Should starting crates be fixed for all civilizations?

Yes
47
57%
No
36
43%
 
Total votes: 83

User avatar
New Zealand zoom
EP Project Lead
Posts: 9313
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

13 Aug 2019, 21:34

Although I am particularly interested in your opinion, I'm not particularly interested in arguing this topic, now. I will only say that it would definitively help balancing civilizations, significantly.


IIRC, last time we did this, it was split right down the middle. Thank you for your thoughts!
User avatar
France Kaiserklein
Pro Player
Posts: 8400
Location: Paris
GameRanger ID: 5529322

13 Aug 2019, 21:36

Lazy and bad solution
Can sirmusket calculate 5x - x??
[Armag] diarouga wrote:Playing Aztec is a 10% handicap

LoOk_tOm wrote:I have something in particular against Kaisar (GERMANY NOOB mercenary LAMME FOREVER) And the other people (noobs) like suck kaiser ... just this ..
China Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 6889
ESO: PrinceofBabu

13 Aug 2019, 21:37

its a boring change but it might have to be done. Civs with wood starts are kinda op and asian civs with gold start seem abit shit
User avatar
Great Britain Riotcoke
ESOC Media Team
Donator 01
Posts: 2646
ESO: Riotcoke
Location: Dorsetshire

13 Aug 2019, 21:38

Changes the meta too much and makes for dull gameplay.
Image
No Flag deleted_user0
Ninja
Posts: 13004

13 Aug 2019, 21:41

Kaiserklein wrote:Lazy and bad solution

Read: I play civs that get huge advantage having wood starts and I know the top civs won't have fixed wood starts. Therefore, I don't want the game to be more competitive as random crates give bring me advantage.
Sweden Hawk_Girl
Dragoon
Donator 01
Posts: 214

13 Aug 2019, 21:43

Doesn't exactly make china a boring civ having a fixed crate start..
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
EP Project Lead
Posts: 9313
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

13 Aug 2019, 21:44

somppukunkku wrote:
Kaiserklein wrote:Lazy and bad solution

Read: I play civs that get huge advantage having wood starts and I know the top civs won't have fixed wood starts. Therefore, I don't want the game to be more competitive as random crates give bring me advantage.
Maybe he likes the variety, even if it's mostly not meaningful (choice-driven).
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 21:44

I have to admit that Zoi is actually doing a very good job, by finally asking the right questions. :ohmy:

As most people know, I am totally for fixed crates, and I believe that it would drastically improve the balance. In fact, remove the 200w start for Germany would be the best way to balance the civ honestly.

Most people don't understand how big random crate is, I'll take some examples to try to prove that it is game changing.
1) Let's consider Dutch vs Japan.

A) On a wood start, Japan will get a consulate and a shrine for free, and will start aging at about 3min without treasures.
On a wood start, Dutch will start aging at 3min.

B) On a coin start, Japan will have to chop 105wood, and age at 3min20 because of that.
Dutch however, can age with 14 villagers, that is to say 2min40.

In the end, there's 40-50 second difference in relative age up time between both these scenarios. How is this acceptable? You're 40 seconds slower than your opponent just because you got an unlucky crate start, no wonder aoe2 players make fun of us xD.

2) China vs any civ

We all know China has fixed crates while your opponent doesn't. Thus, sometimes your opponent gets +100f, sometimes he gets +100f+100w and you get the same crates.
Again, how is it fair to start with +100w or -100w, just based on luck?

The biggest issue is still Germany and the TP start of course (yea, bigger than being +40sec faster or starting with -100w), but since experience isn't a normal resource, I can't really explain it, so you'll have to trust me on that.

Anyway, it doesn't really make the game "boring and dull", the only real difference is that you can't take TPs in age 1, which is exactly what fixed crates is meant to fix, as it is probably the biggest balance issue right now.

If people think it's too boring, removing wood start from Germany would be enough for me.
Image
China Hazza54321
Pro Player
Winter Champion 2020 x2Donator 01
Posts: 6889
ESO: PrinceofBabu

13 Aug 2019, 21:46

variety is good but maybe somehow make everytime dutch gets a coin start other dude gets wood start and vice versa rather than huge changes in both directions.
No Flag deleted_user0
Ninja
Posts: 13004

13 Aug 2019, 21:47

For variety, make some maps start with (known) extra crate and people can adjust their civs according to that in tournament. Variety. Win-Win.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 21:48

Hazza54321 wrote:variety is good but maybe somehow make everytime dutch gets a coin start other dude gets wood start and vice versa rather than huge changes in both directions.

It's still bad honestly. Coin start is the best for Dutch but playing against a wood start (ie free TP for nilla civs) and a coin start (market) is just not the same, and it would be unfair for Dutch.
Image
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 21:50

somppukunkku wrote:For variety, make some maps start with (known) extra crate and people can adjust their civs according to that in tournament. Variety. Win-Win.

