CaRp wrote:[spoiler=quote]Kaiserklein wrote:And anyway the real reason is that you guys decided that having a cheater list is bad because it brings negativity and witch hunts, not that you don't have people to care about the list (if you would ask for volunteers, I'm sure it would be easy to find. I volunteered myself already). Meanwhile, it just looks like you're protecting cheaters more than anything else.
The negativity and witch hunts thing is indeed a common argument and something that some (staff) members share. I personally think that won't be an issue as long as the accusations are properly dealt with (anonymous evidence, posted in a private board and judged by a team). I encourage you to create a thread to propose a team to the community and ask them if they trust this team with handling a ban list. Even if the staff/community decides they don't want a public ban list (which I think is unlikely, but I haven't polled it recently), you can always create a server with that team and post a ban list in an online Google Doc.
Saying we are protecting cheaters is telling half the truth. We are also protecting fair players from being falsely accused as well as protecting the positivity and environment in the community.
protecting fair players?
I was blocked by half the community. for a post of the lord hazza123.. in a game that did he not play.
https://eso-community.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14177&p=300080&hilit=carp#p300080
but that is not important for the "redact"
obvious that try to upload rec and ss but that was eliminated
[/spoiler]
so wait, what actually happaned in that case? how did you out gatter everyone with 30 vills?
--