Aizamk wrote:why are there four frenchmen in the top 10? are you sure it's working correctly?
The fact that Tit and Kynesie are nr1 and 2 at the moment, clearly shows that the current rating is not representative, galaxy's away from it in fact. Sure they are not bad, but far from top.
Here are some calculations, including the case about India (JP elo info used since Esoc info not showing these days, though it wouldnt make much of a difference):
- Tit total 1v1 games = 3446. Games played with India = 2618. So he plays 76% of his 1v1 games India (2618 / 3446)
- Total 1v1 games won = 2396 (70%). Total 1v1 games won with India = 1931
- Winrate with India = 1931 / 2618 = 74%
Games played without India = (3446 - 2618) = 828
Games won without India = (2396 - 1931) = 465
So, 1/1 winrate WITHOUT India is = 465 / 828 = 56% = X
X = what? Take into account some free Iro all-in rushes from some time ago, known lagg issues and you are left with what exactly?
Plus, which solid topplayer (to belong in the top rating) plays actually 76% one civ?
Sure some of the Indian winrate comes from cherry picking opponents, some of it from people not countering a sepoy rush properly, but even taking that into account, the above argument still stands.
As mentioned before in this topic, without QS you can play the same people over and over, or choose who you play (and who you dodge), making the current ELO far less acurate thani it otherwise would be.
Btw EP team, you could also make India houses free next time, similar to Sioux...