Hazza54321 wrote:(bear in mind im mostly talking about teamgames but some refers to 1v1 also) a civ thats relied on a musk type unit as their main force, and it gets nerfed. Both of ottos core units in age 2 were nerfed (nerfing arguably ottos only skillful thing of jan abus micro) , also with the jan combat buff + 2 range abus and 500w tcs and better mosque it just promotes otto as a age 3 or age 4 civ. Jans are the backbone of ottos army and yet they feel so weak, sure you come with the argument that theyre cheaper but if you claim theyre similar in strength to their cost then you wouldnt have a problem reverting back to RE jans
How is the Janissary nerfed, though? By all accounts, other than the first Colonial Age push, it should be buffed.
To me, additional options to a Janissary-based all-in being more viable is a good thing.
Actually, you might! Because ā like I mentioned in my previous post ā the RE Janissary limits both build diversity and our ability to meaningfully balance the civilization. The question to me is: To what extent?
As is the case for many past changes, I have little to nothing to do with them, myself. Ideally, the individuals arguing for this change, in the past, would attempt to defend it, in the present.