Lb pike vs lb musk
Lb pike vs lb musk
Why would anyone make lb pike when you could make lb musk? Sure the macro is harder, but that isn't an excuse. The only downside I see to going lb musk is that it costs more food.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
- Mr_Bramboy
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: [VOC] Bram
- Location: Amsterdam
Lb pike vs lb musk
Pikemen have quite the sexy posture if you ask me
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Lb pike vs lb musk
Hum, pikes can tank in cover mode while lb rape.
Lb pike vs lb musk
ovi12 wrote:Why would anyone make lb pike when you could make lb musk? Sure the macro is harder, but that isn''t an excuse. The only downside I see to going lb musk is that it costs more food.
lb pike is better. If you go lb surely you put vills to wood - food mainly. So it''s easier add pike than musk
- DerMaxinator
- Dragoon
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Apr 1, 2015
- ESO: DerMax
- Location: Dresden
Lb pike vs lb musk
But Musk also have good DPS, and if you have enough you could go for raid with themgarja wrote:pikes cost less and do the same thing, meatshield lbows.
Ain't no skills in makin' vills
Lb pike vs lb musk
I'd say you'd prefer not having a 3 res type army early on, because then you'll have to invest in three market upgrades, instead of two. But later on, its probably better to do musk longbow (huss) I suppose.
Lb pike vs lb musk
dermaxinator wrote:But Musk also have good DPS, and if you have enough you could go for raid with themgarja wrote:pikes cost less and do the same thing, meatshield lbows.
obviously musk are better than pike they can also shot by far while opponents army are go back. The point is you should go pikes because they cost wood food like bows. So you dont need to switch some vills on gold though. Oh pikes are very good to destroy buildings so nice combo pike lbs.
Lb pike vs lb musk
But in general skirm+musk>'musk huss, while skirm+pike<'musk hussgarja wrote:pikes cost less and do the same thing, meatshield lbows.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Lb pike vs lb musk
Harder macro is not an excuse for not making a certain unit.marco1698 wrote:obviously musk are better than pike they can also shot by far while opponents army are go back. The point is you should go pikes because they cost wood food like bows. So you dont need to switch some vills on gold though. Oh pikes are very good to destroy buildings so nice combo pike lbs.dermaxinator wrote:But Musk also have good DPS, and if you have enough you could go for raid with them
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Lb pike vs lb musk
Musk can''t tank as well but make up for it by doing damage themselves.diarouga wrote:Hum, pikes can tank in cover mode while lb rape.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Lb pike vs lb musk
Pike are cheaper and tank more.ovi12 wrote:Musk cant tank as well but make up for it by doing damage themselves.diarouga wrote:Hum, pikes can tank in cover mode while lb rape.
Lb pike vs lb musk
ovi12 wrote:Harder macro is not an excuse for not making a certain unit.marco1698 wrote: obviously musk are better than pike they can also shot by far while opponents army are go back. The point is you should go pikes because they cost wood food like bows. So you dont need to switch some vills on gold though. Oh pikes are very good to destroy buildings so nice combo pike lbs.
If you dont accept an opinion just dont make this thread. Pikes better definitely. I am not the only one who think this.
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Lb pike vs lb musk
I wouldnt say that pikes are always better but in most cases they are.marco1698 wrote:If you dont accept an opinion just dont make this thread. Pikes better definitely. I am not the only one who think this.ovi12 wrote:Harder macro is not an excuse for not making a certain unit.
Lb pike vs lb musk
it's not harder macro is unefficient macro. As I said the only reason why don't go full lbow is to have a meatshield vs cav or to siege. Pikes do both things better per cost.
Also moving vills from gold to wood and viceversa is unefficient.
Also moving vills from gold to wood and viceversa is unefficient.
Lb pike vs lb musk
mass musk with a few longbow does well. but in lb pike combo, it usually becomes mass lb and a few pikes.
Lb pike vs lb musk
Faster train time makes sense, but the costs are very close.deleted_user wrote:If I''m going lbow pike chances are I''m being aggressive. You can just mass more pikes than musk in the early game and get more out of them that way. Cheaper cost, shorter train time, higher siege damage. They''re really helpful in the early game. However I think you have to transition to lbow musk after a while because at a certain point pikes just don''t seem to cut it. Plus you have OP musk upgrades in colonial you can utilize and then begin to mix in cav which gets pretty scary for the other player.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Lb pike vs lb musk
Yeah, musks are only 4 villseconds more expensive. I think that in mid to late colonial, musks are the superior choice, but early on the market upgrades are too expensive to get all three of them.ovi12 wrote:Faster train time makes sense, but the costs are very close.deleted_user wrote:If Im going lbow pike chances are Im being aggressive. You can just mass more pikes than musk in the early game and get more out of them that way. Cheaper cost, shorter train time, higher siege damage. Theyre really helpful in the early game. However I think you have to transition to lbow musk after a while because at a certain point pikes just dont seem to cut it. Plus you have OP musk upgrades in colonial you can utilize and then begin to mix in cav which gets pretty scary for the other player.
- KINGofOsmane
- Pro Player
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Feb 24, 2015
- ESO: KINGofOsmane
- Location: Walling Town
Lb pike vs lb musk
I hope they dont cheat ')diarouga wrote:Pike are cheater and tank more.ovi12 wrote:Musk cant tank as well but make up for it by doing damage themselves.
"Losing to Callen was the worst night of my life" Gibthedurrty 2019
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
Tete cs:go experienceLecastete wrote: Dude i hate this game. I am bad and i also dont have luck
Lb pike vs lb musk
lbs to be aggressive? since when?
Don't let the things you can't change dictate your life.
- [Armag] diarouga
- Ninja
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
- ESO: diarouga
- Location: France
Lb pike vs lb musk
-_-kingofosmane wrote:I hope they dont cheat ')diarouga wrote:Pike are cheater and tank more.
Lb pike vs lb musk
jerom wrote:Yeah, musks are only 4 villseconds more expensive. I think that in mid to late colonial, musks are the superior choice, but early on the market upgrades are too expensive to get all three of them.ovi12 wrote:Faster train time makes sense, but the costs are very close.
more siege per cost, better anti-cav per cost, lower training time per cost
and they cost the same type of resources as longbows
i think this is why pikes are better than musks in this context ^^
- KINGofOsmane
- Pro Player
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Feb 24, 2015
- ESO: KINGofOsmane
- Location: Walling Town
Lb pike vs lb musk
<'3diarouga wrote:-_-kingofosmane wrote:I hope they dont cheat ')
"Losing to Callen was the worst night of my life" Gibthedurrty 2019
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
Tete cs:go experienceLecastete wrote: Dude i hate this game. I am bad and i also dont have luck
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests