Questions about what's acceptable

United States of America XeeleeFlower
Retired Contributor
Xeelee Patron
Posts: 1650
Joined: Aug 28, 2016
Location: Netherlands

Questions about what's acceptable

Post by XeeleeFlower »

Hey everyone! Just a couple of questions regarding "gentleman's rules" or whatever you want to call it.

1.) Boxes - cuir/gendarme spams in boxes/ sioux boxes/ other boxes - are these okay or no? I don't really like them whether I'm facing them or have a teammate win the game with them. It just feels wrong...I don't know.

I only play team games and just cringe when I see a French home city from someone I don't know. I just played a game where they told me to rush hard (I was Russia) to let French boom. The rush failed (obv 3v1!), my eco was trashed, I tried to get on sea, but the french player told me no when I tried to build a dock because he was on sea :roll: My own town got hit with a raid so I was in a bad spot. We ended up winning the game though all because of the French box. I was also told to spam opris and hit their eco, which I did, but I didn't receive any satisfaction from it.

2.) Playing on Orinoco - is it wrong to sneak a vil/explorer and build on their side prior to walls being put up? I've had it done to me and it sucks so I'm always prepared for it. I thought I would give it a try , but it made me feel super dirty.

Am I overthinking all this?
Time is wise and our wounds seem to heal to the rhythm of aging,
But our past is a ghost fading out that at night it’s still haunting.

http://www.galactanet.com/oneoff/theegg_mod.html
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by pecelot »

Both are pretty lame, the former apparently is that not tough to counter, although the latter is definitely against so-called gentlemen rules.
User avatar
Sweden Gendarme
Gendarme
Donator 03
Posts: 5132
Joined: Sep 11, 2016
ESO: Gendarme

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by Gendarme »

What the hell are boxes?
Pay more attention to detail.
User avatar
South Africa mGravitus
Musketeer
Posts: 74
Joined: Jun 16, 2016

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by mGravitus »

Gendarme wrote:What the hell are boxes?

I thought boxes was where you grouped a ranged cav archer with a bunch of melee? So they are all clumped together.
Really cheezy for orpich raids.
Image
User avatar
Sweden Gendarme
Gendarme
Donator 03
Posts: 5132
Joined: Sep 11, 2016
ESO: Gendarme

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by Gendarme »

I thought it only worked with ruyters.
Pay more attention to detail.
User avatar
New Zealand JakeyBoyTH
Howdah
Posts: 1744
Joined: Oct 15, 2016
ESO: Ex-Contributor
Location: New Zealand

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by JakeyBoyTH »

Both are extremely lame. I usually leave.
Some people tried it with me and still lost heavily.

Boxes are ok if you do it on Orinoco when you are fighting, but not river laming. If you group up the Zapotec / Maya into a box they can be pretty efficient in taking out cannon.

IMO french are a joke if you are playing NR55 on Orinoco. Fur Trade is too powerful. Not that they can't be beaten of course, but they do have a bit of an advantage.
Advanced Wonders suck

- Aizamk

Ugh Advanced Wonders suck

- Aizamk
User avatar
Great Britain britishmusketeer
Howdah
Posts: 1845
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by britishmusketeer »

XeeleeFlower wrote:Hey everyone! Just a couple of questions regarding "gentleman's rules" or whatever you want to call it.

1.) Boxes - cuir/gendarme spams in boxes/ sioux boxes/ other boxes - are these okay or no? I don't really like them whether I'm facing them or have a teammate win the game with them. It just feels wrong...I don't know.

I only play team games and just cringe when I see a French home city from someone I don't know. I just played a game where they told me to rush hard (I was Russia) to let French boom. The rush failed (obv 3v1!), my eco was trashed, I tried to get on sea, but the french player told me no when I tried to build a dock because he was on sea :roll: My own town got hit with a raid so I was in a bad spot. We ended up winning the game though all because of the French box. I was also told to spam opris and hit their eco, which I did, but I didn't receive any satisfaction from it.

2.) Playing on Orinoco - is it wrong to sneak a vil/explorer and build on their side prior to walls being put up? I've had it done to me and it sucks so I'm always prepared for it. I thought I would give it a try , but it made me feel super dirty.

Am I overthinking all this?

