Americans just don't understand what it's like to go and watch your league 2 side, with only 5,000 people in the terraces each week, for decades with the hope that your small side can one day make into the premier league and play on a global platform. European football is less about watching excelle .....

Mr_Bramboy wrote:I would like to link a previous post of mine.

viewtopic.php?f=982&t=22645&p=530013#p530013

princeofcarthage wrote:But that's the thing though. Super league isn't much different that what currently exists except that it doesn't fall under unified governing agency. Take Europa cup for ex. It is also a closed a competition limited to only European clubs. Asian or American clubs can never par .....

You have to try new things @Kaiserklein . Nobody is saying we can't use these rules for one tournament, gain the viewership from it, then go to a different system.

Again I disagree with the rules as they are, I'd rather have a draft where you have to play 9 possible civs in a bo5 than this, but agai .....

TheNameDaniel wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

Show hidden quotes

TheNameDaniel wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

don_artie wrote:I think having at least some sort of civ rules is always great, I don't wanna see someone play their best civ over and over, I like the rule of being able to win with something just once in a seri .....

TheNameDaniel wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

don_artie wrote:I think having at least some sort of civ rules is always great, I don't wanna see someone play their best civ over and over, I like the rule of being able to win with something just once in a series. But I also think it's cool to see people on their .....

don_artie wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

Show hidden quotes

don_artie wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

don_artie wrote:I think having at least some sort of civ rules is always great, I don't wanna see someone play their best civ over and over, I like the rule of being able to win with something just once in a series. But .....

don_artie wrote:

Riotcoke wrote:

don_artie wrote:I think having at least some sort of civ rules is always great, I don't wanna see someone play their best civ over and over, I like the rule of being able to win with something just once in a series. But I also think it's cool to see people on their bes .....

don_artie wrote:I think having at least some sort of civ rules is always great, I don't wanna see someone play their best civ over and over, I like the rule of being able to win with something just once in a series. But I also think it's cool to see people on their best civs, not on their meh civ be .....

It's only flawed if your crutch is a few civs, if you're a top player you should be able to play all civs to a high standard.

Like it's so interesting seeing GUA play brit 3x in a row in a BO5 vs a better player as it's one of three civs he plays, or it's so fun seeing Kynesie play Port or Japan at l .....

comradecommissar wrote:

Mitoe wrote:Surprised no one is talking about the information in the virtual village on ageofempires.com yet.

I think most people are just digesting the USA civ right now.

TELL ME YOU WENT TO THE COMMUNITY COUNCIL?

I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I just wonder how many american only smurfs will grace the ladder so that peoples can protect their elo from the early stage of figuring out the civ

Here's the shit argentina pumps out about this shit.

Jotunir wrote:

princeofcarthage wrote:You need a history lesson. There is no "giving back". Islands were never Argentine except for short period of time during 1816-1833 when islands were left uninhabited by Europeans but they never gave up territorial claims. Referendum also overwhelmingly .....