[POLL] If China had to be nerfed...

What should be nerfed in your opinion ? (in order of priority)

1. The Chinese monk / village's fattening rate / Intervention card
3
14%
2. The Chinese monk / Intervention card / village's fattening rate
6
29%
3. Village's fattening rate / the Chinese monk / Intervention card
5
24%
4. Village's fattening rate / Intervention card / the Chinese monk
2
10%
5. Intervention card / the Chinese monk / village's fattening rate
4
19%
6. Intervention card / village's fattening rate / the Chinese monk
1
5%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
No Flag Jaeger
Jaeger
Posts: 4492
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by Jaeger »

Jerom wrote:
ovi12 wrote:
[Armag] diarouga wrote:China is going to be nerfed in the next patch.
I think you overrate china guys, we don t need to nerf them so much.

Rlly?? I think if they nerf age 3 china they should buff disciples to make it easier to age

Im not really sure how classified this information is but you shouldnt worry. Its a small and fair nerf imo.

I do think they should buff disciples to make it a little easier to age, and then they can slightly nerf age 3 as well.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
User avatar
China fei123456
Jaeger
Posts: 3285
Joined: Apr 23, 2015
ESO: fei123456
Location: Alderaan

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by fei123456 »

buff steppe riders! make the age 2 7 steppe rider card infinite! then i wont complain about nerfing their age 3.
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
Gendarme
Posts: 9314
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by zoom »

FOR CHINAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
User avatar
Brazil lemmings121
Jaeger
Posts: 2673
Joined: Mar 15, 2015
ESO: lemmings121

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by lemmings121 »

ovi12 wrote:
Jerom wrote:
Show hidden quotes

Im not really sure how classified this information is but you shouldnt worry. Its a small and fair nerf imo.

I do think they should buff disciples to make it a little easier to age, and then they can slightly nerf age 3 as well.


Oh god no, this remembers me of early tad, with disciples killing everything AND conventing into more disciples. :( :( :(
/trauma
Image
User avatar
No Flag thebritish
Jaeger
Posts: 3787
Joined: Jul 18, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by thebritish »

I think buffing disciples while being more expensive to help them age safer in age 3, but nerf their age 3 shipments, so they wont be able to annihilate every civ just because of shipments..
So, china should have between french and german type shipments i think, instead of having french+german shipments combined..
krichk wrote: For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge thebritish
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

thebritish wrote:I think buffing disciples while being more expensive to help them age safer in age 3, but nerf their age 3 shipments, so they wont be able to annihilate every civ just because of shipments..
So, china should have between french and german type shipments i think, instead of having french+german shipments combined..


shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
Palestine Mimsy for President
Jaeger
Posts: 3680
Joined: Feb 21, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by Mimsy for President »

EP Team had better consider this poll. The people have spoken !

MIMSY 2016
MAKE ESOC PATCH GREAT AGAIN
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by momuuu »

I dont understand why the option with the best change last is winning. China simply CANNOT be balanced on both livestock maps and non-livestock maps. If you nerf anything but their livestock, they're gonna be bad on non livestock maps or still too strong on livestock maps.. It is literally the only viable option to properly balance china for the current mappool.
User avatar
United States of America Darwin_
Howdah
Posts: 1446
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
Location: Boston

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by Darwin_ »

All we need to do is nerf shipments and buff eco. Problem solved.
somppukunkku wrote:This is not a fucking discogame.
User avatar
China fei123456
Jaeger
Posts: 3285
Joined: Apr 23, 2015
ESO: fei123456
Location: Alderaan

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by fei123456 »

i have to say china age 3 is strong, but this is not because of their shipments. its just their cav. meteor hammer >>>>> cuirass.
china fortress shipments are normal imo. they have 9 redcoad but india has it too, and india even has 9 sepoy (080 res) 9 zam (1080 res) and elephants, urumi...
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

Couprider wrote:i have to say china age 3 is strong, but this is not because of their shipments. its just their cav. meteor hammer >>>>> cuirass.
china fortress shipments are normal imo. they have 9 redcoad but india has it too, and india even has 9 sepoy (1200 res) 9 zam (1200 res) and elephants, urumi...


yes,India have too.
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

Darwin_ wrote:All we need to do is nerf shipments and buff eco. Problem solved.


shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
and map ui2 .can watch, china are bad eco.
User avatar
Great Britain britishmusketeer
Howdah
Posts: 1845
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by britishmusketeer »

sudmakmak wrote:
shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
and map ui2 .can watch, china are bad eco.

chinas eco is actually pretty good because you can make vills in transition(6 vill) + summer palace(5 vill) + porcelain tower(8vill) + export(5% eco boost) which combine with cost effective units to make them a strong civ. Individual games rarely tell you much about a matchup. The reason you complain about china is just because you are bad at the game. Sorry but someone had to point this out.
Palestine Mimsy for President
Jaeger
Posts: 3680
Joined: Feb 21, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by Mimsy for President »

u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
Yes you can. Ever heard of cost/effectiveness ?
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

britishmusketeer wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
and map ui2 .can watch, china are bad eco.

chinas eco is actually pretty good because you can make vills in transition(6 vill) + summer palace(5 vill) + porcelain tower(8vill) + export(5% eco boost) which combine with cost effective units to make them a strong civ. Individual games rarely tell you much about a matchup. The reason you complain about china is just because you are bad at the game. Sorry but someone had to point this out.


