strategical decision. I dont think it was his plan ever when he started. 3-4 unit combo with raid ability will beat 2.
But i guess if ryan had gone in that the 150 mark (thats ariound 12 min or so u think) he was ahead with like double units. A fight forced near agra or into eco there i think wouldve given him the leas commandingly. He had army lead for a significant time but only sat on it.
Personally im a fan of sepoy, i guess mainly cuz im a fan of india semi and since u want gurkha and agra age to colo, zambs are just awkward to mix in
But i guess if ryan had gone in that the 150 mark (thats ariound 12 min or so u think) he was ahead with like double units. A fight forced near agra or into eco there i think wouldve given him the leas commandingly. He had army lead for a significant time but only sat on it.
Personally im a fan of sepoy, i guess mainly cuz im a fan of india semi and since u want gurkha and agra age to colo, zambs are just awkward to mix in
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Well it''s not just that, h2o usually goes zamb, but recently I heard him comment that sepoy are really good vs British I think or something like that,and before that I obsed him play brit vs a major india and he was surprised at how hard it was for him to crack the ghurka sepoy.calmyourtits wrote:Mostly lb musk? You shouldn''t be making a single sepoy or zam.. Just gurkha sowar will do.
Careful you don''t draw the wrong conclusions looking at a couple of games. It''s not composition that won BS these India/Brit games
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Well goons dont reallly compare to zambs that well. Goons are simply alot stronger. And alot of civs do go for age3 musketeers, think of japan ashi yumi, besides india sepoy urumi mahout ghurka there is also otto jan cannon abus mams and both french and brits go for vet musk cannon from time to time. Imo cuir musk cannon with 15 skir for example is the best way for fre to crack ports.
Advantages of goons over zams are though that they obv are more resillient, have shadowtech and are stronger at raiding. Also you get 10 pop at a time instead of 5 even though zambs train a bit faster. On top of that i find it awkward to mix in a stable when india semi because you also need a rax to upgrade ghurkas since you cant on agra. This is 400w and you cant really afford that wood or can you both facilities anyway. On top of that what makes zambs better than sepoy is the mobility vs raids, but they need the 2 cav cards to send them over the top, and you can only afford to send those in colonial. So it makes sens that you make them more often in age2 and usually if india can go and survive late colonial they win anyway
Advantages of goons over zams are though that they obv are more resillient, have shadowtech and are stronger at raiding. Also you get 10 pop at a time instead of 5 even though zambs train a bit faster. On top of that i find it awkward to mix in a stable when india semi because you also need a rax to upgrade ghurkas since you cant on agra. This is 400w and you cant really afford that wood or can you both facilities anyway. On top of that what makes zambs better than sepoy is the mobility vs raids, but they need the 2 cav cards to send them over the top, and you can only afford to send those in colonial. So it makes sens that you make them more often in age2 and usually if india can go and survive late colonial they win anyway
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
You sure about that?calmyourtits wrote:Mostly lb musk? You shouldn''t be making a single sepoy or zam.. Just gurkha sowar will do.
Careful you don''t draw the wrong conclusions looking at a couple of games. It''s not composition that won BS these India/Brit games
thinking about the first game, what would bsop do with only gurka sowar against that mass of hus? :S
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
You don't make gurkha sowar against a mass of huss...
Mostly lb musk?
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Sepoy vs Zamburak?
well, true.
missread that.
But even against pure musk lb I would be afraid of having zero anticav
brits usualy can pop 5~10 suprise huss outa nowhere.. imo that composition of the second game is better them pure gurka... have mostly gurka, but some sepoy, just in case...
missread that.
But even against pure musk lb I would be afraid of having zero anticav
brits usualy can pop 5~10 suprise huss outa nowhere.. imo that composition of the second game is better them pure gurka... have mostly gurka, but some sepoy, just in case...
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
I would like to revive this topic, since i have trouble countering british with india. They make so many hussars and goons instead of muskets (because of gurkah?) In this case, would zamburaks (without card) be better or...?
Error 404: Signature not found
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Zamburaks are very good with 1 or 2 upgrades. You should not be afraid to make them, nor should you blindly follow the common "sepoy are OP" belief—because they're not.
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Zamburak are better when you play defensively. With zam/gurkha combo you can kite a lot, kill mass units while you don't lose too much. But sepoy are obviously better in aggro plays.
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Aren't Sowars important vs brits? I always make them. Though not exclusively ofcourse.
A) against longbows
B) raiding (brit usually has vils all over the map building houses/gathering food)
Brit also stays in colonial long so the 2 camel cards become viable.
A) against longbows
B) raiding (brit usually has vils all over the map building houses/gathering food)
Brit also stays in colonial long so the 2 camel cards become viable.