Yea, Fixing the crates on each map seems better.
Seriously, I would just mirror Germany every time there's a 200w start instead of picking okish MUs on 100w start and praying not to get the 200w start lol.
Image
User avatar
France flontier
Dragoon
Intermediate Division Winner
Posts: 419
ESO: Flontier

13 Aug 2019, 21:52

Fre gonna be very sad, rip 8 huss opening :(
No Flag 5CH3U3R
Crossbow
Posts: 8

13 Aug 2019, 21:59

An alternative way would be to define that the random box could not be of the OP resource type for that civilization. For example:
German random box: food or gold;
Dutch random box: Wood or food;

Another option would be to set the random box as the second best option for that civilization. For example:
German Random Box: Gold
Dutch random box: wood

Still I think fixing all the boxes is a better option.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 22:01

5CH3U3R wrote:An alternative way would be to define that the random box could not be of the OP resource type for that civilization. For example:
German random box: food or gold;
Dutch random box: Wood or food;

Another option would be to set the random box as the second best option for that civilization. For example:
German Random Box: Gold
Dutch random box: wood

Still I think fixing all the boxes is a better option.

Yea, as I said, removing wood for Germany and coin for Japan is enough for me as it fixes the balance issues.
Image
Australia Peachrocks
Skirmisher
Posts: 160
ESO: Peachrocks

13 Aug 2019, 22:05

Ironically despite me seemingly being in favour of the random with natives I am pro fixed crates for one simple reason. Certain extra crates are near useless for some civs while others outright change their entire early game.

Randomly being able or not being able to do something in the first moments of the game is utter nonsense. In the big picture it doesn’t add diversity to strategy it conforms it.
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
EP Project Lead
Posts: 9313
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

13 Aug 2019, 22:09

Could still keep the random bonus food crate, as well, to change the pace of games, for variety.
User avatar
Malawi princeofcarthage
Retired Contributor
Posts: 3099
ESO: Princeofcarthage
Location: Milky Way!

13 Aug 2019, 22:10

If you achieve relative balance on a common ground in case say no tp maps or tp maps either way, random crates wouldn't be an issue rather open up multiple gameplay options
:bigs: :bigs: :bigs:
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
EP Project Lead
Posts: 9313
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

13 Aug 2019, 22:13

5CH3U3R wrote:An alternative way would be to define that the random box could not be of the OP resource type for that civilization. For example:
German random box: food or gold;
Dutch random box: Wood or food;

Another option would be to set the random box as the second best option for that civilization. For example:
German Random Box: Gold
Dutch random box: wood

Still I think fixing all the boxes is a better option.
This should solve most of the balance issues, but if anything, it just highlights the persistent problem: One spawn will simply be superior to the other, without offering any options in strategy.
User avatar
Brazil macacoalbino
Howdah
Posts: 1083
ESO: Chumbo_Grosso_

13 Aug 2019, 22:17

zoom wrote:This should solve most of the balance issues, but if anything, it just highlights the persistent problem: One spawn will simply be superior to the other, without offering any options in strategy.

Isn't it the case with any given crate spawn though?
Image
No hacks just (lack of) skillz

twitch.tv/chumbo_grosso_
User avatar
Italy gamevideo113
Howdah
Posts: 1743
ESO: gamevideo113

13 Aug 2019, 22:21

It's hard to say. On one hand it feels like fixing crates would take away from the game mechanics, on the other hand it is kinda necessary if we want to achieve the best balance possible.
I'm not against randomness in crate spawns but i think the randomness should be a bit standardized. Maybe give every civ a 50% chance of an extra food crate and a 50% (maybe 30?) chance of a second best crate (different for each civ) like 5CH3U3R was suggesting

So ger has fixed 100w 200f and on top of that 50% chance of food crate and 50%(/30%) chance of coin crate.
I think it would be sad to completely remove market starts or any kind of discovery age variety.
[Some people aspire to be pr30+, some people aspire to have fun, and some people aspire to play 3v3 Deccan.] - vividlyplain - 2019

Who (nationality) rape ?
stupid logic. noob players can say op?
toxic, Insult, Racism ?
User avatar
New Zealand zoom
EP Project Lead
Posts: 9313
ESO: Funnu
Location: New_Sweland

13 Aug 2019, 22:23

macacoalbino wrote:
zoom wrote:This should solve most of the balance issues, but if anything, it just highlights the persistent problem: One spawn will simply be superior to the other, without offering any options in strategy.

Isn't it the case with any given crate spawn though?
Absolutely—minus the balance issues.
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 22:24

princeofcarthage wrote:If you achieve relative balance on a common ground in case say no tp maps or tp maps either way, random crates wouldn't be an issue rather open up multiple gameplay options

We've discussed that a lot, but a lot of people (me included) believe that reaching a balance between TP and no TP is impossible.
Furthermore, coin start would still be an issue for Japan and India, and you'd still start with +100w against China sometimes.
Image
User avatar
France [Armag] diarouga
Ninja
NWC LAN Gold
Posts: 11131
ESO: diarouga
Location: France

13 Aug 2019, 22:25

macacoalbino wrote:
zoom wrote:This should solve most of the balance issues, but if anything, it just highlights the persistent problem: One spawn will simply be superior to the other, without offering any options in strategy.

Isn't it the case with any given crate spawn though?

Nope, read my first post.
Image
User avatar
Great Britain Riotcoke
ESOC Media Team
Donator 01
Posts: 2646
ESO: Riotcoke
Location: Dorsetshire

13 Aug 2019, 22:26

Would it be possible to make random crate spawns mu dependent? I.e have random crates on mus that are relatively unaffected by crate spawns but fixed crates otherwise?
Image

Forum Info

Return to “General”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests