vardar wrote:@
oxaloacetate I am not against using many of the drugs you listed on occasion, there is a time and a place. There is a problem though. People rely on them way too much and most importantly, healthcare should not be a multi billion dollar "business." Where doctors are bribed to be used as "pill mills" for particular drug companies. I'm sure you are familiar.
https://www.northpointrecovery.com/blog ... ed-states/
I totally agree. These are good thoughts and being sceptical is not a bad thing.
vardar wrote:But, there are natural resources on this earth that we can use to live healthy and productive lives as well. One of these options are essential oils.
If essential oils was produced by big pharma, would you still advocate it? Although being fairly inexpensive, there are still people monetizing of essential oils, right?
vardar wrote:I have not taken any synthetic drug in years and, admittedly, have no vaccines. Not that vaccines give you autism or anything, but it is the route my family has taken and the route I am now taking on my own will. You'd be surprised on some of the things people have said because of my lack of vaccines and dislike for drugs such as Advil, Aspirin, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, etc.
We are young, healthy and in-shape. It is unlikely for us to be ill enough to need treatment. I haven't taken any pain killers in years either. However, it is due to not being sufficiently ill - not a statement.
vardar wrote:Hope this gives some clarity and I can always give you a myriad of links to interesting studies and discussions on the usage of essential oils. They do a bit more than act "a little bit like yoga and meditation" haha
Please do.
vardar wrote:As far as the vaccine question, I really have no qualms with it. But when the government mandates vaccines is when I have a problem. Let people decide there own path in regards to health. Just educate and then let them decide.
Good. I hope you continuously reevaluate your position. I once spoke to a mom who refused her kids vaccines due to disease in question being rare. Which is logically flawed, because it is made rare by vaccines.
Let me pose a question: There's a sick child. The little boy of two years old has a chronic condition to which blood transfusion is the cure. The parents however are Jehova's witnesses and refuse the procedure, as it goes against their books.
Do you still think 'just educating them and then let them decide' to be a valid mode of action?
Oxa.