Dsy wrote:Im inactive but im up to play german vs spain sometime. I play german you spain. Ok Kaiser?
Sounds like a fair match-up.
Dsy wrote:Im inactive but im up to play german vs spain sometime. I play german you spain. Ok Kaiser?
Dsy wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Lol if you want but it's not going to be relevant unless you are pr 35 ish ?
Its relevant cause civ difference gives huge advantage. I can lose only if i make big mistakes...
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Jerom wrote:Oh I think I misinterpreted the scale so I made it truly go to ten. Well germany and france are really OP compared to iro or iro has to be UP.
Germany 10
France 9.5
Aztec 8.5
China 8.5
British 8
Portuguese 7
Japan 7
India 6.5
Spain 6
Dutch 4
Russia 4
Sioux 4
Iro 3
Otto undefined
Kaiserklein wrote:Lol if you want but it's not going to be relevant unless you are pr 35 ish ?
Hazza54321 wrote:Jerom wrote:Oh I think I misinterpreted the scale so I made it truly go to ten. Well germany and france are really OP compared to iro or iro has to be UP.
Germany 10
France 9.5
Aztec 8.5
China 8.5
British 8
Portuguese 7
Japan 7
India 6.5
Spain 6
Dutch 4
Russia 4
Sioux 4
Iro 3
Otto undefined
i mostly agree with this, perhaps ports higher than brits
Hazza54321 wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Lol if you want but it's not going to be relevant unless you are pr 35 ish ?
ive beaten you, and im pr30
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Hazza54321 wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Lol if you want but it's not going to be relevant unless you are pr 35 ish ?
ive beaten you, and im pr30
Kaiserklein wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Lol if you want but it's not going to be relevant unless you are pr 35 ish ?
ive beaten you, and im pr30
So what ? You can't judge a MU based on a game between different level players
Hazza54321 wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Show hidden quotes
So what ? You can't judge a MU based on a game between different level players
so hostile
breeze pleasedeleted_user wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:Show hidden quotes
so hostile
Ofc.. if you lame with strelets nothing to respect x)
somppukunkku wrote:This is not a fucking discogame.
Mr_Bramboy wrote:Anyone who rates Dutch and Sioux higher than a 3 has never played them.
Darwin_ wrote:Chinese: 10
German: 9
French: 8
Aztec: 8
Japanese: 8
Portuguese: 7
Brits: 7
Dutch: 6
Indians: 6
Spain: 6
Russia: 6
Otto: 6
Sioux: 6
Iro: 6
I would say that every civ should be an 7-8. That is what the average should be, IMO.
Goodspeed wrote:I love how the average is within .05 of the last poll's. 6.46, now 6.43
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Yes, I think people don't vote for the best civ but for the civ they would want to be nerfed.
Jokes on them, this poll won't be used to base balance changes on.[Armag] diarouga wrote:Yes, I think people don't vote for the best civ but for the civ they would want to be nerfed.
Goodspeed wrote:Jokes on them, this poll won't be used to base balance changes on.[Armag] diarouga wrote:Yes, I think people don't vote for the best civ but for the civ they would want to be nerfed.
But still can we stop with the BS answers? Just had to remove like 10 responses from some retard who single handedly got China in 5th by voting 1 for them and 6+ for everything else.
Dsy wrote:Lancer doesnt work vs a good otto player. German destroy you. Azzi play second age? wtf. French destroy you.
And if you dont scout rush dont complain you lose your tps. If dont scout a rush you can even lose a game. Its a huge mistake.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?