Garja wrote:I am not even making it a big deal, you guys are with fixed crates and shit. It's pretty obvious that the only civ that actually deserves a crate change is China. As for 100g starts just play colonial I guess?
gl playing age2 with 1 village. couldn't even make a single unit cuz you're either popped, or you don't have a barracks lol.
this just shows how much bs you're talking. sure, you can make china's crates "fair". And then you have to change 10 other things just to buff them for that one "fair" change haha. OP idea. I'm 100% convinced you're full of shit. And I'm 100% right. byeee
As for having to probably change other stuff I agree. Not as many as you think tho. Anyway I'm ok with current China crates, but since we talk about fix crates and shit I just point out that China crates are the most nonsense one.
@Garja Tbh I couldn't imagine playing China without 300w, unless given some other major boon. Euro civs are able to get a house, a market, hunting dogs, a TP in transition; and can pull off a nice smooth semi-FF a lot of the time; while China needs to wait for 700w until they have decent infrastructure. Could you explain why you dislike China getting a village and a TP in age 1?
Garja wrote:It doesn't have to prove anything. It's just to show that it is something viable.
it's possible, that doesn't mean it's viable. You can also no tp 1 village FF as china shipping 300f instead of vills and beat a pr30 with it. that doesn't mean it's viable.
