Goodspeed wrote:ovi12 wrote:Just don't be too quick to consider a discussion "settled" after a couple of games.
Of course not. I'm just tired of "You're wrong." "No, you're wrong." Without any actualy games being played.
Goodspeed wrote:ovi12 wrote:Just don't be too quick to consider a discussion "settled" after a couple of games.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
princeofcarthage wrote:Ashvin wrote:princeofcarthage wrote:For the foreseeable future I am busy on saturday and sunday evenings, could do friday do, maybe a fantastic friday showdown?
Sioux mirror again?
BTW I wouldnt stoop so low as to give my account to someone to beat you. Also you playing me wasn't planned we just happened to be online at the same time.
When I said you gave I was kidding cuz I know you won't, but I know people make fake accounts all the time, so its possible that someone made one of your name as your primary is octanium, btw I am only saying its not you cuz the guy in game literally said, "how did you figure out(that I am jass)
Discussions like that are no fun, true. But usually there is more substance, right?ovi12 wrote:Goodspeed wrote:ovi12 wrote:Just don't be too quick to consider a discussion "settled" after a couple of games.
Of course not. I'm just tired of "You're wrong." "No, you're wrong." Without any actualy games being played.
Goodspeed wrote:Discussions like that are no fun, true. But usually there is more substance, right?ovi12 wrote:Show hidden quotes
Of course not. I'm just tired of "You're wrong." "No, you're wrong." Without any actualy games being played.
I guess this one wasn't particularly interesting.
last time i cryed was because i stood on Lego
Hazza54321 wrote:@deleted_user5 @Diarouga need a bo9 grudge rated match of sioux port
Hazza54321 wrote:It reminded me
krichk wrote:For some reason, you want the world to know that you're brave enough to challenge Challenger_Marco
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Breeze claimed that Sioux was bad civ
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Breeze claimed that Sioux was bad civ so I said he was wrong.
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Breeze claimed that Sioux was bad civ so I said he was wrong.
LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
Garja wrote:port - sioux is not very different from port - iro on land map so I dont get how you can think one is hopeless for port and the other one hopeless for sioux
Garja wrote:port - sioux is not very different from port - iro on land map so I dont get how you can think one is hopeless for port and the other one hopeless for sioux
IAmSoldieR wrote:Doesn't pure BR staying in age 2 for along time just beat port as they will be idled forever and cant get out units in batches greater than 5 units?
I think its an interesting MU, port can ATP on certain maps and water on others. Seems like if walls are safely up and game is not over by 15 min that sioux cant win.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests
Which top 10 players do you wish to see listed?
Which streams do you wish to see listed?