User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

20 Jul 2016, 10:58

P i k i l i c wrote:
Garja wrote:- Somehow the resqued village from treasure (in the Painted Desert treasure set atleast) speaks english even if you are playing a native civ.

I just played China on Arkansas and got a villager treasure. This villager spoke Russian when I selected him but Chinese for all tasks he was assigned
Please confirm that it spoke Russian every time you selected it and not only the first immediately after rescue.
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
User avatar
France P i k i l i c
Dragoon
 
Posts: 469
ESO: Pikilic
Location: Dijon, France
  • Link to post
  • Quote

20 Jul 2016, 11:55

zoom wrote:Please confirm that it spoke Russian every time you selected it and not only the first immediately after rescue.
I confirm, I selected and ordered him several times to be sure
Tokugawa does not participate in childish races for treasure.
- Tokugawa

EP banner :hmm:
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

20 Jul 2016, 12:29

Tanks.
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
User avatar
France iNcog
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 9257
ESO: status = SAVED!!1²
Location: LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION
  • Link to post
  • Quote

20 Jul 2016, 12:50

ty m8
Fear is freedom! Subjugation is liberation! Contradiction is truth!
Austria knusch
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 168
  • Link to post
  • Quote

10 Aug 2016, 12:55

3. The Chinese Consulate Blockhouse can't train Banner Armies. (Solution set to obtainable.)

got that fixed? coz atm those available armies r bugged. some r actually quit "lets say unique" (imperial army xD)
User avatar
France Kaiserklein
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 3507
Location: Paris
  • Link to post
  • Quote

10 Aug 2016, 15:15

Hey I was playing with aiz recently and we noticed that the infantry breastplate from arsenal now gives +15% hp instead of the former +10%. I don't recall any patch change about this so I guess it's a bug, and a pretty big one
"Interactive stream" !

Auch wenn du so weit weg bist, habe ich nur einen Traum: dich zu küssen, neben mir zu spüren und in meinen Armen zu halten.

Image
Great Britain Hazza54321
Jaeger
 
Posts: 2871
  • Link to post
  • Quote

10 Aug 2016, 15:29

ive noticed CIR gives x3 vs goon also
"i should win"
Great Britain Hazza54321
Jaeger
 
Posts: 2871
  • Link to post
  • Quote

10 Aug 2016, 15:29

and the china bh is fucked
"i should win"
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

10 Aug 2016, 16:40

Unfortunately there was a misunderstanding and some bug fixes that were not simple enough to make without further consideration were included. Expectedly, this will be addressed in the near future.

Thank you to everyone for noticing and noting bugs in general, and meta-bugs in particular.
:flowers:
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
User avatar
Serbia Atomiswave
Lancer
 
Posts: 659
  • Link to post
  • Quote

27 Aug 2016, 17:29

zoom wrote:Unfortunately there was a misunderstanding and some bug fixes that were not simple enough to make without further consideration were included. Expectedly, this will be addressed in the near future.

Thank you to everyone for noticing and noting bugs in general, and meta-bugs in particular.
:flowers:


Does ep team plan to fix more bugs?
User avatar
Poland pecelot
ESOC Community Team
 
Posts: 6328
ESO: Pezet
Location: Warsaw, Poland
  • Link to post
  • Quote

27 Aug 2016, 19:40

Well, apparently dragoon-type units don't receive any multipliers against Sioux warchief despite the fact that it should be the case based on the stats. Goons have a bonus vs hand cav, which the WC obviously is, and yet just normal damage is done. That's a bug for sure!
My Tips of the Day and COMPSTOMP threads! :flowers:
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

28 Aug 2016, 13:00

Atomiswave wrote:
zoom wrote:Unfortunately there was a misunderstanding and some bug fixes that were not simple enough to make without further consideration were included. Expectedly, this will be addressed in the near future.

Thank you to everyone for noticing and noting bugs in general, and meta-bugs in particular.
:flowers:


Does ep team plan to fix more bugs?
We can only hope. It really depends on Goodspeed and the modders. iCourt hasn't been in for a while, but he'll be back soon enough – with any luck.
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
User avatar
France Kaiserklein
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 3507
Location: Paris
  • Link to post
  • Quote

28 Aug 2016, 14:37

pecelot wrote:Well, apparently dragoon-type units don't receive any multipliers against Sioux warchief despite the fact that it should be the case based on the stats. Goons have a bonus vs hand cav, which the WC obviously is, and yet just normal damage is done. That's a bug for sure!

