hmm, i can say with a reasonable level of confidence that achieving pr35 solo'ing china isn't as much of a cinch as people make it out to be.

the reason i'm not posting is because the posts aren't all that fun to write - the reason i'm not playing is because, as simply with the ebb and flow of thing .....

Reminder to those of you who have not submitted to me your selection of maps yet - you have until sign ups close on Friday the 18th at 23:59 GMT to submit. If you fail to send your civs by that time, the admin team will have fun choosing your maps for you, and you won't get the chance to change the .....

chris1089 wrote:How?

TheNameDaniel wrote:sheckler 14th lets go!

Also by what date do we have to submit our maps by?

aligator92 wrote:So Kaiser is already a Top16 player 1 week before the seeding is done? Disgusting admin favouritism

giveuanxiety wrote:When will seeding be done? Seeding is according to elo right? How much longer can we try to climb before they do the seeds?

Goodspeed wrote:Accelerate to what exactly?

SoldieR wrote:I am having issues signing up, message states:
An error has occured while retrieving your rating.

Riotcoke wrote:

Cometk wrote:

Show hidden quotes

Riotcoke wrote:

n0el wrote:i for one would love to see skirmisher play china in every game if he wants too, and people counter pick him if they want to.

if you don't play only Brit or Russia, you're fucked.

china has a 100% winrate in every other matchup?

No .....

[Armag] diarouga wrote:

Cometk wrote:if someone put up the money for a GP-only tournament i don't think there's anything competitively wrong with that? maybe viewers wouldn't find it entertaining but w/e, there's nothing inherently wrong with the rules

a player should evolve to suit the parameters .....

Riotcoke wrote:

n0el wrote:i for one would love to see skirmisher play china in every game if he wants too, and people counter pick him if they want to.

if you don't play only Brit or Russia, you're fucked.

if someone put up the money for a GP-only tournament i don't think there's anything competitively wrong with that? maybe viewers wouldn't find it entertaining but w/e, there's nothing inherently wrong with the rules

a player should evolve to suit the parameters of the competition, that's what it mean .....

Lukas_L99 wrote:

Good ol Ivan wrote:If you don't immediately think of the French female villager your gay.

Never understand the hype around that voice, she sounds so old.

[Armag] diarouga wrote:

Cometk wrote:imagine administering all the disputes

Then that's a good idea in theory but not in practice. Counterpicking with no civ restriction feels shit lol.

the "mirror meta" concern is only valid if u remove civ rules entirely (ie. no more counter picks - players have to agree on a MU for every game in a series)

honestly why entertain that idea to its logical extreme? the more metered option is to remove civilization restrictions, but maintain .....