ESOCommunity

Can't we just do a different version for the team spawn, if it's a problem?

hunts on adirondicks are complete shite. occurance, 90% of the time.

Ok, will take note. Hazza lost a game and blamed hunts. Done!

Garja takes personal offence when someone critics his maps and refuses to change for the better because hes a stubborn idiot. Check!

check

Is it normal we can make a dock on herald island ? vills able to build a dock at the foot of the climb ?

Yes, same on the cluffs of other water maps. You can't probably domthat on Adirondacks.

Ok fair enough

That's an EP dock, alright!

Can do the same on RE. It's not a map issue, it's just game mechanic issue. It's true map can have solutions to prevent that (see Adirondacks).

Ironic thing zoom makes EP trolls EP

(talking about team)
can we actually remove the cliffs from mendicono type of maps and make tc's closer? because eventhough they are great 1v1 maps, these map dont fit well for competitive teamgame

all RE maps have separated TCs. Ozarks is similar to Mendocino in layout and has that same TC placement I think. But even maps like Saguneay have split TCs. I don't know what it should now be considered a problem.

Garja wrote:all RE maps have separated TCs. Ozarks is similar to Mendocino in layout and has that same TC placement I think. But even maps like Saguneay have split TCs. I don't know what it should now be considered a problem.

ozark wasn't standard map, talking about standard maps. sure we can have maps like klondike/thar dessert. but having seperated tcs or random cliffs on standard maps shouldnt happen, and I think most of the teamplayers agree with me about this issue.

@deleted_user5 is it fine if we remove Mendocino from Team set? I can totally understand that cliffs cause major balance issues but since it's a big part of the map, I think it would just make sense to remove it

Rikikipu wrote:@deleted_user5 is it fine if we remove Mendocino from Team set? I can totally understand that cliffs cause major balance issues but since it's a big part of the map, I think it would just make sense to remove it

if that is the only way, then yeah

deleted_user wrote:

Garja wrote:all RE maps have separated TCs. Ozarks is similar to Mendocino in layout and has that same TC placement I think. But even maps like Saguneay have split TCs. I don't know what it should now be considered a problem.

ozark wasn't standard map, talking about standard maps. sure we can have maps like klondike/thar dessert. but having seperated tcs or random cliffs on standard maps shouldnt happen, and I think most of the teamplayers agree with me about this issue.

Ozarks was used in team games on RE as it has a pretty standard layout and the hunt problem is not as bad as in 1v1.
Also Idk what you're talking about cliffs etc. Upper himalaya has shit tons of cliffs AND split TCs. And it was hardly requested in team map pool.
Your arguments just make no sense.

Well people just get more exigeant on EP, which is understandable. But it's true lots of RE maps have weird tc placements, definitely weirder than EP ones. Like sag, yukon and yucatan, among others.

Weird TC placements on RE maps is mostly because TC has about 10 tiles variance on RE. Sometimes it spawn next to nat post or trade route, etc. On EP TCs have fixed spawns.

Nah I mean on sag 3v3 one player is alone. Same on yucatan. And on yukon your tc is 2 screens away from your opponent's (like on sag too). Regardless of the variance

Garja wrote:

deleted_user wrote:

Garja wrote:all RE maps have separated TCs. Ozarks is similar to Mendocino in layout and has that same TC placement I think. But even maps like Saguneay have split TCs. I don't know what it should now be considered a problem.

ozark wasn't standard map, talking about standard maps. sure we can have maps like klondike/thar dessert. but having seperated tcs or random cliffs on standard maps shouldnt happen, and I think most of the teamplayers agree with me about this issue.

Ozarks was used in team games on RE as it has a pretty standard layout and the hunt problem is not as bad as in 1v1.
Also Idk what you're talking about cliffs etc. Upper himalaya has shit tons of cliffs AND split TCs. And it was hardly requested in team map pool.
Your arguments just make no sense.

Not really. on ozarks you hardly would get a 2nd hunt and with very little chance you could get a 3rd one, himalayas is a map which i consider to be good, now you are bringing these here and defend the problems of baja/mendocino.
also, do you want us to play RE or what? I try to explain problems in a constructive way. mendocino/arizona are unplayable for team, and please bring the old baja right now

also out of bias, can make a poll about how many people want to see old baja back, if you want

enjoy2play wrote:2v2 mendocino:

pls fix starting tc placements, this is just hilarious

my mate tc is more far then my opponent tc.

its just such a good map, pls fix this and its the best map ever

@enjoy2play @deleted_user5 it's fixed and will be part of the next EP update

flontier wrote:Is it normal we can make a dock on herald island ? vills able to build a dock at the foot of the climb ?

@flontier it's fixed and will be part of the next EP update too.

If other people want some fixes on some maps I made, it's the moment to reach me.

Is it possible to have the shape of my penis in manchac swamps?

That's not yours in Jebel Musa @Kaiserklein ?