jesus3 wrote:kool_omt

ok ok look_tom

Dark cloud

somppukunkku wrote:800 crates >>>>> 600g from every perspective atm

fyi "Crates of 400 Food, 200 Wood, and 200 Coin" shipment changed to 300f, 300w, 200c

Same time?

I don't know why we deserve Eaglemut

@Pikilic @[Armag] diarouga pm me

Can you guys pin this BO in the iro section? http://eso-community.net/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=13279&p=281134 bump, there is still nothing for Iroquois on the Strategy Wall (except for Goodspeed's guide section) There is this m Not irrelevant: is there anybody interested in being a strategy boa...

Can you guys pin this BO in the iro section? http://eso-community.net/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=13279&p=281134 bump, there is still nothing for Iroquois on the Strategy Wall (except for Goodspeed's guide section) Yes the comment was before I come in staff team. Now I have something here m Yeah b...

Do you all agree on Sunday the 17th at 14:00 GMT?

tabben wrote:esoc needs an oos function for derailed threads

it had, its name was hleung

https://liquipedia.net/counterstrike/SK_Gaming copyrights?

gibson wrote:Posting a clip that you clipped of yourself that isnt funny and has terrible music playing. Nice

Imagine he liked his own posts

Sorry to interrupt. Do you think the BO is worth to be featured on the Strategy Wall?

Best clickbait of 2019

[Armag] diarouga wrote:

BrookG wrote:

[Armag] diarouga wrote:Interhectuib begging for views on his youtube channel lol.

This is a vid from MCJim's channel

Smart.

True, it's subtle advertising. Expecting people to see related videos to his channel

[Armag] diarouga wrote:Interhectuib begging for views on his youtube channel lol.

This is a vid from MCJim's channel

You are jealous because his review on my suggestion was godly

Fairly this discussion has happened before, but not on its own rather in-between discussing cheating, bugs, and others here, here and here.

Alt+d is not a cheat necessarily, but having it brings more trouble than we need. I cannot think of a reason to allow it in a tournament situation. Are the arguments for it, strong enough to diminish the strength those against it? Reviving explorer isn't only about taking a tp or stealing a treasure...

Your list of points cannot determine the truth of "alt-d is a cheat". It can determine the truth of "banning alt-d in tournaments is prefered for practical reasons". Let's not stick on semantics. nomenclature is of little significance. Name it a bug, name it a feature, name it a...

How are they not arguments? Don't pull out the "this is not an argument" card every time you disagree I don't mind an alt-d ban, but your arguments don't argue anything. It's a list of facts. You either need to expand on them and show the logic because you're not presenting an actual case...

1) Water gives an advantage to some civs Yes some civs have stronger water potential, but it means you have to invest on it (cards, time, resources) 2) Water doesn't always have a drawback It has, unless you turtle properly, don't have warships, outposts, TCs, protecting it. 3) Water is relatively ...

You are in a logical fallacy here. Certain explorers are by design more special than others, therefore it's useful for the player to get rid of them. It is an important unit and you can revive them with a price; that may be 100c ransom, waiting to reach 100hp, dance in firepit. Alt+d equals no price...

How are they not arguments? Don't pull out the "this is not an argument" card every time you disagree

1) Advantages only for certain types of explorers (Warchiefs and monks are overall more special than european explorers) 2) The experience points earned aren't a given situation, therefore the drawback isn't present at all times 3) It is easily executable, considering it's vague whether it's intent...