n0eL wrote:NPR, New York Times, Washington post
What makes these real news venues? because they are owned by the top 6 corporations that control 2000 news media outlets? they all have an agenda and can't be trusted.
n0eL wrote:NPR, New York Times, Washington post
howlingwolfpaw wrote:n0eL wrote:NPR, New York Times, Washington post
What makes these real news venues? because they are owned by the top 6 corporations that control 2000 news media outlets? they all have an agenda and can't be trusted.
howlingwolfpaw wrote:your right I do have an agenda to expose the corruption and crimes. So I can not be trusted to be silent on the issues.
howlingwolfpaw wrote:your right I do have an agenda to expose the corruption and crimes. So I can not be trusted to be silent on the issues.
Metis wrote:A country constantly being at war isn't a new thing, no matter who is president or what the current "war power" laws are. There has not been a ten-year period in the USA's history that it hasn't been involved in some conflict, and you can probably say the same for Britain too and for other countries at the height of their empire, such as France, Rome, Greece, etc. Warfare is just a reality for a large, powerful geopolitical entity. The only reason that some smaller countries get away with being "peaceful" is that they have signed treaties so that somebody else's soldiers will protect them, or are so isolated or non-consequential resource-wise that nobody cares to try to take them over.
Metis wrote:A country constantly being at war isn't a new thing, no matter who is president or what the current "war power" laws are. There has not been a ten-year period in the USA's history that it hasn't been involved in some conflict, and you can probably say the same for Britain too and for other countries at the height of their empire, such as France, Rome, Greece, etc. Warfare is just a reality for a large, powerful geopolitical entity. The only reason that some smaller countries get away with being "peaceful" is that they have signed treaties so that somebody else's soldiers will protect them, or are so isolated or non-consequential resource-wise that nobody cares to try to take them over.
Jerom wrote:Yeag exactly. Just look at switzerland!
Laurence Drake wrote:Sweden is overpowered
Laurence Drake wrote:Europe would be a superpower if its people hadn't all moved to america
howlingwolfpaw wrote:I am part swedish! going through some old photographs today we have one of our ancestors from the 1850's. They lived in a brick/stone house/cabin shaped like a ] with vertical wood siding for the roof triangles like an old barn, out in a grassy country side. It was beautiful.
Metis wrote:Laurence Drake wrote:Europe would be a superpower if its people hadn't all moved to america
That's one reason why America is so strong -- many of the most adventurous of the people of other countries came here to live.
Goodspeed wrote:Metis wrote:Laurence Drake wrote:Europe would be a superpower if its people hadn't all moved to america
That's one reason why America is so strong -- many of the most adventurous of the people of other countries came here to live.
Lol more like the rejects
Goodspeed wrote:Metis wrote:Laurence Drake wrote:Europe would be a superpower if its people hadn't all moved to america
That's one reason why America is so strong -- many of the most adventurous of the people of other countries came here to live.
Lol more like the rejects
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?