Page 2 of 3

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:04
by lordraphael
umeu wrote:
lordraphael wrote:ESOC itself conducted this attack to make madrouga seem more guilty. Unfortunately it backfired as rouga was streaming simulatenously. 10 /10 for effort , 1/ 10 for execution. Better luck next time !


not saying he did it, but why can't you ddos + stream? isnt ddos something you set up and then let happen while you go drink a coffee + have a 1 hour shit mcjim style?

i have no idea how ddos works mate

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:14
by zoom
umeu wrote:
lordraphael wrote:ESOC itself conducted this attack to make madrouga seem more guilty. Unfortunately it backfired as rouga was streaming simulatenously. 10 /10 for effort , 1/ 10 for execution. Better luck next time !


not saying he did it, but why can't you ddos + stream? isnt ddos something you set up and then let happen while you go drink a coffee + have a 1 hour shit mcjim style?
Let alone do externally while behind a proxy in the first place.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:15
by zoom
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.
Ha! I knew it! I knew it was Goodspeed, all along!!

J'accuse, Mart!

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:18
by benj89
so who did it

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:48
by zoom
Are you blind, man! It's clearly Rutger!

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 14:52
by zoom
deleted_user wrote:never trust a doggo wearing a flak mask
Actually, that is quite the good advice.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 15:54
by momuuu
Just stop blaming people pls

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 16:04
by Rikikipu
I heard the dos was managed by dutch government who couldn't stand anymore opwillem memes on esoc

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 18:18
by Mr_Bramboy
Rikikipu wrote:I heard the dos was managed by dutch government who couldn't stand anymore opwillem memes on esoc

I would like to neerhispanjeer this post.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 18:27
by noissance
All of this was my secret wide scale test muhahahaha

[spoiler=spoiler]Just Kidding! No expertise with hacking[/spoiler]

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 18:45
by Jaeger
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.

Why would you not be allowed to say?

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 19:06
by Cometk
ovi12 wrote:
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.

Why would you not be allowed to say?

unprofessional

it would also give the perpetrator the attention he's desperate for

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 19:16
by Gendarme
I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 19:20
by lemmings121
Gendarme wrote:I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?


apperently he did brag about it.. lol

Cometk wrote:
ovi12 wrote:
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.

Why would you not be allowed to say?

unprofessional

it would also give the perpetrator the attention he's desperate for


yep.
better just deal with it in the tech side of the site, no need to bring atention to the person.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 19:30
by _H2O
Yeah I wouldn't worry about the DDOS as a community. We have faced similar problems over the past two years and will continue to do our best to handle them.

It's unfortunate because it takes away time from cool things we are doing, but we have to handle security.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 20:01
by Mr_Bramboy
ovi12 wrote:
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.

Why would you not be allowed to say?

Because it doesn't help us with anything. If anything it makes us look just as bad. We at ESOC strive to host tournaments and continue to be a hub for the community. We have no desire to publicly shame anyone, regardless of the situation.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 06 Apr 2017, 22:47
by kami_ryu
Mr_Bramboy wrote:
ovi12 wrote:
Mr_Bramboy wrote:We know who was behind the DoS attacks. It was not diarouga, but I don't think I'm allowed to say who it was, so I won't. There's no need to accuse diarouga without any proof or knowledge of the situation, though.

Why would you not be allowed to say?

Because it doesn't help us with anything. If anything it makes us look just as bad. We at ESOC strive to host tournaments and continue to be a hub for the community. We have no desire to publicly shame anyone, regardless of the situation.


That's fine and all, but whom do we pitch with our forks?

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 00:18
by zoom
lemmings121 wrote:
Gendarme wrote:I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?


apperently he did brag about it.. lol
Nothing was bragged about; Neurouga was automatically presumed guilty.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 03:20
by JakeyBoyTH
Gendarme wrote:I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?

No anyone can do them really. I've been behind some before.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 13:56
by lemmings121
zoom wrote:
lemmings121 wrote:
Gendarme wrote:I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?


apperently he did brag about it.. lol
Nothing was bragged about; Neurouga was automatically presumed guilty.


erm,... i'm not talking about neuron or diarouga, i didnt say any name. lol

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 14:00
by edeholland
JakeyBoyTH wrote:
Gendarme wrote:I thought DoS attacks were services bought on the (deep?) web. Unless the attacker brags about it, how is even possible to find out who he is?

No anyone can do them really. I've been behind some before.


DDOS attacks, which are Distributed DOS attacks, can be bought, where you basically hire a botnet to work for you.

You can also buy DOS attack I assume, but this is also something most script kiddies can do themselves.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 14:25
by dietschlander
I do think the community has the right to name and shame.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 18:45
by zoom
lemmings121 wrote:
zoom wrote:
lemmings121 wrote:
apperently he did brag about it.. lol
Nothing was bragged about; Neurouga was automatically presumed guilty.


erm,... i'm not talking about neuron or diarouga, i didnt say any name. lol
Actually, you did. I didn't.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 18:46
by zoom
It does. Conversely, the community has the right to ban me.

Re: DoS attack on ESOC

Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 19:09
by lemmings121
zoom wrote:
lemmings121 wrote:
zoom wrote:Nothing was bragged about; Neurouga was automatically presumed guilty.


erm,... i'm not talking about neuron or diarouga, i didnt say any name. lol
Actually, you did. I didn't.



wtf is wrong with you?