OMG, LOL, Ok I'm bad but H2O or other player play at tournament. They play china. They are bad. Because They lose eco with China.
transition(6 vill)??? mean??
User avatar
Great Britain britishmusketeer
Howdah
Posts: 1845
Joined: Feb 28, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by britishmusketeer »

sudmakmak wrote:
britishmusketeer wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
and map ui2 .can watch, china are bad eco.

chinas eco is actually pretty good because you can make vills in transition(6 vill) + summer palace(5 vill) + porcelain tower(8vill) + export(5% eco boost) which combine with cost effective units to make them a strong civ. Individual games rarely tell you much about a matchup. The reason you complain about china is just because you are bad at the game. Sorry but someone had to point this out.


OMG, LOL, Ok I'm bad but H2O or other player play at tournament. They play china. They are bad. Because They lose eco with China.
transition(6 vill)??? mean??

there have been hardly any china non-mirrors in the tournament and those where china lost was down to the china player not playing optimally or not as well as the opponent. By 6 vill in transition i mean since they an asain civ they can make vills while aging giving them an extra 3 vills over other civs when they age to age 2, and 3 when they age to age 3.
User avatar
No Flag thebritish
Jaeger
Posts: 3787
Joined: Jul 18, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by thebritish »

sudmakmak wrote:
britishmusketeer wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
shipment age3 china.Its ok. they are cheap units.
u can't compare cheap units (china) between expensive units (other civs)
and map ui2 .can watch, china are bad eco.

chinas eco is actually pretty good because you can make vills in transition(6 vill) + summer palace(5 vill) + porcelain tower(8vill) + export(5% eco boost) which combine with cost effective units to make them a strong civ. Individual games rarely tell you much about a matchup. The reason you complain about china is just because you are bad at the game. Sorry but someone had to point this out.


OMG, LOL, Ok I'm bad but H2O or other player play at tournament. They play china. They are bad. Because They lose eco with China.
transition(6 vill)??? mean??

I can easily beat 2 players below PR22 at once if they leave me for 2-3 minutes after i age to fortress.
-Also, by saying china is bad you confirm that you are bad in the game..
krichk wrote: For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge thebritish
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

thebritish wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
Show hidden quotes


OMG, LOL, Ok I'm bad but H2O or other player play at tournament. They play china. They are bad. Because They lose eco with China.
transition(6 vill)??? mean??

I can easily beat 2 players below PR22 at once if they leave me for 2-3 minutes after i age to fortress.
-Also, by saying china is bad you confirm that you are bad in the game..


sry. man I have high pr+ than 22
User avatar
No Flag thebritish
Jaeger
Posts: 3787
Joined: Jul 18, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by thebritish »

lets play?
-i wanna see you beat me..
krichk wrote: For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge thebritish
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

thebritish wrote:lets play?
-i wanna see you beat me..


Welcome to Voobly?
Or u will rush me?
No Flag sudmakmak
Skirmisher
Posts: 180
Joined: Jan 15, 2016

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by sudmakmak »

sudmakmak wrote:
thebritish wrote:lets play?
-i wanna see you beat me..


Welcome to Voobly?
Or u will rush me? because who how to counter china
and if they don't buff age 2 it useless. if they use logic. buff ok.
It not need who can have 2 skill.
example 1 man have more IQ but bad play football. or 1 man have skill play football but bad IQ.
User avatar
No Flag thebritish
Jaeger
Posts: 3787
Joined: Jul 18, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by thebritish »

sudmakmak wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
thebritish wrote:lets play?
-i wanna see you beat me..


Welcome to Voobly?
Or u will rush me? because who how to counter china
and if they don't buff age 2 it useless. if they use logic. buff ok.
It not need who can have 2 skill.
example 1 man have more IQ but bad play football. or 1 man have skill play football but bad IQ.

I am going to play with china because i think they are OP.
You need to beat me to prove me wrong..
krichk wrote: For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge thebritish
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

thebritish wrote:
sudmakmak wrote:
Show hidden quotes

I am going to play with china because i think they are OP.
You need to beat me to prove me wrong..

I can prove you're wrong lol.
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by momuuu »

Thebritish stop arguing by saying you're good and then challenge people to prove you wrong. Im pretty sure I could prove you wrong in any match up really, so lets do a BO144.
No Flag deleted_user
Ninja
Posts: 14364
Joined: Mar 26, 2015

Re: If China had to be nerfed...

Post by deleted_user »

Play every possible match up! 14 choose 2 I believe = 91 games. BO 91. Do it.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV