ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
They were no iro. I don't really know when they'd have truly been an optimal pick.
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Garja wrote:They have already a specific travois politician that scales with age.
+100w at start and 700f 700w 700g is another option.
I think 700 crates could be fine, but +100w seems like it would make them like re iro on a 200w start and ep iro on a 100w start.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Nerf a little bit :
- Port : 90 food vills
- Dutch : Just let 350f 300w bank + XP bank boost but remove other changes.
- Russia : I don't know to
- TPs : Decrease slightly the amount of XP that gives TPs (-10% ?)
- Iro : Try to reset Iro as RE state, it should be ok on esoc maps.
- China : Old Han to -25% (-50% is just too much)
- Sioux : Idk how to
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Honestly, I'd go for 85f port vills maybe, leave dutch and russia the same and buff iro/sioux and maybe do that old han thing and then just leave it be. The balance is pretty awesome tbh, if india is one of the weakest civ then every civ feels pretty strong (except iro/sioux).
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
edeholland wrote:To be honest I'm more interested what the top 32 (tourney players) think of this, maybe we can also have some kind of internal poll?
Hai, i think Is very good i like it alot .
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 2549
- Joined: Jun 28, 2015
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
I think at this point we shouldnt be nerfing civs anymore. Altho port might be to strong i would just leave them as they are for now. I really dislike the approach of cheaper vills for ports tho, id much rather see a cassa cost decrease or sth along those lines, or ports getting more food crates than other civs idk i feel like pretty much anything is better than cheaper vills, but maybe its better to not touch them for now as theyre still fine i think. Very strong indeed but not OP probably. The only thing I would touch is the ATP card. Thanks to 4 and 5 tp maps this card is just OP. Either get rid of high tp map, as i have been proposing for an eternity now ....... or nerf the card somehow ( remove attack from trading posts decrease hitpoints to 3 k, maybe increase the discount on tps to compensate for the nerf ). Instead focus on getting the civs that are below average on the same level as the other ones. It might be even wise to remove pervious nerfs such a the HP buff to uhlans.
It would also be clever if we actually could have more update cycles of the EP inbetween tourneys. Right now it kinda feels like this: Balance Changes.....Tourney.....balance changes......tourney. While I agreee that the best intel on the stafe of balance are tourneys. They are can also give you the wrong idea of balance because euro civs are always overrepresented and other civs therefore vastly underrepresented. Counter civ picking rules might give you a wrong idea of the civs strength. If someone wins with brits against port, you might think port is fine whereas if you see ports playing vs germany you might think port is OP
In any case increasing the update cycles between tourneys would smart. Like only buffs in one update only nerfs in second ( if sth turns out to be awfully wrong )
It would also be clever if we actually could have more update cycles of the EP inbetween tourneys. Right now it kinda feels like this: Balance Changes.....Tourney.....balance changes......tourney. While I agreee that the best intel on the stafe of balance are tourneys. They are can also give you the wrong idea of balance because euro civs are always overrepresented and other civs therefore vastly underrepresented. Counter civ picking rules might give you a wrong idea of the civs strength. If someone wins with brits against port, you might think port is fine whereas if you see ports playing vs germany you might think port is OP
In any case increasing the update cycles between tourneys would smart. Like only buffs in one update only nerfs in second ( if sth turns out to be awfully wrong )
breeze wrote: they cant even guess how much f***ing piece of stupid retarded they look they are trying to give lesson to people who are over pr35 and know the best mu. im pretty sure that we need a page that only pr30+ post and then we could have a nice discussins.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
I'd like to see:
Port: 90f vills
India: 100w houses, 90w vills
Aztec: Nobles hut moved to age II
I'd also like to see a few new maps but also removing (retiring from tournaments) some of the old ones.
Port: 90f vills
India: 100w houses, 90w vills
Aztec: Nobles hut moved to age II
I'd also like to see a few new maps but also removing (retiring from tournaments) some of the old ones.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
The lengths to which you go...Jerom wrote:Well I at least backed up my opinion by civ choices in the tournament. Although I should have played dutch more, I backed up my opinion that theyre not that strong by not picking them in the most important bo5 I played.
I mean, Im willing to discuss how dutch is not top 2 and how they are just fine. At this point in time Ive concluded that people that think that just havent played the civ enough or sth.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
zoom wrote:The lengths to which you go...Jerom wrote:Well I at least backed up my opinion by civ choices in the tournament. Although I should have played dutch more, I backed up my opinion that theyre not that strong by not picking them in the most important bo5 I played.
I mean, Im willing to discuss how dutch is not top 2 and how they are just fine. At this point in time Ive concluded that people that think that just havent played the civ enough or sth.