No that's not a bug, it's intended. Goons actually don't have a multiplier vs hand cav but vs "heavy cav".
For example, sioux hero and indian explorers are hand cav but no heavy cav, which means heavy infantry will counter them but ranged cav won't. On the other hand, rifle riders are heavy cav so they get rekt by goons despite not being hand cav.
"Interactive stream" !

Auch wenn du so weit weg bist, habe ich nur einen Traum: dich zu küssen, neben mir zu spüren und in meinen Armen zu halten.

Image
User avatar
Poland pecelot
ESOC Community Team
 
Posts: 6328
ESO: Pezet
Location: Warsaw, Poland
  • Link to post
  • Quote

28 Aug 2016, 21:49

Image
My Tips of the Day and COMPSTOMP threads! :flowers:
User avatar
United States of America Vickyxxx5528
Crossbow
 
Posts: 40
ESO: Kikk
  • Link to post
  • Quote

02 Sep 2016, 23:30

Hey guys I had to reinstall everything, Erm I'm not sure how to post on here but now I cant ESOC patch of choosing gameranger instead of ESO, please help :(
The Otto Lamer Girl
User avatar
France Kaiserklein
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 3507
Location: Paris
  • Link to post
  • Quote

03 Sep 2016, 04:29

Vickyyyy
I think you should create your own thread here : viewforum.php?f=65
And try to give further explanation too
"Interactive stream" !

Auch wenn du so weit weg bist, habe ich nur einen Traum: dich zu küssen, neben mir zu spüren und in meinen Armen zu halten.

Image
Netherlands Denalin
Crossbow
 
Posts: 5
ESO: Denalin
  • Link to post
  • Quote

18 Oct 2016, 19:19

Longtime lurker, first time poster.
What, if any, has been the discussion around putting gates over trade routes? It exists in the campaign, and since day 1 I've always felt this was a clear oversight of the game's design, particularly on maps where the trade route is close to TC. My assumption was always that it was too difficult to implement by the game's deadline and they just never did it. Anyone have a valid argument against this?

Clearly, addressing this would affect the game's meta in some way, but make for a much better experience overall.
I know there are some mods that address this; to me the best option from a playability perspective would be to only allow long walls to be placed in a mostly perpendicular fashion over the trade route, and having any wall placed over a trade route automatically change to a gate and factor in the additional cost.
User avatar
Czech Republic EAGLEMUT
ESOC Dev Team
 
Posts: 1272
ESO: EAGLEMUT
Location: [WPact]
  • Link to post
  • Quote

18 Oct 2016, 20:31

Welcome, there has been no such discussion that I know of. Would be better to discuss this in a new thread, since it is definitely not a bug fix.
Note that EP aims to make only as minimal changes to the game as possible, while maintaining a more balanced experienced than the official RE patch. For that reason I am skeptical a change of this magnitude would be accepted, but it's worth a discussion I guess.
Image
User avatar
Poland pecelot
ESOC Community Team
 
Posts: 6328
ESO: Pezet
Location: Warsaw, Poland
  • Link to post
  • Quote

18 Oct 2016, 22:21

I've seen it working in the Improvement Mod, so it's definitely doable, but on a map like ESOC Florida it would help people wall up themselves, which I can see some being reluctant to... :hmm:
Otherwise, I'm all for that! :smile:
My Tips of the Day and COMPSTOMP threads! :flowers:
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

19 Oct 2016, 04:59

Denalin wrote:Longtime lurker, first time poster.
What, if any, has been the discussion around putting gates over trade routes? It exists in the campaign, and since day 1 I've always felt this was a clear oversight of the game's design, particularly on maps where the trade route is close to TC. My assumption was always that it was too difficult to implement by the game's deadline and they just never did it. Anyone have a valid argument against this?

Clearly, addressing this would affect the game's meta in some way, but make for a much better experience overall.
I know there are some mods that address this; to me the best option from a playability perspective would be to only allow long walls to be placed in a mostly perpendicular fashion over the trade route, and having any wall placed over a trade route automatically change to a gate and factor in the additional cost.
Welcome to the site, and thank you for an intriguing first post – considering which you're probably smarter than most and stand a good chance of having your ditto idea implemented into the EP. If nothing else you'll learn about ESOC, Garjuments and indeed life at large.
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 6367
ESO: Funnu
Location: Ramadanistan
  • Link to post
  • Quote