To see a world in a grain of saind, A heaven in a wild flower
Hold infinity in the palm of you hand, And eternity in an hour
- William Blake, Auguries of Innocence
Hold infinity in the palm of you hand, And eternity in an hour
- William Blake, Auguries of Innocence
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Mitoe wrote:Zamburaks are very good with 1 or 2 upgrades. You should not be afraid to make them, nor should you blindly follow the common "sepoy are OP" belief—because they're not.
If sepoys arent op, then why did you lose to sumppuuu
- princeofkabul
- Pro Player
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
- ESO: Princeofkabul
- Location: In retirement home with Sam and Vic
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
umeu wrote:Mitoe wrote:Zamburaks are very good with 1 or 2 upgrades. You should not be afraid to make them, nor should you blindly follow the common "sepoy are OP" belief—because they're not.
If sepoys arent op, then why did you lose to sumppuuu
Probably got outplayed by somppus' magnificent micro and mechanical skills overall.
Chairman of Washed Up clan
Leader of the Shady Swedes
Team Manager of the Blockhouse Boomers
Leader of the Shady Swedes
Team Manager of the Blockhouse Boomers
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: May 4, 2015
- ESO: PrinceofBabu
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Mitoe wrote:Zamburaks are very good with 1 or 2 upgrades. You should not be afraid to make them, nor should you blindly follow the common "sepoy are OP" belief—because they're not.
Yea sepoy legit
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Why would you make anything other than sepoy as india???
somppukunkku wrote:This is not a fucking discogame.
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
I can't find the Rajput option.
Advantages
1) fast
2) doesn't cost coin
3) snares easily
4) upgrade card in colonial
6) highest base damage vs cav
7) doesn't get countered by a couple skirms
8) good synergy with tiger claws
9) can counter mismicroed goons
Disadvantages
1) a bit worse against heavy infantry than Sepoys
Advantages
1) fast
2) doesn't cost coin
3) snares easily
4) upgrade card in colonial
6) highest base damage vs cav
7) doesn't get countered by a couple skirms
8) good synergy with tiger claws
9) can counter mismicroed goons
Disadvantages
1) a bit worse against heavy infantry than Sepoys
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 2549
- Joined: Jun 28, 2015
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Hazza54321 wrote:Mitoe wrote:Zamburaks are very good with 1 or 2 upgrades. You should not be afraid to make them, nor should you blindly follow the common "sepoy are OP" belief—because they're not.
Yea sepoy legit
i think sepoys are easily the worst heavy inf in the game.
breeze wrote: they cant even guess how much f***ing piece of stupid retarded they look they are trying to give lesson to people who are over pr35 and know the best mu. im pretty sure that we need a page that only pr30+ post and then we could have a nice discussins.
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
So you lost the french-india game cuz blackstar outplayed u so much?lordraphael wrote:i think sepoys are easily the worst heavy inf in the game.
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
i think sepoys are easily the worst heavy inf in the game.
regular musk = 89VSf+41VSg =120VS
Sepoy 107VSf+50VSg=157VS
Sepoy = 30% more expensive then musk
but 26% more HP
15% more melee damage
8% more range damage
10% more siege damage
Ashi
95VSf+66vsg=161vs
Ashi=34% more expensive then musk
13% more HP
Little less melee damage vs cav and LI then musk
4% more range damage
5% more siege
So it's pretty even cost effectively, sepoy vs musk. Saying sepoy is by far the worst HI in the game is a bit exagerating. If any it's ashi.
Didn't do twc inf, but ashi is worser then sepoy and musk.
To see a world in a grain of saind, A heaven in a wild flower
Hold infinity in the palm of you hand, And eternity in an hour
- William Blake, Auguries of Innocence
Hold infinity in the palm of you hand, And eternity in an hour
- William Blake, Auguries of Innocence
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Sepoy are good against tc fire.
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: Sepoy vs Zamburak?
Asateo wrote:i think sepoys are easily the worst heavy inf in the game.
regular musk = 89VSf+41VSg =120VS
Sepoy 107VSf+50VSg=157VS
Sepoy = 30% more expensive then musk
but 26% more HP
15% more melee damage
8% more range damage
10% more siege damage
Ashi
95VSf+66vsg=161vs
Ashi=34% more expensive then musk
13% more HP
Little less melee damage vs cav and LI then musk
4% more range damage
5% more siege
So it's pretty even cost effectively, sepoy vs musk. Saying sepoy is by far the worst HI in the game is a bit exagerating. If any it's ashi.
Didn't do twc inf, but ashi is worser then sepoy and musk.
He was being sarcastic i think. The stats are quite interesting. But dont show the entire picture. Ashi stats are quite bad, until you realise how big 0.5 extra speed is in some situations. And theyre ofc meant to be upgraded a lot. Sepoy stats are kinda close to musks on first glance. Until you take overkill into account. It takes 1 more tc fire shot to kill a sepoy, with an overkill of 78. It takes 5 aennas to one shot a musk, it takes 7 for a sepoy.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests