Goodspeed wrote:That hasn't been my experience. Besides I don't want anything to do with people who only take me seriously if I dress fashionably so that works out great.
Post your fit, bish
Goodspeed wrote:That hasn't been my experience. Besides I don't want anything to do with people who only take me seriously if I dress fashionably so that works out great.
Define "judged". You can tell some things about a person's character based on how they dress, so it's fair to "judge" people that way. And if that type of person is one you tend not to get along with, it's understandable if you judge them negatively. I for one am less inclined to go talk to a person who spends much thought and money to dress fashionably than to a person who dresses practically. To me, the latter seems more like someone who has their priorities straight.Gendarme wrote:@Goodspeed Is your opinion that people shouldn't be judged at all by their choice of clothing,
I don't get your meaning here.or just to the extent they are today?
Goodspeed wrote:Define "judged". You can tell some things about a person's character based on how they dress, so it's fair to "judge" people that way. And if that type of person is one you tend not to get along with, it's understandable if you judge them negatively. I for one am less inclined to go talk to a person who spends much thought and money to dress fashionably than to a person who dresses practically. To me, the latter seems more like someone who has their priorities straight.Gendarme wrote:@Goodspeed Is your opinion that people shouldn't be judged at all by their choice of clothing,
But that doesn't mean I wouldn't talk to the former person at all. You can spot certain character traits by how people dress, but certainly not all of them and not the most important ones either. Ear mentioned one "wouldn't be taken seriously" if they dress "poorly". Someone who takes it as far as that I wouldn't want anything to do with because if they aren't willing to look past a disagreement about priorities when it comes to how to dress slash how to spend money, they clearly lack perspective.I don't get your meaning here.or just to the extent they are today?
fightinfrenchman wrote:I wonder what percentage of users on this forum wear cargo shorts
There's an actual dress code? Then you're certainly not interviewing someone in my line of work. Sure, for many positions there are actual dress codes and it would be perfectly fair to dismiss someone if they failed to dress the part. I wouldn't want a job like that. It attracts a certain type of person, which I am not and tend not to get along with, either. That's what I meant earlier when I said I would sooner befriend someone who dressed practically, rather than fashionably.Gendarme wrote:@Goodspeed Most people dress "appropriately" because they realise that they would be at a disadvantage otherwise. Consequently someone who does not is most likely either ignorant to that fact or being rebellious, both of which are unwanted traits whether the dress-code is something with which the beholder agrees or not.
What are you interviewing them for? Is there an actual dress code? If you're interviewing them for a technical position you are wrong in my opinion to dismiss people who don't care as much about appearances, because that kind of thing actually hints at other character traits that you may specifically be looking for.In other words, even if I loved the appearance of hoodies I would certainly not take a job-applicant who wears a hoodie on his CV-picture to an interview as it shows that he is most likely either ignorant of the dress-code (i.e. living under a stone) or not being serious about getting the job (i.e. rebelling against the dress-code is more important than the job).
Wrong? I would go with subjective. In my very subjective opinion, money is better spent on other things especially since keeping up with fashion is a rather expensive hobby. It depends entirely on who you're trying to impress and what line of work you're in. I personally have never cared about fashion and it hasn't hindered me in anything. In fact, if it prevented certain people from coming up to me to have a chit chat, all the better.This still applies in our daily lives, of course, just to a lesser extent. The person who spends money dressing fashionably may not do that because he believes it to be the inherently good thing to do, but because he realises that he would be at a disadvantage if he didn't even in the daily life. Your assessment that this person does not have his priorities straight seems wrong to me.
deleted_user wrote:I dress both fashionably and how I want with a single pair of jeans, Hanes a-shirts, a handful of $20 old navy button ups, and a pair of leather boots or two.
evilcheadar wrote:jeans are op as are cargo, don't forget jorts
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?