[Armag] diarouga wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:You think otto is overused? I don't see many people playing it
The reason why people don't spam it is because they play for fun.
Thatās why his name is bWINNER
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:You think otto is overused? I don't see many people playing it
The reason why people don't spam it is because they play for fun.
BrookG wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Honestly if we're gonna do an "underused civs" tournament we should ban more than 5. Russia IS overused, everyone plays it both in tourney and outside of it. But everyone also spams japan tbh, and dutch too I'd say.
For me underused civs are otto/ports/spain/aztecs/sioux/iro, and I guess china to some extent.
P.S: russia was also a top pick on baja guys...
*2nd after Otto
Most underused are Iroquois, Spanish, Portuguese, Aztecs, Chinese and Sioux. All much below average picks. Otto are close to Sioux, a bit above all previous
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Kaiserklein wrote:BrookG wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:Honestly if we're gonna do an "underused civs" tournament we should ban more than 5. Russia IS overused, everyone plays it both in tourney and outside of it. But everyone also spams japan tbh, and dutch too I'd say.
For me underused civs are otto/ports/spain/aztecs/sioux/iro, and I guess china to some extent.
P.S: russia was also a top pick on baja guys...
*2nd after Otto
Most underused are Iroquois, Spanish, Portuguese, Aztecs, Chinese and Sioux. All much below average picks. Otto are close to Sioux, a bit above all previous
You're only referring to tourney picks I guess. Keep in mind people watch lots of casual streams too.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Kaiserklein wrote:We don't really need data, it's obvious that dutch and japan are really not underused. If they're part of this tourney we're probably gonna see them every single series.
Aizamk wrote:the format should let you pick your opponents civ (they get to veto civs that cannot be picked for them). Mutual blind pick too
Warno wrote:Aizamk wrote:the format should let you pick your opponents civ (they get to veto civs that cannot be picked for them). Mutual blind pick too
I suggested this a while ago for a smackdown, I think it could be fun to watch. A fun weekend tournament would be perfect for this type of civ picking.
Lukas_L99 wrote:Warno wrote:Aizamk wrote:the format should let you pick your opponents civ (they get to veto civs that cannot be picked for them). Mutual blind pick too
I suggested this a while ago for a smackdown, I think it could be fun to watch. A fun weekend tournament would be perfect for this type of civ picking.
Then people would just pick their opponentās worst civ and weād have a drop in the overall quality of games.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Kaiserklein wrote:We don't really need data, it's obvious that dutch and japan are really not underused. If they're part of this tourney we're probably gonna see them every single series.
Japan is actually underused I would say.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
bwinner1 wrote:Will there be further civ restrictions or can I play otto every game and win the tourney ?
somppukunkku wrote:I actually wanna change my vote from yes to no.
If we do this tournament, why not go for actually rare civs. Ban rus+japs both imo.
BrookG wrote:somppukunkku wrote:I actually wanna change my vote from yes to no.
If we do this tournament, why not go for actually rare civs. Ban rus+japs both imo.
@Cometk what do you think about banning all civs scored above average?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?