Lindaawilsoon wrote:The new American FFC laws allows ISPs to slow down or speed up the delivery of certain websites, hence allowing telecom organizations to charge extra free for providing high quality streaming services. Labelled as the “micromanaging of the internet”, users must look for a solution to explore the internet freely.
This is where Net Neutrality VPN come in, making it possible for users to bypass geo-restrictions and data limitations, hence getting rid of privacy regulations. It is the ultimate way to defend free speech, and get rid of internet control. Continue reading this blog for more information.
At first I thought this video Bram posted was made by someone trying to ridicule Ajit. Then I found out it's real and not even the first of its kind. The guy is literally a troll.
momuuu wrote: ↑theres no way eaglemut is truly a top player
milku3459 wrote:80% of the will of the american people? Where'd you get that number from
Well, its actueally 83% according to a recently survey by University of Maryland.
The survey by the university's Program for Public Consultation and Voice of the People, a nonpartisan polling organization, concluded that 83 percent of Americans do not approve of the FCC proposal. Just 16 percent said they approved.
On the eve of a pivotal vote that would deregulate the broadband industry, a fresh survey from the University of Maryland shows that large majorities of Americans — including 3 out of 4 Republicans — oppose the government's plan to repeal its net neutrality rules for Internet providers.
XeeleeFlower wrote:I know that a few of you all have read the book "1984". Those of you who haven't, I strongly encourage you to give it a read.
well, that dystopia is still far from happening except for North Korea and Eritrea where similarities can be found if you want. If anything, it shows how bad we are at predicting the future
XeeleeFlower wrote:I know that a few of you all have read the book "1984". Those of you who haven't, I strongly encourage you to give it a read.
well, that dystopia is still far from happening except for North Korea and Eritrea where similarities can be found if you want. If anything, it shows how bad we are at predicting the future
Or maybe the future didn't happen because we predicted it and avoided it.
XeeleeFlower wrote:I know that a few of you all have read the book "1984". Those of you who haven't, I strongly encourage you to give it a read.
well, that dystopia is still far from happening except for North Korea and Eritrea where similarities can be found if you want. If anything, it shows how bad we are at predicting the future
Or maybe the future didn't happen because we predicted it and avoided it.
XeeleeFlower wrote:I know that a few of you all have read the book "1984". Those of you who haven't, I strongly encourage you to give it a read.
well, that dystopia is still far from happening except for North Korea and Eritrea where similarities can be found if you want. If anything, it shows how bad we are at predicting the future
Or maybe the future didn't happen because we predicted it and avoided it.
Or maybe this isn't the future.
To Orwell's defense: He was not a scientist but a writer first and journalist second. So of course his prediction or rather scenario was based on a warped status quo with a surreal rate of growth and radical changes, always having a dramaturgy and sales in mind. Also, predicting the future of a society, even a small part of it, is not reliable and much rather impossible even based on science. It's a living organism, as soon as you describe a status quo, it's already not accurate anymore - if it was to begin with