You're right, its amazing that I even care enough to make a single post pointing out how the perception of balance when it comes to dutch is extremely often extremely wrong.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Yes, you made a classic Goodspeed® reply, addressing his remarks on Iroquois and Sioux while disregarding his general point; the balancing theory of incentivizing play by buffing. Just look at Russians with a "20 Strelets" shipment – clearly unbeatable!Goodspeed wrote:Well his comment was about the approach we chose, when really we haven't chosen any. Rather we delayed dealing with the civ.zoom wrote:It's perfectly possible you didn't miss his point, but you seem not to have addressed ignored it in your post.Show hidden quotes
While the idea of buffing rather than nerfing when the outliers are clearly on the #stronk side is illogical, this particular thought is worthwhile, I tink. Just be sure not to make Iroquois too powerful, or once more no one will play them...
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Dankl wrote:I'd like to see:
Port: 90f vills
India: 100w houses, 90w vills
Aztec: Nobles hut moved to age II
I'd also like to see a few new maps but also removing (retiring from tournaments) some of the old ones.
why would aztecs need a nobles hut in age2?!
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
85!? Are you mad??Jerom wrote:Honestly, I'd go for 85f port vills maybe, leave dutch and russia the same and buff iro/sioux and maybe do that old han thing and then just leave it be. The balance is pretty awesome tbh, if india is one of the weakest civ then every civ feels pretty strong (except iro/sioux).
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Evidentlyzoom wrote:85!? Are you mad??Jerom wrote:Honestly, I'd go for 85f port vills maybe, leave dutch and russia the same and buff iro/sioux and maybe do that old han thing and then just leave it be. The balance is pretty awesome tbh, if india is one of the weakest civ then every civ feels pretty strong (except iro/sioux).
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Rikikipu wrote:Iro : Try to reset Iro as RE state, it should be ok on esoc maps.
????????????????????????????????????????????????
- KINGofOsmane
- Pro Player
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Feb 24, 2015
- ESO: KINGofOsmane
- Location: Walling Town
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Diarouga wrote:Rikikipu wrote:Iro : Try to reset Iro as RE state, it should be ok on esoc maps.
????????????????????????????????????????????????
lul
"Losing to Callen was the worst night of my life" Gibthedurrty 2019
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
"If hazza can get pr42 with team i can get pr50 with 1v1" Gibthedurrty 2018
Tete cs:go experienceLecastete wrote: Dude i hate this game. I am bad and i also dont have luck
- lemmings121
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Mar 15, 2015
- ESO: lemmings121
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
about iro, i'm not convinced thay the are ultimate trash atm.
look at my game vs deadrising iro, (game3) he made a fairly decent iro push.
4 kanya + 5 toma are stronger and arrive earlier then 5 cossac 5 musks, while the latter one is considered op. (russia might be able to keep constant pressure better, but we all know how insane iros infantary can get).
they arent top tier, but arent that bad. all we need is h20 playing a few games with then on stream and i'm sure everyone will start doing it too. lol
look at my game vs deadrising iro, (game3) he made a fairly decent iro push.
4 kanya + 5 toma are stronger and arrive earlier then 5 cossac 5 musks, while the latter one is considered op. (russia might be able to keep constant pressure better, but we all know how insane iros infantary can get).
they arent top tier, but arent that bad. all we need is h20 playing a few games with then on stream and i'm sure everyone will start doing it too. lol
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Iros are for sure better than Sioux, dunno what people are smoking lol. They are more or less on the same strenght of current French in 1v1. Slightly less eco and better cards + abusive mechanics.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Diarouga wrote:Rikikipu wrote:Iro : Try to reset Iro as RE state, it should be ok on esoc maps.
????????????????????????????????????????????????
This is why we love you diarouga, being so humble
-
- Ninja
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Apr 28, 2020
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
ye reset iro, it will probs be too strong, but will be better to recheck from there whats needed to balance.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Rikikipu wrote:Diarouga wrote:Rikikipu wrote:Iro : Try to reset Iro as RE state, it should be ok on esoc maps.
????????????????????????????????????????????????
This is why we love you diarouga, being so humble
You're too good at this game.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Zzz see I'm not agressive and you just flame for free and then you complain. Makes no sense.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
Rikikipu wrote:Zzz see I'm not agressive and you just flame for free and then you complain. Makes no sense.
Since when is "?" a flame?
-
- Pro Player
- Posts: 2549
- Joined: Jun 28, 2015
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
umeu wrote:ye reset iro, it will probs be too strong, but will be better to recheck from there whats needed to balance.
as long as we do it before the next tourney start. I fear tho that it will go the usual way.
breeze wrote: they cant even guess how much f***ing piece of stupid retarded they look they are trying to give lesson to people who are over pr35 and know the best mu. im pretty sure that we need a page that only pr30+ post and then we could have a nice discussins.
Re: ESOC patch balance poll #4 (1v1)
umeu wrote:ye reset iro, it will probs be too strong, but will be better to recheck from there whats needed to balance.
Yeah thats what I was saying too. Or you could reset the crates and go with the slight military nerfs instead (its other way around right now).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests