Hey hazza unfortunately answer is NO, there is no way you can proof ports are better than what they were on RE, Garja says EP ports are better while he is shy to bring back RE ports which says enough I think.Hazza54321 wrote:breeze wrote:Hazza54321 wrote:RE ports had some proper broken shit (30rr goons, plus skirms on horse in age 4 and 5 mams) however it was getting to that point thats the problem, still dont get why people calculate the vill discount by sheer maths so one dimensional. Its so many little things that add up e.g. easier to get bigger batches of hu=0&map=&lenf=&lent=&ft=1
And where did i say they were good, i just think theyre bss early, queing vills faster to snowball res and depleting res slower which most of you dont seem to understand
You are thinking so one dimensional, just checked your and some other players's tournament history from NWC, ports are almost never picked on land maps it's a civ where people pick it on water maps or just for mirrors it explains fair enough I guess, Also you never played ports lol, if you really believe they are good, why you never picked them?
http://aoe3.jpcommunity.com/rating2/pla ... =6&ocetter on ep but still weak if you cared to read
About ports right now they are actually losing the Mu's where they should do ok, so they are defenitely not buffed lol
The elo link you posted is irrelevant btw, you post link of 10 games and generalize ports's situation that they are better right, For example I just checked my own elo page http://aoe3.jpcommunity.com/rating2/pla ... lent=&ft=1 and I have %67 win rate as russia, unlike you I really played the civ but still, I wouldn't talk that confident about russia balance lol. It's amazing that once you play the civ 10 times out 5k games. everyone is free to make a conclusion while Kynesie, Knusch Possibly Jerppa prefers RE ports over EP one.