19 Oct 2016, 05:00

pecelot wrote:I've seen it working in the Improvement Mod, so it's definitely doable, but on a map like ESOC Florida it would help people wall up themselves, which I can see some being reluctant to... :hmm:
Otherwise, I'm all for that! :smile:
That's not an issue – Goodspeed shall halve wall hitpoints until they can barely stand!
sudmakmak wrote:This patch Keshik don't have buff anti cavalry = noob patch2.0
and don't have nerf hard japan = noob patch2.0
because all more noob player at this patch = noob logic.
or they maybe have boyfriend.(japanese boyfriend fuck your ass them)
Netherlands Denalin
Crossbow
 
Posts: 5
ESO: Denalin
  • Link to post
  • Quote

19 Oct 2016, 05:19

EAGLEMUT wrote:Would be better to discuss this in a new thread, since it is definitely not a bug fix.

Will do. Moving here: viewtopic.php?f=80&t=8440

EAGLEMUT wrote:Note that EP aims to make only as minimal changes to the game as possible, while maintaining a more balanced experienced than the official RE patch. For that reason I am skeptical a change of this magnitude would be accepted, but it's worth a discussion I guess.

Yup, and that's actually what makes me prefer EP over basically any other mod. I'm not looking for new civs, units, etc. just balance and fixes that ES surely would have made if they had better backing from Microsoft. At that, I'll admit that unit fixes are clearly easier to justify than this, since there is still a chance that the designers fully intended for walls to not be able to cross trade routes. Hmm, maybe I'll find an original game designer from Ensemble and shoot him an email...

pecelot wrote:I've seen it working in the Improvement Mod, so it's definitely doable, but on a map like ESOC Florida it would help people wall up themselves, which I can see some being reluctant to... :hmm:

;) to be expected.
User avatar
Poland pecelot
ESOC Community Team
 
Posts: 6328
ESO: Pezet
Location: Warsaw, Poland
  • Link to post
  • Quote

19 Oct 2016, 20:02

zoom wrote:Welcome to the site, and thank you for an intriguing first post – considering which you're probably smarter than most and stand a good chance of having your ditto idea implemented into the EP. If nothing else you'll learn about ESOC, Garjuments and indeed life at large.

Define a Garjument :hmm:

Denalin wrote:At that, I'll admit that unit fixes are clearly easier to justify than this, since there is still a chance that the designers fully intended for walls to not be able to cross trade routes. Hmm, maybe I'll find an original game designer from Ensemble and shoot him an email...

For the most part I'd just expect them to be lazy about that. It's definitely doable by regular modders, just like I mentioned — it's implemented in the Improvement Mod. Although to be fair, if I recall correctly, it works there in such a way that you can build a wall on the trade route, but it'll be destroyed by the upcoming travois/stagecoach/iron horse if you won't make a gate out of it. Perhaps MS developers thought it would be quite problematic to include in the game, so they just got rid of that idea. Historically, gaia units were not able to open gates, but only because enemy troops could walk through them then, which is not the case in AoE3 (wild animals can't cross the gate even if it's open.
In the end, it's hard to decide. If such a decision was intentional, it was probably related to in-game mechanics and possible issues emerging from that, but if it's fixable, then I'd be up for that, of course. :)
I'm not sure sending any message to anyone related with ES/MS is worth trying, as it's a pointless effort most of the time. They don't really care anymore, even when it comes to much more serious problems, like dealing with cheaters. :mad:
My Tips of the Day and COMPSTOMP threads! :flowers:
No Flag umeu
ESOC Patch Team
 
Posts: 5705
  • Link to post
  • Quote

19 Oct 2016, 22:00

Marathan Catamarans should get their attack damage type changed to siege, like every other warship.
Goodbye AoE3, good morning Vietnam!
Netherlands Denalin
Crossbow
 
Posts: 5
ESO: Denalin
  • Link to post
  • Quote

20 Oct 2016, 03:29

pecelot wrote:I'm not sure sending any message to anyone related with ES/MS is worth trying, as it's a pointless effort most of the time. They don't really care anymore, even when it comes to much more serious problems, like dealing with cheaters. :mad:


For what it's worth, I reached out to AoE3's lead designer and he responded pretty quickly. Their hands are tied when it comes to actually patching the game (funding, internal politics, etc), but many of the team were passionate creating the game, and still remain passionate. Anyway, we had a nice back and forth throughout the day on Twitter. I'll post the full conversation tomorrow on the other thread. :)

Forum Info

Return to “ESOC Patch Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest