China bad shipment low stats and low cost but same shipment low other civ
Cav and ranged cav useless
eco is bad
but in history have high eco lol
Play Civ5 and Domination. I hate not update but sell at steam. fk ms
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
-
- Skirmisher
- Posts: 102
- Joined: May 7, 2015
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
pecelot wrote:Your language skills are sick as well.marco1698 wrote:I love your English
you suck as well
- Nymphomaniac
- Dragoon
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Feb 17, 2015
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
China no bad shipments, mostly good shipmentschun wrote:China bad shipment low stats and low cost but same shipment low other civ
Cav and ranged cav useless
eco is bad
but in history have high eco lol
Play Civ5 and Domination. I hate not update but sell at steam. fk ms
Low stats with low costs is no bad thing
Cav not useless, ranged cav useless
Eco not that bad>'>'
China got that bastard OP explorer who not die in cover mode, China OP..
- britishmusketeer
- Howdah
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Feb 28, 2015
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
Chinas eco is not bad since they can make vills while aging and have a summer palace worth 4 vills and a porcelain tower worth 8 vills. They also get export which is like a 5%eco boost. History is not relevant because in history china never went to the new world.chun wrote:China bad shipment low stats and low cost but same shipment low other civ
Cav and ranged cav useless
eco is bad
but in history have high eco lol
Play Civ5 and Domination. I hate not update but sell at steam. fk ms
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
They still REKT 'dem Japs though' or vice versa...
Other players say cavalry china age3 good? badshipmentblance
As much as this post is an exaggeration in most general, I agree with the essence of it.jerom wrote:Meteor hammers are awesome though. Cav stats are fucking insane, but they have so much pathing issues that there attack is really half of what it would be if they were a ranged unit. Maybe more like 10%. Meteor hammers have almost no pathing issues, especially in conjunction with melee cav. I think when comparing meteor hammers to hussars, you should just double their attack to actually match reality. And iron flails effectively have less pathing issues than huss too, due to the presence of meteor hammers, so in practice they probably suffer much less from pathing issues than hussars do.
Thats probably the biggest thing about chinese cav. Thats why they always seem to perform much better than they should according to their stats.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests