New Team map set

What map would you like to see in the team map set?

Adirondacks
11
4%
Arizona
14
5%
Arkansas
13
4%
Baja California
8
3%
Bengal
9
3%
Cascade Range
5
2%
Colorado
8
3%
High Plains
11
4%
Hudson Bay
11
4%
Kamchatka
11
4%
Klondike
4
1%
Indonesia
3
1%
Manchac
10
3%
Mendocino
14
5%
Pampas Sierras
10
3%
Tassili
6
2%
Texas
6
2%
Tibet
3
1%
Andes
9
3%
Araucania
2
1%
Bayou
3
1%
Borneo
2
1%
California
7
2%
Deccan
5
2%
Yellow River
5
2%
Great Plains
6
2%
Great lakes
4
1%
Himalayas
8
3%
Himalayas Upper
8
3%
Hispaniola
5
2%
Mongolia
10
3%
New England
8
3%
Ozark
5
2%
Painted Desert
6
2%
Pampa
4
1%
Patagonia
7
2%
Silk Road
6
2%
Saguenay
5
2%
Siberia
11
4%
Sonora
7
2%
 
Total votes: 290

France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: New Team map set

Post by iNcog »

This discussion is mostly about whether or not you want standard maps which play out mostly the same (with same balance for all civs) or whether you want map diversity which will favor and unfavor some civs outright.
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote: ā†‘
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 12710
Joined: Feb 26, 2015
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

Re: New Team map set

Post by [Armag] diarouga »

Yes, also I think we should put sag and gp back, because they are great maps and Hudson/High Plains are different.
France iNcog
Ninja
Posts: 13236
Joined: Mar 7, 2015

Re: New Team map set

Post by iNcog »

They should only be put back if they are re-makes from the map team. Otherwise they're just too damn inconsistent.

It's easier to re-make a map than it is to fix it.
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/incog_aoe
Garja wrote: ā†‘
20 Mar 2020, 21:46
I just hope DE is not going to implement all of the EP changes. Right now it is a big clusterfuck.
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
Gendarme
Posts: 9314
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

Re: New Team map set

Post by zoom »

[Armag] diarouga wrote:Yes, also I think we should put sag and gp back, because they are great maps and Hudson/High Plains are different.

Saguenay is usually good in terms of resources, but it has that damn random building.

Great Plains is atrocious. You wouldn't like that, I'm sure.
User avatar
United States of America Papist
Retired Contributor
Donator 03
Posts: 2602
Joined: Mar 29, 2015
ESO: Papist

Re: New Team map set

Post by Papist »

Just make a new map set named "Trollolololol" and put Deccan, Texas, Ceylon, Indochina, and Tibet in there.
The function of man is to live, not to exist.
Netherlands momuuu
Ninja
Posts: 14237
Joined: Jun 7, 2015
ESO: Jerom_

Re: New Team map set

Post by momuuu »

I don't know why people always complain about the team maps so much and almost act as if RE maps are better. I mean, RE great plains, the most played map almost in team games, is honestly absolutely atrocious. Tibia said something about the maps not having any/much berries, and that he thinks there should be more berries on teammaps. Maybe thats worth considering.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?

All-time

Active last two weeks

Active last month

Supremacy

Treaty

Official

ESOC Patch

Treaty Patch

1v1 Elo

2v2 Elo

3v3 Elo

Power Rating

Which streams do you wish to see listed?

Twitch

Age of Empires III

Age of Empires IV