gibson wrote:yea like for example right now hes trying to prove that china is good in age 2, so hes losing to people like sirmusket( non cheating sirmusket)
Ye he has peculiar ideas about whats viable in thisgame. Always has tbh
gibson wrote:yea like for example right now hes trying to prove that china is good in age 2, so hes losing to people like sirmusket( non cheating sirmusket)
momuuu wrote:Goodspeed wrote:To be fair Garja is, or at least was, a better player than his tournament results suggest. Why attach so much value to tournaments when we have all played against each other plenty of times to know how good everyone is/was?
Well tbh, to me his tournament results nicely reflect his game insight and how well he plays on his streams or if you face him. But thats hardly anything to base an argument on.
umeu wrote:Well, like gs says, i think youre being too harsh on him. Garjas problem is basically that hes too stubborn, he wont change his strats or adapt well in game. But his macro and micro are overall quite good and definitely better than most ppl who performed better than him in tournaments. If garja would stop doing his own builds and would start using good in meta builds, hes still a good player. Not as good as he was 5 years ago, but thats the same for everyone in that generation.
gibson wrote:yea like for example right now hes trying to prove that china is good in age 2, so hes losing to people like sirmusket( non cheating sirmusket)
Fact is Garja is top two.momuuu wrote:Garja wrote:Show hidden quotes
And if you play AOE for more than 5mins you should also know that those numbers mean nothing.
As for Diarouga skill level you guys are overstimating him by a lot. His mechanics are solid but not impressive and he hasn't achieved anything anyway. The moment he faced a tricky opponent (Aizmak) is the moment you can clearly see the limit of his playstyle.
Lets see: Diarouga reaches RO8 in spring 2015, ro16 in summer, semifinals in winter 2015, and he wins the ESOC invitational. Meanwhile, you have literally achieved nothing but claim as if Diarouga is bad. Garja, you literally live in a fantasy world where you have to twist reality and facts to protect your own very inflated ego. You're a medium quality player (honestly, I wasn't even surprised when a lt colonel like Kingofosmane literally bashed the fuck out of you) that thinks he's a top3 player and thus warps reality and comes up with ridiculous statements so that he can sleep at night thinking he's 'good' at aoe3. You seriously need a reality check.Garja wrote:I never said I did much better vs Aiz but in fact I did. At least I can understand the limit of my play and recognize how the opponent play. Diarouga is mostly a BO bot.
Also your superiorioty attitude in the forums when your biggest achievement was laming iro to a not even impressive elo score is very annoying.
A semi finalist of a big tournament and an invitational winner. If you look at the sheer tournament results, diarouga is one of the best players on this forum - and although he does come off as a bit arrogant from time to time, it's warrented. I know a player that has a superiority attitude without ever really having achieved much at all. Hint: look in the mirror.
EDIT: forgot to note Diarouga also got 2nd place in War chiefs invitational. If you would play diarouga there's about a 1% chance that you beat him in a serious series. You're 10 leagues lower. Those are simply the facts.
How about civ-reversal, then?momuuu wrote:yurashic wrote:Fucking drama bots, discussing who is "mid-tier" out of 20-25 pr30+ players left in aoe 3... Remember Eaglemut's post that only 1.7% games were played on EP in a certain month? We are all in a small sandbox, it's just laughable to argue so much, especially considering how random AOE can be sometimes...
It's not even something that should be argued about, obviously diarouga is better than garja and obviously a showmatch is useless. If Garja plays Brits and Diarouga plays China diarouga could even 'prove' that china beats british because he's just better.
gibson wrote:Garja you lost to tabben and sirmusket, 2 captains, playing age 2 China. Now reguardless of what jerom says, everyone here knows that you’re a decent player with solid mechanics. No offense to tabben but you’re a much better player then him. So why are you losing to captains if age 2 China is so good? The China banner army system just doesn’t cater to age 2. It’s almost impossible to get a correct army balance in a perlonged age 2 game. You can’t make an effective cav switch. You can’t effectively remiss anti cav or ranged infantry if you fall behind in either unit type. You don’t out eco anyone either. You have the element of surprise going for you and the fact that you can hit like 1 good timing with a unit shipment, banner army, and wonder army batch and that’s about it.
You don’t out eco anyone either.
gibson wrote:Now reguardless of what jerom says, everyone here knows that you’re a decent player with solid mechanics.
Garja wrote:gibson wrote:Garja you lost to tabben and sirmusket, 2 captains, playing age 2 China. Now reguardless of what jerom says, everyone here knows that you’re a decent player with solid mechanics. No offense to tabben but you’re a much better player then him. So why are you losing to captains if age 2 China is so good? The China banner army system just doesn’t cater to age 2. It’s almost impossible to get a correct army balance in a perlonged age 2 game. You can’t make an effective cav switch. You can’t effectively remiss anti cav or ranged infantry if you fall behind in either unit type. You don’t out eco anyone either. You have the element of surprise going for you and the fact that you can hit like 1 good timing with a unit shipment, banner army, and wonder army batch and that’s about it.
I literally lost 1 game vs each of them while winning like 5-6.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Garja wrote:noob logic
Kaiserklein wrote:@Garja how would china ever win vs fr or brit in late colonial lol? They can literally go pure double carded huss and just win...
Goodspeed wrote:China colonial is actually not even that bad. Could be viable in some MUs. I like that they have 3 unit shipments, makes them very flexible and means they have a nice spike in army pop that is hard to match.
The problem isn't that they can't beat other civs in late colonial, China is actually very comfortable there. The problem is it's very hard for China to prevent a (semi-)FF because they're slow.
tedere12 wrote:,300 export is sometimes very useful for a quick 8 cossacks switch in late colonial. I mostly use it for brit musks tho since china age2 is lacking anticav imo
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?