On the resource checking...

[dave_12]

Show hidden quotes

Randomness is the best thing of this game.
Thank you for not reading the post anyway.

ok so lets play all games on RE bayou, sonora and patagonia from now on!

I still rather play those maps than have perfectly symmetrical maps with 3 hunts every game. I actually rather play tetris. At least I get random blocks and have to use my mind to win and not just play down 1 fucking way like solving a rubics cube

So go play tetris lol. What a load of bullshit.

are u a morron? or you just cant read? I was trying to make a point that playing this game when you ALWAYS have symmetrical maps with 3 hunts would be super boring.
Having random spawns and maybe a shift towards one mapside in hunts or mines is a necessary part of the game.

Go play tetris.

[Garja]

Doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Rehosts should be avoided if possible, but it's not the end of the world if a caster makes a bad rehost call. It doesn't take more than 1-2 mins of the players/viewers time.

It's not just that. It's preventing certain spawns to happen. Basically it's a tendency to conform maps to a very dull standard. Not to mention I've seen casters rehost ok spawns and allow unfair spawns.
I'm not saying maps shouldn't be rehosted. I'm just saying to improve the decision making.

[bwinner]

Indeed I don't think someone else than you complains about this @Garja , so if you want you can just tell the casters that you don't mind missing some hunts/mines when you play and they won't rehost.

[Garja]

I think you didn't get my point.

[Kaiserklein]

No one does

[Garja]

lol

[SoldieR]

It's pretty simple.
Garja wants variety on, not just maps, but FAIR map spawns.

How do you have such a long discussion when its so simple

[jesus3]

because of egos, ain't no proper discussion without completely ignoring the actual point

[Kaiserklein]

The problem is he's always pissed when his maps are rehosted, no matter how unfair the spawn was. For him as long as you have the "minimum guaranteed" resources, everything is fine. So having only 1 hunt when your opponent has 3 on fertile crescent is fine because 1 hunt is enough, you know. And obviously, because he made the map, he knows much better than everyone else what a fair spawn is, and since his opinion is actually the absolute truth (he calls his own ideas "facts" usually), he has the right to school 90% of the community

[Garja]

Exactly.
Except I do care about the fairness of the map which is the whole point of this thread.

[momuuu]

The problem is he's always pissed when his maps are rehosted, no matter how unfair the spawn was. For him as long as you have the "minimum guaranteed" resources, everything is fine. So having only 1 hunt when your opponent has 3 on fertile crescent is fine because 1 hunt is enough, you know. And obviously, because he made the map, he knows much better than everyone else what a fair spawn is, and since his opinion is actually the absolute truth (he calls his own ideas "facts" usually), he has the right to school 90% of the community

This.

There is some point that sometimes maps are rehosted when its okay ("this 4th hunt is just a bit closer and this player is missing his 7th hunt lets rehost") but the time garja started complaining was with an atrocious spawn that was not competitive in any sense.