Once a civilization or map has been selected in the draft, it is no longer available to be chosen by the other player. does this mean what I think it means? no overlap in civ pools? that seems insane, I feel like that has never been done before. Well this civ rule is gonna fuck over a lot of people...

It seems that counterpicking is too strong. You can have a civ that's good in 90% of matchups but one bad matchup and you can't choose it as your main civ in tourneys. Brit is always voted as a top civ but in nearly every tourney game I watch it loses to Russia. Instead of no counterpicking I belie...

It seems that counterpicking is too strong. You can have a civ that's good in 90% of matchups but one bad matchup and you can't choose it as your main civ in tourneys. Brit is always voted as a top civ but in nearly every tourney game I watch it loses to Russia. Instead of no counterpicking I believ...

Normal TPs don't generate the same amount of XP per TP on every map, it depends heavily on the number of total TPs available. Maybe do the same for native trickle? It's cool to build one native TP, it's cancer to send ATP and spam 4 native TPs.

Raphael, I think you might only be looking at somewhat early uses of the fort. Except for specific strats, the most general usage of a fort is to secure the last hunts and mines on the map near the end of the game. If you can do that, the fort is arguably the single most effective shipment at that ...

Actually no. This is pretty consistent with leagues in all the games. The difference is just more glaring cuz 1) Team pool is small, 2) Difference between 5th and 6th spot is huge. Take football for game difference between RM, Barca and bottom teams. There is always chance to outplay but rare. Imag...

Real talk, suggestions for league @admins: 1. Teams should be forced to rest their champion against SKG. Nobody knew that Hazza and Somppu were gonna ragequit. This would give SKG more of a chance and make it more fair to teams that already played SKG. 2. Playoffs should be top 4 teams in knockout, ...

So this league is solely about who can milk SKG the hardest? Seems lame.

Mitoe wrote:

Mr_Bramboy wrote:Pathetic.

Man why would you say this? How can you possibly represent the staff so unprofessionally and disrespectfully?

@Mitoe the OP was edited, before it was a troll apology copy-pasta from SirMusket. That's what @Mr_Bramboy was commenting on.

ty for resigning @deleted_user2

loooool

You know what would be a cool rule? If any player could sign up, even if you didn't sign up for the original. BUT, the worst teams get priority at drafting free agents. So if [mention]u1121[/mention] decides to sign up, SKG would get first dibs. Would be extremely entertaining for viewers to see th...

You know what would be a cool rule? If any player could sign up, even if you didn't sign up for the original. BUT, the worst teams get priority at drafting free agents. So if [mention]u1121[/mention] decides to sign up, SKG would get first dibs. Would be extremely entertaining for viewers to see the...

I was fully on the "wtf is @zoom doing" train, but after reading 100 threads of complaining I'm on the "top players are asshats" train now.

What is wrong with you people @Hazza54321 @Diarouga. Pretty sure everyone was crying that mahouts got nerfed and sowars were too weak. Then they get buffed and then everyone starts crying AGAIN.

Post SKG vs BIGs prediction you coward.

Maybe you just aren't playing India the right way. H2O_ and LordRaphael were very OP with India using gurkha/zambs, and those strats haven't been nerfed at all. Can more experienced players tell me how good India is with skirm/goon comp instead of sepoy comp? "Maybe you aren't playing India th...

Maybe you just aren't playing India the right way. H2O_ and LordRaphael were very OP with India using gurkha/zambs, and those strats haven't been nerfed at all. Can more experienced players tell me how good India is with skirm/goon comp instead of sepoy comp?

Wow you really can't say anything sarcastic on the Internet huh

"dozens of shipments" lol. It's like 5 fortress unit shipments or so. Do I have to explain why reducing the amount of uhlans (or units) is logical since the problem was germany having too many units? Alternatives like xp penalty and uhlan hp are definitely weirder. And how isn't it easier...

I'm looking at the previous balance poll and wtf is the logic for deciding which civs get buffed and which civs get nerfed? Brits were polled as the #1 civ and received FOUR buffs and ZERO nerfs. Fortress Age councils and politicians (not wonders), except for "The Exiled Prince" and "...

IN

Despite current incentive to playtest, with accessibility and significance both at literal peaks, even the numerous top players who are positive, appear unwilling to playtest. It's been the case for years, now. Although mildly disappointing – after all, disappointment prerequisites expectation – an...

Kawapasaka wrote:

charlemango wrote:Just wondering, is it possible to implement a random civ choice for players? I know AIs have "Random Personality" option. Imagine the awesome series we could have with random matchups.

Did you watch the GUA sub tour?

Yeah I did, the anticipation of the civs was the best part tbh