If you are talking about treaty:
1) boxes are considered acceptable however most games not on the treaty patch ban french.
2) Most treaty games have a 'half map' (and no warship) rules which mean that you can't have vills on their side of the map before the treaty ends.
In low level treaty games these rules aren't in place howver so stuff like having 50 jags in stealth on your facs at the end of treaty is quite common. Not really much you can do about this unfortunately :/

If you are talking about standard supremacy:
1) Again the same as before but ideally you will want to win the game against french before it gets to lategame. Usually if someone makes a box of mass cav you can counter it with mass goons of yourself which will be super cost efficient for you provided you have good scouting/walling. Against Russia i would make sure you always have goons or equivalent out in order to be able to deal with opris.
2)Orinoco is not really a competitive map in supremacy however if you were playing it i guess it would play out like indochina so sneaking a vill to the other side is a good idea(not considered dirty).
United States of America XeeleeFlower
Retired Contributor
Xeelee Patron
Posts: 1650
Joined: Aug 28, 2016
Location: Netherlands

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by XeeleeFlower »

Just to clarify, these are standard supremacy games. Thanks for the replies thus far. :) I've never done a box, but have been called a noob for not doing so.
Time is wise and our wounds seem to heal to the rhythm of aging,
But our past is a ghost fading out that at night it’s still haunting.

http://www.galactanet.com/oneoff/theegg_mod.html
User avatar
Canada _NiceKING_
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sep 16, 2015
ESO: _NiceKING_
GameRanger ID: 9999999
Clan: Xbox

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by _NiceKING_ »

JakeyBoyTH wrote:IMO french are a joke if you are playing NR55 on Orinoco. Fur Trade is too powerful. Not that they can't be beaten of course, but they do have a bit of an advantage.

France has advantages everywhere lol
Best skirms, strong eco, 120 military pop, best natives, best cav, best artillery.
User avatar
Sweden Gendarme
Gendarme
Donator 03
Posts: 5132
Joined: Sep 11, 2016
ESO: Gendarme

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by Gendarme »

You forgot best language.

_NiceKING_ wrote:best cav
Thanks for the shoutout, though.
Pay more attention to detail.
User avatar
New Zealand JakeyBoyTH
Howdah
Posts: 1744
Joined: Oct 15, 2016
ESO: Ex-Contributor
Location: New Zealand

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by JakeyBoyTH »

_NiceKING_ wrote:
JakeyBoyTH wrote:IMO french are a joke if you are playing NR55 on Orinoco. Fur Trade is too powerful. Not that they can't be beaten of course, but they do have a bit of an advantage.

France has advantages everywhere lol
Best skirms, strong eco, 120 military pop, best natives, best cav, best artillery.


Thats what I mean. Although I think Spain has better nats. They are just OP asf.
Advanced Wonders suck

- Aizamk

Ugh Advanced Wonders suck

- Aizamk
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
Gendarme
Posts: 9314
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by zoom »

XeeleeFlower wrote:Hey everyone! Just a couple of questions regarding "gentleman's rules" or whatever you want to call it.

1.) Boxes - cuir/gendarme spams in boxes/ sioux boxes/ other boxes - are these okay or no? I don't really like them whether I'm facing them or have a teammate win the game with them. It just feels wrong...I don't know.

I only play team games and just cringe when I see a French home city from someone I don't know. I just played a game where they told me to rush hard (I was Russia) to let French boom. The rush failed (obv 3v1!), my eco was trashed, I tried to get on sea, but the french player told me no when I tried to build a dock because he was on sea :roll: My own town got hit with a raid so I was in a bad spot. We ended up winning the game though all because of the French box. I was also told to spam opris and hit their eco, which I did, but I didn't receive any satisfaction from it.

2.) Playing on Orinoco - is it wrong to sneak a vil/explorer and build on their side prior to walls being put up? I've had it done to me and it sucks so I'm always prepared for it. I thought I would give it a try , but it made me feel super dirty.

Am I overthinking all this?
In Supremacy, yes. In treaty, no. Treaty players can be very... disturbed.
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
Gendarme
Posts: 9314
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by zoom »

_NiceKING_ wrote:
JakeyBoyTH wrote:IMO french are a joke if you are playing NR55 on Orinoco. Fur Trade is too powerful. Not that they can't be beaten of course, but they do have a bit of an advantage.

France has advantages everywhere lol
Best skirms, strong eco, 120 military pop, best natives, best cav, best artillery.
Indeed; 'tis very unrealistic.
User avatar
Brazil macacoalbino
Howdah
Posts: 1305
Joined: Apr 2, 2015
ESO: MacacoAlbino
Clan: 3Huss

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by macacoalbino »

XeeleeFlower wrote:2.) Playing on Orinoco - is it wrong to sneak a vil/explorer and build on their side prior to walls being put up? I've had it done to me and it sucks so I'm always prepared for it. I thought I would give it a try , but it made me feel super dirty.

55min of your life just thrown into the trashcan xD
Image

Image
User avatar
Poland pecelot
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 10459
Joined: Mar 25, 2015
ESO: Pezet

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by pecelot »

zoom wrote:In Supremacy, yes. In treaty, no. Treaty players can be very... disturbed.

Treaty is technically supremacy :!: :hmm:

Gendarme wrote:I thought it only worked with ruyters.

It works with every type of light cavalry :ugeek:
User avatar
Canada _NiceKING_
Retired Contributor
Donator 01
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sep 16, 2015
ESO: _NiceKING_
GameRanger ID: 9999999
Clan: Xbox

Re: Questions about what's acceptable

Post by _NiceKING_ »

it also works with some heavy cavalry like Sioux WC :ugeek:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV