Its true thoJotunir wrote:Sorry but I can't take that opinion seriouslyRiotcoke wrote:Because legacy is way worse than DE. Anyone who says otherwise is either salty they can't run DE or an Idiot.tim_retek wrote:Legacy has been dead ever since DE came out. It's next to impossible to get a lobby if you're around or above captain level. I'm not sure why to be honest, from what i've seen and heard DE sucks.
Look how legacy die since april
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Re: Look how legacy die since april
It's not, AOE3 legacy with EP is still much better than that "Definitive" edition.blackout wrote:Its true thoJotunir wrote:Sorry but I can't take that opinion seriouslyShow hidden quotes
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Ngl, from what I've read about DE balance and the new civs combined with QS-only matchmaking I'd probably agree
Re: Look how legacy die since april
If my computer wouldn't be 20 years old id say the game is just how its supposed to be for my 1400 elo
Re: Look how legacy die since april
balance in matchmaking isn't that bad, and considering that there is matchmaking even if the balance was worse it would still be betterGoodspeed wrote:Ngl, from what I've read about DE balance and the new civs combined with QS-only matchmaking I'd probably agree
mad cuz bad
Re: Look how legacy die since april
The AOE3 engine is not even able to use all the computer resources optimally.blackout wrote:If my computer wouldn't be 20 years old id say the game is just how its supposed to be for my 1400 elo
I've just built a new PC with latest generation specs and AOE3 still crashes after some time if I try to play an 1v7 comp stomp on expert. It says not enough memory allocation. And I have top 32GB RAM from GSkill. The game was just written to work on old comps, so you don't need to have the latest hardware to play it.
Re: Look how legacy die since april
It's not about matchmaking balance. Automatic matchmaking is itself not preferable in a game as unbalanced as this. I would want to be able to opt out of playing against certain civs on certain maps.n0el wrote:balance in matchmaking isn't that bad, and considering that there is matchmaking even if the balance was worse it would still be betterGoodspeed wrote:Ngl, from what I've read about DE balance and the new civs combined with QS-only matchmaking I'd probably agree
Re: Look how legacy die since april
matchmaking is great, i just want to be able to block swedes from showing up
Re: Look how legacy die since april
its not as unbalanced as the tournament suggests, and even if it were I would still rather play that than EP where there is no matchmaking at all, no player base at the times i play and being forced to play fixed matchups from a lobby.Goodspeed wrote:It's not about matchmaking balance. Automatic matchmaking is itself not preferable in a game as unbalanced as this. I would want to be able to opt out of playing against certain civs on certain maps.n0el wrote:balance in matchmaking isn't that bad, and considering that there is matchmaking even if the balance was worse it would still be betterGoodspeed wrote:Ngl, from what I've read about DE balance and the new civs combined with QS-only matchmaking I'd probably agree
mad cuz bad
Re: Look how legacy die since april
I get that you would, but not every player is the same
Re: Look how legacy die since april
yeah it sucks to get a sweden match up or a bad map (tired of new england). that said lobby match making wasn't fun when you would get kicked for being low or couldn't agree to a match up. like, join a lobby and you have to play otto, ugh. but with matchmaking you just don't think about it, get your map and do your best.
it's a balance. not sure what is best
it's a balance. not sure what is best
- sebnan12
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Nov 15, 2015
- ESO: Mongobillione
- Location: Switzerland
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Yea same civ balance on de is way worse than ep. Obviously the graphics and the gameplay are another story thoughGoodspeed wrote:Ngl, from what I've read about DE balance and the new civs combined with QS-only matchmaking I'd probably agree
"Why are you trying to lecture me on my own language, no wonder you people shit in the open street."- Riotcoke
''man he's slow rolling him more than a fish on a royal flush'' - Garja
NEED MORE XP
''man he's slow rolling him more than a fish on a royal flush'' - Garja
NEED MORE XP
- sebnan12
- Jaeger
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Nov 15, 2015
- ESO: Mongobillione
- Location: Switzerland
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Its horrible tbhn0el wrote:its not as unbalanced as the tournament suggests, and even if it were I would still rather play that than EP where there is no matchmaking at all, no player base at the times i play and being forced to play fixed matchups from a lobby.Goodspeed wrote:It's not about matchmaking balance. Automatic matchmaking is itself not preferable in a game as unbalanced as this. I would want to be able to opt out of playing against certain civs on certain maps.Show hidden quotes
"Why are you trying to lecture me on my own language, no wonder you people shit in the open street."- Riotcoke
''man he's slow rolling him more than a fish on a royal flush'' - Garja
NEED MORE XP
''man he's slow rolling him more than a fish on a royal flush'' - Garja
NEED MORE XP
- I_HaRRiiSoN_I
- Retired Contributor
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Jan 15, 2016
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Look how legacy die since april
I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
Re: Look how legacy die since april
yeah idk if the guys was talking about the peak of the big lockdown of april 2020, but personnally for my post i was talking about april 2021, before april eso was still at 1000+ pop the week end, now we not even reach 500Kaiserklein wrote:That peak was before DE, it was in April 2020. I think that was just when a big part of the world was under lockdowngibson wrote:Well it boosted in April when the US came out, than dropped back to its normal numbers, not rly surprising. The same thing will happen when Africa shit is released.
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Well, there's like the same game with more content and better graphics calling itself the definitiv edition, so of course the original game loose its players. ^^
Lobbies is like the only real thing being better in legacy.
I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
Lobbies is like the only real thing being better in legacy.
Re: Look how legacy die since april
sure, if you have a lot of people that play at the same time as you.I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
mad cuz bad
-
- Gendarme
- Posts: 5996
- Joined: Jun 4, 2019
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Might be a difference between EU/NA. I believe ESO was quite desolate at prima NA time. Most of the community seemed to center on prime EU time. I know I never tried to play in the EU morning either, servers have been dead at those times for maybe a decade.n0el wrote:sure, if you have a lot of people that play at the same time as you.I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
So maybe you perceive the forced ladder more positively than EU players because of differences in what ESO is like depending on your preferred time to play.
Re: Look how legacy die since april
The main issue with de are endless bugs...Cleters wrote:Well, there's like the same game with more content and better graphics calling itself the definitiv edition, so of course the original game loose its players. ^^
I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
Lobbies is like the only real thing being better in legacy.
Re: Look how legacy die since april
n0el wrote:sure, if you have a lot of people that play at the same time as you.I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
What's the difference ? Currently you can't know if people are online, in game or not...
If there's few players online, aren't lobbies way better ?
How do you find a game today, if there's 6 players at all at your rank, but 1 is searching 1v1, 2 are searching 2v2 and 3 are searching 3v3 ? With lobbies people of the same lvl just regrup....
Re: Look how legacy die since april
I can know if my friends are online. There's not few players online, there were much fewer players online in RE/EP and RE was objectively better for me. DE is significantly better because the balance is better and the maps don't spawn without resources.Cleters wrote:n0el wrote:sure, if you have a lot of people that play at the same time as you.I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
What's the difference ? Currently you can't know if people are online, in game or not...
If there's few players online, aren't lobbies way better ?
How do you find a game today, if there's 6 players at all at your rank, but 1 is searching 1v1, 2 are searching 2v2 and 3 are searching 3v3 ? With lobbies people of the same lvl just regrup....
mad cuz bad
Re: Look how legacy die since april
There are like no bugs anymore. I swear people still think this is the same game as the launch version and they just repeat the same endless bullshit over and over...yurashic wrote:The main issue with de are endless bugs...Cleters wrote:Well, there's like the same game with more content and better graphics calling itself the definitiv edition, so of course the original game loose its players. ^^
I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
Lobbies is like the only real thing being better in legacy.
mad cuz bad
Re: Look how legacy die since april
Forced ladder is significantly better for lots of reason, but that is one of them.RefluxSemantic wrote:Might be a difference between EU/NA. I believe ESO was quite desolate at prima NA time. Most of the community seemed to center on prime EU time. I know I never tried to play in the EU morning either, servers have been dead at those times for maybe a decade.n0el wrote:sure, if you have a lot of people that play at the same time as you.I_HaRRiiSoN_I wrote:I'd just rathe replay lobby games with mates instead of getting tilted on the ladder
So maybe you perceive the forced ladder more positively than EU players because of differences in what ESO is like depending on your preferred time to play.
mad cuz bad
Re: Look how legacy die since april
n0el wrote: I can know if my friends are online. There's not few players online, there were much fewer players online in RE/EP and RE was objectively better for me. DE is significantly better because the balance is better and the maps don't spawn without resources.
Yup, I agree DE is a better game than legacy, but I really hope for lobbies someday. Like man, IDK, It just seem I queue forever, I swear I had game faster on nilla when we were like 20 pr30+ at the end.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests